RLLD

If you no longer support the "either condemn or you support it" mantra, please do tell, because later when you try to use it I will be ready to link your position. This is the problem with liberals, your malleable morality means that the stuff you used yesterday, can be turned on you today. Its like trying to remember a lie, its easier to just treat all situations the same.

Right. Maybe stop using lazy logic.......

You posted your standard bullsh!it, I posted in a manner that highlighted it, now your pVssy hurta mr pillow pants?

It is true. And if you are interested I would encourage reading Deliver the Vote: A History of Election Fraud, an American Political Tradition-1742-2004 by Tracy Campbell. It details how fraud has evolved and improved over time. So it CAN happen, and we SHOULD always be securing our elections. Now, back to your point that fraud has diminished in step with lower minority voting, I would like to learn more about that.

Not a false analogy, and shame on you for trying to pretend that. Unless you and he b!tched about it what all those folks did the same thing, you are also a focking hypocrit. So if its so wrong, complain when ever it happens, and stop justifying it like that.

Not lashing out, pointing out. I see it as important to show people what you are, lest they read your words and think there is anything useful to be found. So you cried about election denial, and I clarified that you are just an immature provacatuer with no actual value, merit or honestly. Other should be aware.

I think it could be true that Booker, being a decpicably POS and typical liberal, can see that Schumer is ripe for the take down.... and HE wants the power.

No, election denying is either wrong or its acceptable, for you.....only wrong if you can paint it against your ideological opponents....your morality is performative, malleable and fake. Yoou pretend to care only if you can scratch some narcissistic itch. My hope is that people will see you post, know you are a focking liar, and play with you in a manner commensurate with your lack of maturity.

No, Trump is Trump, that you would create some distinction between Trump and any other of these election deniers is just something I was hoping to highlight, in case people forget who or what you are.

We cannot afford to lose congress. Democrats have shown they will abuse every process and system within reach. Notably, they abused the impeachment process. I presume that they would once again recklessly abuse that process. When in power the Democrats have demonstrated they will stop at nothing.....and ruthlessly pursue power, crushing all before them if needed. Protecting us from the modern Democrat party is an absolute imperative.

I might suggest Stahl lost her credibility when she protected Biden from his sons laptop, so this move on her part seems congruent.

Don't be silly, elections can only be questioned when a Republican wins.

Voting fraud has happened in the past. It was far worse before we took action to better secure how we vote. So the act of protecting elections has worked, and should be sustained and improved to ensure protections. If you are suggesting that the protections are working and as a result we seem to have fewer minority voters, then I think we need to really look at that. It would appear, based on what you posted, that the protecting of our voting system means less fraud due to fewer minorities voting, I would like to better understand how fraud and minority voting move together.

Democrats have little to celebrate, let them have a something.

And most cops dont hate or abuse black people, but we still burn stuff when one does, right?

One day, you will have a tangible response. Until then, we wait, patiently.

My longstanding issue with media is that they only seem to do their job when a Republican is in office and we all deserve the same level of effort regardless of who is residing in the White House. On top of that stance, now we see media trying to reframe the entire situation to pretend they were not complicit, and note that they are also throwing the Harris campaign under the bus a little, which is BS.

Sure. I guess we might call it "click bait" or something. My main issue being that the two authors are members of the media who participating in the cover up. So we have Tapper over at CNN pretending he was a victim and now we have these two deflecting their role by pointing at behaviors of others. Media owned the role to report honestly on this, and THEY failed, all these things are just attempts to let themselves off the hook.

Correct. Democrats have o substance, none, zero. Their only "product" is opposing Trump They offer nothing but performative outrage. They are essentially useless.

Given the product produced, that being these moronic people, those worthless papers should be torn up

Has he weighed on the NBA yet?

Booker is a male Kamala Harris. Empty of anything real or meaningful. Ready to say what ever the room might like.

Not an issue, I understand the inclination to latch on to the political over the actual. I am trying to move him toward a conversation.

Yes and no. I try to be as fair as possible, and call out only the real elements. In this instance am I going to fault Biden? No....that is not reasonable IMHO. The people around Biden, who propped him up, who were really running the show are the ones we should consider "the problem". But setting that aside. The media are supposed to advocate on our behalf to hold power accountable. Instead they collaborated with those people behind the scenes propping Biden up. The did not serve the people in their role. Yet now they want to portray themselves as victims, and I call BS on that.