RLLD

So you read it.....the proof...and on queue.....you pretend it away, as you do over and over......quick question can you reference a time where someone provided you proof and you changed your mind? Ever? Honest question....

Answer my question. Would it move from "theatre" to "legitimate" if we could accuse Ron Desantis of this same stuff? Or Trump? Would that make you suddenly care?

I think it very well could be an issue, but so too are many other things. I do not think it is an issue worth discussing unless somehow the legal system which has worked so well to prosecute it seems to be failing. The real problem is that expectation that we can force women to make choices we insist for them is farcical and wrong. If people do not make choices we believe are statistically justified....too bad....

You stupid fock..... his focking attorneys admitted he was and was under threat from the other gang......c'mon man, you need to read.... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1k4072e3nno

So they are true.....but you consider them "theatre"....interesting, is there anything about his criminal activity that you do not consider <ahem>...."theatre"? Would it help if say,,,,oh I dont know....these accusations were made against....uhmmmm.....Ron Desantis? Would THAT may these activities suddenly......worthy of scorn?

Its not, which is why I say both do it.....it is more often true that liberals pretend they do not....they are better....hold a more moral position, when in reality they dont. This idea that supporting illegal immigration makes you somehow more moral ignores the moral consequences of that positions. You feel that those consequences are suitable so you stand up for these people.... conversely I see the consequences and stand up for those who endure them, prioritizing our own citizens over immigrants. We are both wrong, and we are both "right" in a sense.

Its not, which is why I say both do it.....it is more often true that liberals pretend they do not....they are better....hold a more moral position, when in reality they dont. This idea that supporting illegal immigration makes you somehow more moral ignores the moral consequences of that positions. You feel that those consequences are suitable so you stand up for these people.... conversely I see the consequences and stand up for those who endure them, prioritizing our own citizens over immigrants. We are both wrong, and we are both "right" in a sense.

Its all I need to support his deportation, that he later admitted to being in a criminal gang....or that he was a wife beater....or a human trafficker is just sprinkles on top.

I think I want to go back and find all those posts back in the day, but man....I know you will just deflect some other way....like Tapper pretending he never knew or saw....liberals lie so easily and deflect rather than accept....so now I face a dilemma....are you a Tim Hauk who asks for things and then pretends the proof is not proof....deflect and deflect? On the one hand your hypocrisy would be on display for all to see and maybe they the understand your statements are of no credibility....but then again I think most people already know this....so what is the value to me? Le me think about it... I infer you are asking for only those posting here, and not the liberal leaders who did it? Right?

Isn't it cure that some still think sexism and racism dominate issues, despite the profound deference provided to these groups.....and want to think its still 1950.....and then wonder why change is not happening....when in reality they are looking for something of no value to promote change.....like worrying about a rash when you have cancer....and at least some european researchers have figured it out....even if morons here still want to pretend

His prior court designation for deportation due to him being seen as a criminal on October 10, 2019 is all we need to know..... anything past that is pure political theatre, conducted by the corrupt to manipulate the weak minded.

That is just the facade put on it, a regurgitation of the political scheming from his ideological masters. Its not a real concerrn.

Oh yes, you all did, but only later when it suits your momentary needs will you pretend it now exists.

I am honestly asserting my observation of liberal behavior. You care or not care purely based on the political value at that time.

Politicians will announce their "moral" position based on the situations context; more pointedly based on the political benefit.....

Of course I did. Liberals continue to pretend fraud never happens....when their preferred candidate wins....which is farcical.

Simply that election fraud always happens, when questioning the 2020 election with regard to voter fraud the response is over the top. The protestation response is so strong that it sorta makes you all look guilty. Instead of accepting there likely was some, you pretend it never happened at all....which is wierd....its too strong a response....does that make sense?

Uh, no...clearly that is not what my point was....but sure, throw a strawman in and see where it goes.....by all means....

Of course it happens. And its not limited to one side. Pretending it never happens is just how Democrats protect the outcome of the 2020 election.

Killer who fatally stabbed 4 University of Idaho students still at large OK, so a knife was used. No MSM/Democrat leverage to attack gun rights then. Prediction: 1) Perp is a white male. We get a heavy dose of "right wing nut" or misogynist Trumper or evil right wing conservative narrative from MSM at the very least. 2) Per is a black male. Limited coverage other than the victims and the notion that "we need to wait and learn more" and this violence was caused by right wing extermism....etc.

Yeah, your villain is my hero, and my villain is your hero Put simply. You think supporting that POS feeds some moral stance, when in reality you are just setting up people to be criminalized. Not yourself necessarily....oh no...but fock the rest of the people right? Lets get some foreign criminals in here, let them loose on the good people so morons like yourself can hold some faux sense of moral superiority. You are filth

This inclination to pretend we still live in the 1950's baffles me. I think your lack of appreciation for the incredible progress made is sad. Rather than choose the lazy route of ?its just because men are mean", I suggest you delve into it more. Could there be some mean men out there? Sure.... Is that why women are not in the field....absofuckinglutely not....the real influence is far more interesting, and wasting time on 1950's era thinking is less useful

So you.....accuse...then when asked to produce some evidence, you point at me? You DO see how that looks, right?

Well, yeah, evidence was provided, in enough content that we will have a trial...thats how the system works...not sure what you are thinking happens.