RLLD

This is not correct. They are free to pretend to their hearts content. Thier biology, and with it the natural factors involved, will not change. Sure they can take pills, or desicrate their bodies...or just dress up.....that is just fine.... But they remain as they were created, regardless. I mean, its mostly harmless. But don't expect everyone to play along with the pretend stuff....

I suspect it might be true that the Democrats were so keen to hide the full video to avoid the minimalization of those who did engage in acts that were inappropriate. I surmise that would likely be their rationale..... I do hope that for them(Democrats), there is some effort to exclude exculpatory evidence if THEY ever face prosecution..... unless it is of course....."rules for thee"

I was not aware of any of their "politics", from where do you secure this information?

That would be a racist assumption, as is the notion that historically marginalized communities cannot compete without help.

You make salient points. But.....we simply must continue to be the peoples of true morality, toward that end we cannot allow lives to be chess pieces as Islamists are inclined. It is always unwise to negotiate with terrorists, but lets get these people back, and then get back to it. This is a battle of good vs evil, lets not become the evil we seek to challenge.

Yes, but they realized very quickly they were caught....and some of them are standing up to the radicals. You see, their radicals are shock troops.....and are permitted to do vile things while liberals smirk and pretend not to notice....but when it hurts their potential access to power, they merely take a more central position. Interestingly, they do not yet appreciate the genie they have been in bed with....nor the consequences of the allowance for evil as it was useful to them......

Overdue

Modern Liberalism is indeed all of this, and has evolved into a religion of hate....and yet still seems intent to defend itself as some kind of moral entity. They essentially mirror radical Islam

Agree completely

The attempt to search and find something was flawed, then the attempt to squeeze what they had into these spurious interpretations of the law was ill-advised. But make no mistake, they will just keep trying....and their efforts will become ever more desperate and by extension ridiculous. But they have apparently convinced themselves that Trump is some kind of existential threat and a danger to Democracy And given that aspect, they are able to justify their actions, no matter how outside rationality or legality they might be.

All fair points toward whick I doubt you would elicit much debate. Truth is only a "trope" when it offends the tender feelings of the historically marginalized.

I might suggest we take a wait and see approach...... These Central/South American leaders rarely prove to be much good.

If you now decide to abandon this approach to permit violence, I think we will all understand.....

You offering a geek-meet? j/k

I used to be there. But, over time I have come to better appreciate the role of unions. Are they corrupt? You bet your sweet arse they are..... but they have also given us a range of pretty good situations today, ALL of us benefit from union-related actions of the past. SO....what do we do then? Well, we can agree that public school is struggling, and in part due to union-related factors..... so those of us who can step away from it should. But then we are leaving many people behind to fend for themselves. Generally speaking, teachers work hard and care. The schools are rather well funded. But the kids are not putting in the effort. And rather than challenge them, we lower standards. So we are dooming these kids by acquiecing to their own laziness. Parents are the real problem here.

No. Nor will he be. Once again the Democrats, through their weaponization of the legal system, are overshooting.... Could they secure some outcome in one of these instances? Probably. Would that outcome be overturned? Absolutely. None of this is about "law" it is about preventing the election of someone they hate. Someone who is completely unlikable to be sure.....but also rather effective in creating positive results. Democrats would rather have a fake "good guy" in office who ruins the lives of regular folks so long as he adheres to their religious edicts......than an effective man who is a choad but gets positive results.

OK, then by your logic you have just refuted your own assertion since HT is not leading anyone...... And that is the problem you have, liberal ideology will make these sweeping assertions based on correlation. Trump says something that some other idiot said...well then Trump is a racist and Republicans are anti-immigration..... This simply must stop..... just because someone objects to something YOU believe does not make them evil.....

Since I am from the east coast that will not be a problem

When it serves a unions political matriculations....sure.... or when Hamas flying their animalistic SS troops into Israel.....

So then, by your example I can therefore use the words of Talib to paint the Democrats as anti-semites..... of course not, that would be immature and illogical..... So lets not do this....

Not exactly. What they object to is the mass importation of people with no place for them to go or jobs for them to fill. We simply must control immigration. What arises is that ANY attempt to control it is paraded as "anti immigrant" or "racist" so as to impugn any opposition to unfettered immigration. There is nothing wrong with a controlled border.

We can agree to disagree on this "MAGA" assertion. It is not different at all, though I do understand the lies propogated by Democrats and their propogandists in the media like to use this. I would encourage you to pause before believing any of them, and not digest any of it as simple truth. MAGA is little more than empowering the middle and lower classes back to their status of prominence. But this is anathema to Democrats.

This logic.....this is where I bristle with the liberal approach to "thinking". The immediate move to assert motive in this manner is entirely counter-productive. If this were turned around on some position YOU held, you would be justifiably indignant. It's just not the way we should operate as a society. Republicans are not anti-immigrant, but they do acknowledge the dangers and consequences of allowing uncontrolled immigration as has been done. I know there is is notion of empathy to those emigrating, but this is at the expense of our citizens own well-being. Elevating the empathy toward immigrants over our own folks is not how this should be done. This is not "anti-immigrant" this is how a reasoned and compassionate people should approach the needs of their own citizens as a priority.

A rather good example of the important distinction between knowledge and wisdom.

As much as I try I find it challenging to understand Cheney. I am not clear as to what it really is she is standing for or against. Much of what she espouses is difficult to assemble into any kind of pholosophical standard. She seems to flitter from idea to idea with no real congruent philosophy. She is odd in many ways. I think her heart is in it....but her mind seems to be all over the place.