RLLD

Which one?

As long as it is not in front of MY 6 year old, then yeah, all good.....

Incorrect. They have so far executed properly. McCarthy has so far been staying within the lines There is also a clear path forward, again...so far More Now, all that being said..... lets watch this closely....and warily....if at any time these choads start straying into the actions that the Democrats have previously used, then we should be calling them out; and frankly calling their offices to protest. It was wrong when the Democrats abused this mechanism and if the Republicans dare to do the same, then it will still be wrong....and they should be challenged on it. I know the media will do so, I am thoroughly confident of this....the only and always hold Republicans accountable....its the Dems who typically get away withg too much

I might tend to disagree. They were preaching impeachment from the start, it was part and parcel of their goals. First they actively impeded the process to certify the election, I guess back then it was not such a big deal.... Then to bring their point home further, they boycotted the inauguration...which is silly, but whatever... Then they made a move to try and oust him using the 25th amendment, because they care so very deeply about the "presidents abilitly" to do his job..... I note that same concern seems no where to be found as we watch the doddering Biden stumble verbally and physically... And then you had Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said: "The president is a criminal. ... This criminal must be brought up by the Congress of the United States for impeachment." AOC even said "day one" Trump committed and impeachable for allegedly violating the emoluments clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits all persons holding federal office from accepting "any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." Which by the way, we know Biden himself has done now....so....there is that... Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, wanted Trump impeached for his "racist tweets" , sooooooo then that means we take down Biden for HIS obviously racist statements?

And why not? I note that you made no mention of the man who took the opportunity away, you only denigrated the premise for the woman, almost as if you found a woman pursuing a goal to be silly.....

That some parent would do so is neither here nor there for you and I, nor relevant to the point; Men are stealing opportunities from women

Right...... I am surprised anyone thinks this matters.... if there were direct evidence.....we would be impeaching.....but because there have been impediments to verifying the obvious.....you hold an inquiry......because this is how it is done. You should not refer back to the abusive usage of impeachments as executed by the Democrats, instead sit back and what how the process is intended to work.

First day of inquiry went pretty much as one might expect. I was a little surprised that the Republicans showed so much evidence right from the jump, I felt they revealed a little too much and now the Democrats will have some idea as to how they can fabricate excuses for the criminal activity. I felt that was not well done. In general I was impressed that the Republicans mostly stayed "adult" even in the face of substantial childishness; there were a few folks who seemed to stray after being taunted by Democrats. What I did not perhaps anticipate, but should have, was the avoidance of Democrats to face down evidence and situational instances. They pointedly avoided trying to explain away the obvious circumstantial connections. But the part that really stood out about that avoidance was the "what about isms". Trotting out pictures of Trumps kids......as if to say, "hey look they did it too!!!".....I felt that was sorta weak. Primarily because one could look at it as excusing the behaviors....

I agree, would add that women who support or even allow it are in those ranks as well. To allow these things to happen to women in modern society defies anything this country stands for. Its repugnant.

Some of them are standing up, but lets be frank....to stand up to this is to stand up to the Democrat Party and it ranks of liberal religious fanatics, and with that to face person, professional and public demagoguery. Those few women who have stood up to this, have faced the wrath of the liberal cult shock troops. They are very brave, I would hope I would have the same strength. Women have to lead this. And when our women do stand up, we need to be right by their side. We have to do it this way to mute the inclination of liberals to label things. To label the entire pursuit as a "white male patriarchy" or some other bullsh!t.....they cannot defend the stance, so they attack the people. I think too much male involvement right now would provide additional weaponization for those liberals who seek to remove opportunities from our women.

Maybe......I am not sure. I really think that women have to stand up to this, but we as men need to have their backs as well. This is not hurting you and I, but it could impact our daughters. This game is hurting women, and maybe it can be stopped when enough women are hurt that they rise up as they have in the past to push back against the harm to them.

Imagine your daughter had worked for years to pursue this competition, and a man strides in and takes the award..... smh

Let's not forget that this was compassion for that poor man, who was clearly harmed by our corrupt system.....

Fair enough. I would then add that anything....and I say emphatically....anything...... Joe Biden says should be first seen as an outright lie and should be proven true before we consider it anything else.

There is another element to this line of argument that I am patiently waiting to be used, not going to play it out, willing to wait since it sets up another point that refutes his argument even further. Sorry for being mysterious, but liberals happily walk into logic traps and I prefer not give them opportunity to avoid it

Maybe there were just so entitled that they deserved it

I have provided them, and I used YOUR logic to do so by the way. So how does that feel?

Correct. And from the urban areas, to Appalachia to the midwest...poverty hits a variety of people across the spectrum, and it hits due to factors that do not include race as the primary driver. This we can easily see. What I think is distinctive is that the government is not out in those other areas taking actions that result in worse outcomes.

I think Gutter is not worthless. I think any racist deserves a shot at redemption, we cannot just discard people because they make a mistake.

I amlost missed this.....you are almost being truthful here. And as a result I am going to be a fair participant (that means I wont use your immature antics). I submit there is much more to this than your oversimplified depiction. That there are multiple influences. And those influences start with government, now you can pretend the Democrats have done no harm all you want, but to my eyes they are pointedly harmful. We have a clear idea as to what it takes to escape poverty. So then, its a problem derived from complex factors, but has a rather simple solution.

Nice try, your words are only too clear. No it's not, there are factors.  First, in order for it to be racist by most definitions, then then your race would have to be a minority or disadvantaged status.  I'm assuming you're white, so we'll take that off the table.  Next, what is the reasoning.  Do they want someone who is non white, because whites are inferior to other races, then yes that would be racist.  Or do they want non whites because they are currently mostly white, and they are looking for some different traits, experiences and knowledge that other races might be able to provide?  Not racist. And tell you what, lets use the definition YOU provided for fun So YOU see race as the factor....... YOU delineate peoples place by race, and that makes YOU.......a racist..... Now you may want to trot around and point your finger everywhere else, and try to pretend and project all you want.....but we know very well what you are, and we can see the damage people like you are capable of to these folks....

Let's start with this statement first, and more....much more....will follow.... 1) You automatically assume "minority" = disadvantaged, but we know very well this is not true. So you are equating their place based on their race. Then you assumed someone was white, and then based your assessment of their place on that factor....the color of their skin, when we know very well that there are plenty of folks spanning a range of factors who are disadvantaged. Selecting people as you are suggesting, based on their traits instead of their merits, is textbook racism.....from the origins of the Democrat party.

I think it was something of a failed attempt at correlation in order to poke fun at the dogma of "representation". Often the positions of liberals fail when applied more broadly, and can come back to haunt them in unexpected ways. Sometimes it can be fun to put situations next to each other to highlight the problem with the logic, though it can tend to undervalue the seriousness of the negative outcomes from these policies...

Lying about what I said will get you nothing. If YOU decide to translate my words into something else that simply further defines YOU, not merely as a liar but it also reinforced your racist thoughts. Projection, you are little more than a child pretending to be a man, and projecting that on others. Your behavior is demonstrative of immaturity. The more you post your vile thoughts, the less you are seen to be.