RLLD

Give me the same zeal in pursuit of Biden, that is all I ask. If it can be done to Trump then it can be done to Biden. I want ALL PEOPLE in power the same treatment. If people are to hold power, they need to be watched and held accountable. <insert name> should be held to account, regardless of political affiliation. The difference between you and I is that while I support what was done to Trump, you would defend Biden from it. Sadly this allows the corruption.

Perhaps I am not clear as to what it is you are asking/ Can you elaborate?

As many as you like can be in an array. We can start with the New York Times and CNN. Purportedly these are journalists, but we know better. Move on into your Google, and look around. Part of me is actually gratified that someone seems to care about the content in music, given the abundance of inappropriate material provided through music over the decades.

Are you suggesting that the approach used by Democrats against Trump is no longer suitable. On this point we will have to agree to disagree. Investigate by all means, people in power should be watched, investigated and held accountable. That you might not feel this way is perhaps not the best approach. We have MORE information, and even evidence, than the Democrats had when they went after Trump. It seems fitting to give Joe the same level of scruitiny, given the abundance of evidence.

His protectors at the FBI in particular must cringe anytime he talks. The leadership who protected him might never be held to account, but history will mark them for the corrupt puppets they certainly are.

No. in summary there is enough evidence to continue the investigation and potentially assign a special prosecutor (but I hope they do NOT assign one). There is more evidence than was available for say, the first fake impeachment for Trump. But again, unless the criminal has the wrong political stance you will not care about criminality, we have established this. More will come out, nothing short of a confession from Biden will ever suffice for you. Not sure why people are inclined to protect the powerful, when they are clearly corrupt. That one will continue to be baffling.

If Democrats believe their position is so correct, then they should proudly and happily embrace this. But I think they are only too aware of the sickness of this and are terrified about the truth being available to Americans.

I found it satisfying.

God help these folks if there is a David Allen Coe song on the radio

I am a fan of country music, not all of it, but a decent portion of it. This song is OK, would be rather low on my playlist etc. But we cannot ignore how virulently some of the players on the left have reacted to it. To me....the song clearly is saying....hey you want to burn and loot and sh!t? come try that in my town......and you will get your arse handed to you....I really think it is alluding to that.... I think the way it is being defended is disingenuous, JMHO

I never suggested they have yet completed the investigation, and "proven" it went to Joe, in fact 5 went to Hunter and it is clear the other 5 went to Joe. If you want to ignore this, and what it clearly means, that is fine for you. I am not going to convince you of anything here. I accept that because of your allegience to political ideology (and by extension Joe Biden) you will ignore what is right in front of you. More proof will come, and you will ignore that as well. It is clear, to me, based on the available informaton that the DOJ worked diligently to protect the Biden family from their criminal activity. You can ignore that as well. Later.....should it arise that the DOJ clearly protects, oh lets say Donald Trump, perhaps then we can enjoy a shared experience around caring about criminal activity.

It is indeed, for some of us.

Oh absolutely. I find that one amusing as well. Anyone who allows political chicanery to rule their daily life is just a toy of the powerful.

I am confused as to why he let that dog go on the guy, seems out of band for the situation.

I am just entertained by it all. I find it more amusing than anything else. The array of leftists who sought to shut this song down is just completely amusing.

Hold on, are we now allowed to impugne law enforcement again? I thought we had to just accept they always did the right thing, were essentially infallable?

They are not done yet, so far they can only prove about 10 million, according to the reporting. But the Burisma folks admitted that the complexity of the Biden setup with the LLC's would take something like 10 years to unwind. I have no doubt it will be trickey and take some time. This is why I am assiduously opposed to the DOJ assigning a special prosecutor, should that happen we likely never get the truth.

I think we need all the Bud Light "its just a beer can" folks to step up here and defend this thing since "its just a song" and what not.

Of course the links do not satisfy, and I would not presume tha any of the banking evidence, testimony or prety much anything else would suffice for you to admit what is easily evident. I get that. You will stand by a political ally, no matter what.

The links have been posted. And I will add, the Democrats are not refuting the evidence at all.....they are only trying to suggest the evidence is showing something "OK" or "normal". When it clearly is not. Now if you are saying you would NOT be in here raising your alarm about Trump I will accept that on its face.

So then, I ask again, and I truly want an answer this time. If this evidence.....pointed instead toward Trump and his son, you would also then suggest there is nothing worth pursuing? Please answer this.

The problem might be that you are not entirely up to date on the information being harvested. But the factor of most media outlets suppressing it could be part of that reason for this. I continue to raise the "hypotheticals" in an earnest desire to help you see your bias, and then perhaps we can talk about the danger of allowing criminality based on political ideology. I suggest that there is enough evidence to dig more, I am not convicting anyone.....well, perhaps I am somewhat convicting the leadership of the DOJ for their blatant political shikanery.

This investigation is no more of a "sham"than those applied to Trump. Were this situation to arise and the participants to be the Trump family, my position would be the same. Your allowance for criminality, depending on your personal political motivations, is where I surmise you and I diverage. Were this situation applied to Trump, you and I would likely be arm-in-arm.....and you would view me as some kind of ally....though that would not exactly be true, would it? The evidence shows clear here. It might not be associated the the right political person for you, but the criminality remains.