RLLD

Given the allowance for violence, I think the inference of support is valid.

Not vague, just inconvenient for your beliefs.

Agree. Gratefully Trump moved decisively to prevent what Democrats have allowed in the past. The good people in LA deserved protection from the bad. So we are all good..... the OUTCOME was positive.

I consider the allowance for Hamas supporters at Columbia and other campuses to be enough. That is all I need. I see those on the right assailing it, and those on the left allowing it. I need nothing more than that to hold my view. But there is so much more.... your better bet here is to establish that support for Palestine is not support for Hamas, which is the deflection I think most politicians use to hide their intentions, but again, actions matter. If people can correlate support for Israel to support for oppression, well, we can do that back.... Rashida Tlaib has participated in pro-Palestinian rallies and speeches, using the zero-tolerance stances of modern liberalism, we can establish that any support for Hamas-related elements is therefore unacceptable....again, not my rule, its your side that allows absolutism to rule... Ilhan Omar Accused Israel of committing “war crimes” during its military operations, so then by extension the October 7th work was war crimes? And then by extension when you support Palestine you support Hamas and war criminals? Even some in her own party have been forced to call out her antisemitism Omar reportedly arrived on Campus and embraced the banned Kymani James, who was banned for stating ‘Zionists don’t deserve to live’ and people should be grateful James wasn’t killing them.”(“ADL Accuses Rep. Omar Of ‘Blood Libel’ For Saying Some Jewish Students Pro-Genocide,” The Times Of Israel, 4/28/2024) Oh and lets not forget that the little coward (james) posted pictures of himself with Rep. Ayanna Pressley describing her as ‘my mentor and friend.’”(“ADL Accuses Rep. Omar Of ‘Blood Libel’ For Saying Some Jewish Students Pro-Genocide,” The Times Of Israel, 4/28/2024) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has supported Palestinian protesters and called for a ceasefire when it was time for Israel to respond to criminal actions by Hamas, In 2021, submitted a resolution to block a U.S. arms sale to Israel. visited the Columbia University encampment in support of the Hamas supporters. When police finally stepped in to quell the antisemitic filth, her little buddy Jamaal Bowman criticized the police for doing it....because....you see....we ALLOW Hamas terrorist a voice....but JEWS need to be suppressed....if you are a liberal at least....(“‘Squad’ Members Descend On Columbia Encampment, Offer 'Support' For Anti-Israel Agitators,” Fox News, 4/26/2024) nti-Israel protesters, meanwhile, have been heard chanting ‘Al-Qassam, you make us proud, kill another soldier now!’ ‘We say justice, you say how. Burn Tel Aviv to the ground!’ and ‘Hamas, we love you. We support your rockets, too!(“‘Squad’ Members Descend On Columbia Encampment, Offer 'Support' For Anti-Israel Agitators,” Fox News, 4/26/2024) Jamaal Bowman, when asked if he’s OK with the protestors occupying Columbia building. ‘The protestors are gonna do what they got to do. For me, it needs to just remain nonviolent, make sure no person is harmed in the process.(CNN’s Manu Raju, @mkraju, Twitter, 4/30/2024) When they bother to speak out, its not about anything other than worry about their power.... Democrats split over campus protest crackdown SOOOOO....yeah, your people have allowed this to transpire.....because they hate Jews....if this were some white supremacists doing this to black people they would send in the Marines....but since they hate Jews....well...fock them....right?

I might suggest she has every reason to believe she will be protected and perhaps celebrated. The left has no constraints over who and what they support. There is no reason for her to fear being vile. Now, with adults in the DOJ maybe we see some level of accountability, who knows.

I mean, you can do your own research.... but....for discussion sake. Mayor Wheeler allowed antifa to run wild while Republicans criticized him strenuously for doing so, and eventually enough harm was done that he simply had to deal with it and allowed the police to protect citizens...but only after people were really harmed..... Mayor Durkan referred to the antifa takeover as the summer of love, which was another instance of renaming something really vile to pretend it was nice. It was not until the harm really escalated that she too finally caved and allowed the police to protect citizens...but only after people were really harmed..... I think your argument might be better suited to conform to the liberal talking point of antifa not being an "organization", but you would need to wait for the harm to reach that level where it no longer serves your power interest to use that tactic of reframing them

No, I am not. And when it has arisen that political pressure arises to fend off these terrorist groups, it typically comes from the right and the left defends the terrorists. Such as with the Hamas support found in some college campuses..... I mean, I get the desire to be "inclusive" and such, but there should be a little more discern applied to not allow for the really bad ones.

It adds up. If you consider that in Democrat-dominated localities AA's suffer the most, but then Democrats pretend is because of others....not them...yet Democrats have held power in these locations for decades. So they sell their harm as being caused by others, and voters eat it up.

"Good to say" is your criteria? I mean, its not mine...but if that is what you think matters. For me, it is the allowance provided to them to act. Again, words are meaningless, its the actions.

Some likely were, I mean.... those who were impacted by the violence. But Democrat leadership less so. As demonstrated by their words. It might seem crazy, but this is what transpired.

I hesitate to suggest they "backed" them, though there likely is some support for the assertion. I prefer to see it as "allowance" for them, they gave them room to be viciously brutal to localities as it served their pursuit for power. The Democrats likely saw them as useful idiots, without enough regard for the fact that Democrats are also on the menu for these groups.

Antifa is the standard "name it something good" tactic of leftists when implementing something harmful. Regardless of the moniker they choose their actions are absolute fascistic. They are anarchists who only want the destruction of our nation, which makes them ready partners for Democrats.

Its fine for you to believe that of course, but based on recent history I think his action averted a repeat of liberals burning, looting and killing. And clearly their inability to achieve those outcomes this time really bothered them

Of course it is, as it was in every other instance. No rioting will occur because the victim here is white, plain and simple....and white people have not been indoctrinated to pretend that the system is unfair, we accept it for its faults and do not use stupid one-off situations as a reason to burn our locality....like morons do....

I doubt he is elected. But if he IS elected....they get what they deserve. Let the people who vote for him suffer. Sometimes people only learn from suffering.

In this instance it is gang bangers.....in other instances it might be anarchists bent on the destruction of our society(antifa), and in other instances radical racist marxists (BLM). If you are a terrorist and can create some mayhem, Democrats see you as useful

It has become rather evident that fomenting social unrest to harm cities and citizens is now part and parcel of Democrat strategy. Which is why they were so angry when Trump stopped it with military intervention.

I disagree. I think Democrats derive social currency from the premise of "being accepting". Which is fine. However, their refusal to discriminate means they allow Antifa, Hamas, criminal aliens and on and on.....and in this instance no one in the party is standing up to this clown in NYC. And as a party they should.

At some point I have to believe that they harm to such an extent that they see their congressional power start to wane. I anticipate it will take that threat for them to stop harming people......nothing else matters to Democrats, power above anything else. Its going to be the only pain point to which they will respond.

I mean, yeah, in this regard he would be your average politician. Not that it matters. We should expect this from any and all of them. Outcomes are what matter.

I dont think anyone is at all surprised that a Democrat rep would say this, at this stage they are far more aligned with criminals than with most Americans.

To be fair, I do not think it actually is. I think radicals who are intent on the destruction of our nation are able to find a home in the Democrat party and then effectively leverage the "D" as their useful idiots to further their desire to destroy this culture and nation. These people are not actually "Democrats" at all. They are Marxist/Socialist terrorists that the Democrats simply accept.

I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter. Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money.

I accept that he paid a pro star to hide his infidelity, and I could not care less. It is that you pretend this is important that your party has useless leadership

Pretty happy across the board. Still a little peeved that there was not more cost cutting in that budget, but I also understand there is not a silver bullet for our problems.