RLLD

Conversely, I think it absurd you do not see this filth as a terrorist..... So here we are, agreeing to disagree on what he is what should be done with him. Hopefully, he is just the first of many to be removed.

In my opinion his support for Hamas is enough to consider him a terrorist. I do not require your concurrence, nor that of anyone else to hold that opinion.

I say leave him alone. The Democrats put him in place knowing full well hw did not have the mental capacity for the role. It was elder abuse. He probably wont live much longer. Dementia is a horrible disease.

Assuming this goes to court, I guess they have to prove it in that setting. But they do not need to unless the terrorist finds someone to file suit. And I have NO problem with the state dept removing guests who have demonstrated a threat to other americans. In fact I insist they do this.

Thank you for demonstrating intellectual honesty.

It should....but clearly it does not. We have folks on this very forum, who are actively seeking to defend that POS..... Isn't it bad enough that we have our own racists right here? Do we really need imports?

I don't know what they are paying him, but its not enough. For him, its like trying to maintain order in a kindergarten school room. Some of the .....most .....focking....stupid....things.....I have hear, have been stated by CNN people.....and he often does a reasonable job of correcting them....until they shriek at him....like vampires before a cross....the truth seems to hurt them Dood needs to negotiate a badass contract.....and ensure it includes PTSD therapy...

Welfare, which is something I see as a necessary evil, is for the exclusive use of OUR citizens....period...end of story.

It does not make any sense to me as a literal move. I do not think they want that. I do not think we could reasonably achieve that. If we can then agree, for the moment, that the entire premise is just not likely....then we are left with the art of the deal, and this is just another feint.....

Maybe its not that simple. Maybe this is the tipping point at which Democrats can now fight their radicals, and take back leadership of the party on the part of sane and reasonable liberals..... What Chuckie boy just did, is bigger than it means, IMHO

I think we can all get behind defending the right of people to protest and speak their mind, I doubt any of us would really oppose that. I need to clarify, liberals will always oppose the speech of non-believers...so yeah, they HAVE and WANT to always silence their opponents. So....all these morons out there supporting Palestine....I mean, ok, whatever.... BUT....when they voice support for Hamas.....or intimidate/threaten/harm Jews....that is different.

I have to ask. Now that a Democrat is proposing a Civil War, are we still mocking the idea?

I profess that I am a little surprised that Schumer decided to back down on this shutdown. Democrats are all about the immediacy of things, and sure he and many of his cult have in pat years shouted to the sky of the evils of a shutdown.....only to threaten it here.....since it would now feed their political power.....you see, Democrats only ever take action to feed their power. I think we should really look at this move as significant. Schumer could not have actually stopped this CR, but he could have really focked the country up to placate the radical elements. His refusal to do this shutdown should be seen as a rather positive thing, for everyone.....because it means that the non-radical components of the party might be making a comeback.

One would think. But he clearly imbued the sense of entitlement that one is taught at these institutions. I see him as a terrorism advocate, though I doubt he would actually act. Taking action requires courage, and that is simply not present at our institutions of higher learning. Unless it is one of the service academies.

Yes, they did get a terrorist. It is good and just that weak men like you never reach positions of authority.

Are you trying to sell me that here today....YOU suddenly care about selective accountability? Well, that is pretty rich. Later, as they get more of the terrorists, I presume your "concern" will then migrate from this apparent worry for selective enforcement, and then perhaps pretend you care about overall enforcement? Lets wait and see. Since the State Dept has the authority, as granted by Congress, I do not see an issue.....yet....and if they were to replicate the improper use of law as was done to Trump, I would of course move my position more into your lane. That would be nice, right? Your political cult adherence would temporarily align with actual morality.

It is indeed in court, and I have no issue with that. If the ability of that terrorist to seek a judicial reversal of his fate is available to him, then by all means use it. He need not be detained for "a crime" that is not how the Act is worded, so that is just irrelevant. Now, I would hope that ANY person would want this piece of filth gone from our nation, but i also accept that there are those who do not care about others and what can happen to them. So.....your issue is then primarily with the Act passed by Congress, and I think that is fair. Your best bet is to contact your elected representatives and demand they deal with it and fix it.

Yes. it does. I posted the Act, and the specific section, in this thread..... I absolutely call out people being vile, and the correlation between these Liberal allies who promote Anti-Semitism is absolutely Nazi-esque and you know it. If this were those idiot redneck racists doing it, you would (well, you might not if its not politically useful).....oppose it.

Here, let me help you a little. They are using an act of congress to do this, which affords the state dept the latitude to do this. I know the immediate response is usually Nazi-terrets from the left, but that is not your best approach here. If you really want to ensure this terrorist can still terrorize, and perhaps even facilitate the murder of, Jews....your better move here is to attack the designation of terrorist. Not the proper implementation of their authority. THAT is where you get make some hay.

They have all lied so much, for so long, and their lies have been exposed so well.....that people simply wont watch them any more.

And yet, that is the accusation....awww, you want that to not be true so much.....poor little guy

Yes, we will deport terrorists who are non-citizens, whether those terrorist are committing violent acts or just promoting them, 100%. For those who are citizens, they can see their day in court.

If you intend to go down the path of having me repost the answers already provided....to YOU....already.... in this thread....no, not today sir.

I did get a chuckle from CNN having to report that Trumps actions are improving the economy.... ouch! You know that killed them

If you find the law irritating, contact your elected representative to have it changed.