RLLD

Your link was to Wikipedia.....also an opinion piece, but if you disagree with the opinion I can get behind that, I disagree with the opinion that the prosecutor was fired for anything other than being a threat to Hunter. Regardless of what Grassley has put forth, we have the comments from the individual noted from the time period. Now back to your usage of the Grassley link.....the entire purpose of the investigation is to find that mistake they made as part of their criminal enterprise. The entire reason for the setup with the fake LLC's is to hide the crime.....these people are not just going to admit it.....hand over the fact of what they did..... Grassley is only alluding to what I have already said.....we do not yet have proof of what Biden did for the money.... That is why another important part of the Grassley details is the acknowledgement Zlochevsky claimed to have many text messages and recordings that show that he was coerced into paying the Bidens to ensure Shokin was fired. Specifically, he claimed to have two recordings with Joe Biden and 15 recordings with Hunter Biden. Zlochevsky also retained two documents, presumably financial records, as evidence of the arrangement, but said he didn’t send any funds directly to the “Big Guy,” a term understood to be a reference to Joe Biden. References to the “Big Guy” surfaced in communications involving other Biden family business arrangements independent of the Burisma arrangement. Zlochevsky claimed it would take investigators 10 years to uncover the illicit payments to the Bidens, according to the document. I would like to see the present investigation continue, and if they can prove what is evident from numerous whistle blowers and bank records.....then I would like them to correlate Biden actions to payments. But I am also a realist. Both the media and the DOJ have demonstrated allegiance to Biden and protect him well. We have to accept that no matter how well they investigate, we may never know to what extent Biden sold us out....

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C2PmnVbs1mg/?igsh=eWZhdDc0eXNoaXQ1

Team Obama loved Victor Shokin, so why did Joe Biden get him fired? In fact the Ukrainians did not really want Biden interfering... they did not want to pay him a cent....but gave in to the Biden demands.... Burisma Owner Thought Hunter Biden Was Dumber Than His Dog: FBI Document

‘A sense of betrayal’: liberal dismay as Muslim-led US city bans Pride flags They were so proud of their virtuosity and moral game play......and never stopped for a moment to think about what they had done, and the implications of it.....until it came back to bite them.

If we look at how Democrats think about minority groups it adds up. Remember, if you dont vote for Biden "you aint black". And if there was a hint that these folks emigrating here were likely conservative voters then you would see Democrats lock that border down in hours, while Republicans demanded it stay wide open. I have submitted, and again to the notable consternation of a set of conservatives here, that the folks emigrating here want nothing to do with much of what Democrats represent today; aside from open borders. So later, things like supporting the mentally ill transgenders and indoctrinating kids with nearly pornographic elements will compel these people to turn away. And this has already been demonstrated by the way, we have examples.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1054902902428232?fs=e&mibextid=UalRPS

As stated.....I base my concern from past behaviors where they project on others....that which they are inclined to do themselves..... When these accusations arise, I am compelled to first consider this inclination......and extend from it that they are the ones with the thought, and the tilt toward actually doing the thing they accuse others.

Politicians have historically only been too happy to serve their back room money changers, of course. But this instance is clearly one where Democrats feel they can pull in enough future voters to suppress the voting voice of their opponents. This they do behind their standard faux veil of moral superiority. People here in this nation are getting wise to it, and understand that this little move would not only suppress alternative ideas, but also result in lower compensation across the board; notably for historically disenfranchised people, and their voices are growing..... People come here for many reasons, free stuff is integral to it, but also due to the promise of a meritocracy...... and it is at this point where those on the right and I start to get abrasive.... My point being that the more Democrats try to enact policies that lead us to look like the places these people have escaped, notably embracing marxist dogma, the more these folks will vote for simple and sane policies arising from the right. There is nothing wrong with controlling, or limiting, immigration.

You will note I did not make the assertion your strawman is suggesting, but instead am pointing to the tendency of Democrats to decry and project on to others that which they themselves will do....and this one is a little more sinister than usual.

The act of using the military.....as a political tool.....is in the heads of Democrats, we have already seen it in the past....and here they are....making it clear once more.....that THEY are the ones with this mentality and idea.....and projecting it on others....which is part and parcel of liberalism. All I am saying is that we should absolutely interpret this as an indication that this is where liberals are willing to go, given their propensity to make this baseless assertions....and then be discovered doing the things themselves.

We can agree to disagree on the why. I surmise you see people from a utopian perspective, but I have been to the places these people are coming from....I assure you, they know they can come here and secure access to free services and the like. That is the initial motivation. But when I note the additional items, they also know that the narratives here which lie about racism and the like are completely false, and the socialist hell holes they see to escape are far less equitable than things are here....and that is always going to have an allure.... none of this justifies illegal immigration. They can be convinced not to come, just as they were convinced to come initially....both are possible. It is not a final solution....just a move in the right direction. A more long term solution must come from Democrats relenting on open borders and acquiescing to the simple ask from their counterparts to just enforce the laws we already have. Past that, both sides finding a reasonable compromise, the absolutism needs to end....and it starts with the cessation of labelling people who object as "racist" or some other phobic excrement....

Trump is not elected yet. When Democrats do this little game, invariably we learn they are the ones we should have been worried about. This is little more than them telling us what is in their head, what they are designing.... We should pay attention when they do this.

First and foremost, the implication of not being able to access stems the tide....does not erase it, but diminishes the scale. People are keenly aware that they can leave their locality and come here to secure free food and services, the enticement is just too much. This nation is the most free, least racist, more ordered and fair place ever to exist....and people around the world know it.... Stop them at the border and we stem the tide, this must happen immediately.

Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House Fear mongering aside, for the moment.....Democrats have well-trodden history now of projecting what they are already doing....or will do.... I am decidedly concerned about this maneuver on their part, as it would convey exactly what THEY are thinking.....and this is nasty stuff....

It is now both a crisis AND a catastrophe. And it could have been avoided. And to hear some of the explanations, like we need people to pick berries......I mean, what the hell is wrong with these people? Are they really so desperate for power, that they are willing to secure it from the misery of these people?

I understand. I really do. But I submit that we still try it, regardless of the thoughts of those presently allowing it to be a catastrophe. JMHO In parallel, I would like to see some action to secure the border on the part of the WH and Congress FIRST. Deal with the immediate damage, handle it....stop pretending we need to look at root causes.... Lets just be able to admit here that Democrats want open borders and Republicans want strong borders. That are at opposite ends of this one.

Correct. Statistically its irrelevant. But if you reverse the ethnicity of the participants (and there are examples) no one makes a sound.....because that is what racism looks like....

The Martin and Brown instances were low handing fruit to the race hucksters, but those instances really lacked the needed elements to be some "proof" that AA's were somehow mistreated. One would think there must be better instances to exploit out there......not sure why these were chosen. And you take these instances, and reverse the pigment of the participants and no one cares......because racial exploiters cannot benefit from those.

I have heard that refrain over and over, until they produce them I am not really interested. I think we have enough whistleblower stuff, bank records and content from the laptop to at least support the investigation.....to an extent.... If it arises.....that they determine a whistleblower was unreliable.....or someone paid some company to setup Biden with false records or ANY other political chicanery, or anything exculpatory is found....and they keep investigating.....I WILL have a problem with that.

When caught on her lie, she deftly skirts it

Mistakes were made. In his zeal to appease his more militant elements within the party, he swung too hard. His actions to upheave the policies that were effective only hurt him, well, it emboldened the more militant elements as well....and their radical marxist antics then went into play. If you are going to follow good policies with anarchist marxism....its not really going to go well.

To be clear. There is enough evidence on hand to investigate. No criminality has yet been proven. That being said, given that what we see with regard to the Biden's has been observed elsewhere, notably with organized crime.....there is likely some level of malfeasance present. NOW....to repeat myself, and be perfectly clear (well, to make some effort to stave off the strawman and misuse of my words)..... there is not yet any proof that Biden implemented policy-related actions for the money he was provided.

Of course. There are plenty of people I feel are likely guilty before the outcome of a trial. But what "I" think matters little. What matters is what those pursuing the illegality think. For example. I might think you have committed a crime. Well, if there is no evidence to suggest then no one should investigate you.....no investigation should transpire without some evidence. But if in the course of that investigation there is exculpatory evidence, or perhaps it becomes apparent that someone lied about you, they should then stop, correct? It would be against our values to investigate people unless we think they are guilty, and it is clear based on what has been presented, which is not all of it as well, that these people are likely criminals..... so yeah, I will feel that way until either proven otherwise, or they are found to not be criminal. This is how our system works