RLLD

So you have a language based on skin color.......wow....

There are some simple axioms. 1) When a liberal accuses you of something rest assured they are doing that very thing.....and if you look into them you will discover that they essentially tell you their criminal activity. 2) Liberals are the boss-level of character assassination. If you highlight their flaws and errors and negative outcomes, rest assured they will seek to cancel your voice by giving it some label 3) Liberals are in hot pursuit of totalitarian power. When you have a group, such as we do with modern liberals, that asserts you are either with them or the enemy who must be destroyed.....you are dealing with totalitarianism and the wielding of awful power if they get it.....as demonstrated by the lawfare they use against their proclaimed enemies. And when you think this way, you allow yourself to be as evil and vile as it takes to defeat that which you have declared evil....

This is not a real question. They happily murder children in the womb to avoid inconvenience; and full disclosure I support their stance on this...... They are only too happy to separate children from parents, think the government should hold sway over the rearing of children, and are only too willing to chemically castrate etc..... The sinister evolution of liberalism by external elements into this Nazi-esque sort of movement is chilling to be sure.

Fine by me, but if he is also inappropriate with children, as was Sandusky and apparently Biden as well as the Epstein list, then let him and they all be accountable. Thats all.....

Of course, and recent history has shown us that there is really no law or element of decency that they will not violate in their pursuit of power. But that is what we know will happen, this move by courts and others to threaten Democracy is something more new. But it adds up. They have convinced themselves that others are evil, and they are good.....and when you do this then nothing is off the table in terms of your behavior.

Abusing children of course....

Of course I do, and have maintained this position all along... I leave it to you and your ilk to decide to protect those in power......

I did, you can try to gaslight me about it, but I did that on purpose. It was less about being clever so much as trying it a different way. I surmise you dont appreciate it being done to you, and that is entirely fair.

So far your responses fall short of anything approaching a discussion. That is unfortunate as your history on this forum is one of a thinker and someone who does often try to have a dialogue. Now, to be fair, I apologize for setting and springing that trap, I had no way of knowing it would be YOU that strayed into it.....and was mostly hoping for a few others to do it.

I led with an argument that was essentially a strawman, and did so on purpose. I purposely employed the exact method I knew someone else would eventually employ toward me, and in this case you did it. The reason I did this was to get ahead of the flawed logic, to essentially put it down in front of folks such as yourself to see if you would even pause before using it......because you would first have to refute my own logic before you then used it for yourself......you can see how that can be entertaining.... Of course my second point is spot on, and its a real problem for those who seek to lie about voter identification. I need not prove a problem at all, that is not a requirement.

Israeli strikes across Gaza kill dozens of Palestinians, even in largely emptied north Oh well..... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I have no empathy for these people, this is exactly what they wanted. I actually hope Israel is able to kill as many as possible.

I am not sure just how......yet....but it simply must be true that the weaponization of this silly riot will come back to haunt all those Democrats who have misused it...... As with people and bad behavior, eventually it comes back to you......JMHO

A valid observation. When one considers the importance of identity verification documents in our every day lives.....with no mention from the leftists about this predicament....ever..... And then all the sudden the tilt toward requiring it for voting and then rise up and are incensed? Why only voting? Why not for the rest of the things in life that having those docs ensure? We already know why.....

US officials describe ‘productive’ meeting with Mexico as Biden feels pressure over migrant crisis So is the administration suddenly now willing to admit what people have been loudly bemoaning now for years? That the border is in fact a problem? That unfettered immigration is a problem? What are we now to do with Mayorkas? He has either been outright lying to congress or is thoroughly inept. We already know exactly what has transpired. The tsunami of regular people, regular voters, are polling now so negatively for him that he is willing to risk the wrath of the radicals and attempt some appeasement toward the people he was SUPPOSED to have been serving all along.....but did not.

Interesting.....you associate MY take above with being bad, but are apparently willing to allow yourself the luxury to employ similar logic, with a strawman. I am actually very much OK with people who are unable to have the basic form of documentation we all need everyday for everything......the ability to vote. If you are too inept to secure things required for employment and other basic elements of presence in society, then I would actually prefer you NOT vote.... Now, in Georgia they put in place some simple protections for election integrity, and of course this is a problem for Democrats....we can speculate as to why...... So even MLB stepped in and move one of their silly games as a result.....and everyone was trying to sell this as some sort of attack on AA voters.....and all they did in the next election was vote in record high numbers....so if its true that protecting the sanctity of our election process is somehow "wrong" and impedes voting....and for some reason will magically hurt AA's disproportionately....the one proof seems to have proven what we all knew from the jump....it is a lie to suggest that voter ID requirements deny voting...

I see no issue in producing some document that proves ones identity, I do not associate the requirement as being outlandish in any way, nor unfair to any specific group. Moreover, we have observed that the entire notion has been disproven as well.

Perhaps. I am willing to concede that it could be. But I do not observe the same concern for those in Appalachia.nor on reservations....nor any other group....save for African Americans.....the implicit inference being that ONLY they will have a problem.....and this entire notion was directly refuted in Georgia of course, because this notion is racist and false.....and the people showed us as much

Facts are anathema to mental illness and those afflicted. Standard logic and truth has to be changed to meet the unusual variance found among the mentally ill. So what do you do when the real world refutes your fantasy? You change terms and such, modify logic and when challenged you declare the critic to be hateful, racist....phobic to silence them into submission.

It seems as though the position of liberals is that requiring an ID is only somehow unfair if your skin is darker....which is of course....racist....but hey, a leopard cannot change its spots after all

So then you and I can find common ground on this point. Would you consider this behavior to then exclude that candidate from office?

Candace is not alone, but there are not enough people standing up to the racism of liberalism. I love it when she objects to being told she is incapable because of the color of her skin.

I feel bad for these kids, this indoctrination is not good for anyone in reality.