RLLD

I found it satisfying.

God help these folks if there is a David Allen Coe song on the radio

I am a fan of country music, not all of it, but a decent portion of it. This song is OK, would be rather low on my playlist etc. But we cannot ignore how virulently some of the players on the left have reacted to it. To me....the song clearly is saying....hey you want to burn and loot and sh!t? come try that in my town......and you will get your arse handed to you....I really think it is alluding to that.... I think the way it is being defended is disingenuous, JMHO

I never suggested they have yet completed the investigation, and "proven" it went to Joe, in fact 5 went to Hunter and it is clear the other 5 went to Joe. If you want to ignore this, and what it clearly means, that is fine for you. I am not going to convince you of anything here. I accept that because of your allegience to political ideology (and by extension Joe Biden) you will ignore what is right in front of you. More proof will come, and you will ignore that as well. It is clear, to me, based on the available informaton that the DOJ worked diligently to protect the Biden family from their criminal activity. You can ignore that as well. Later.....should it arise that the DOJ clearly protects, oh lets say Donald Trump, perhaps then we can enjoy a shared experience around caring about criminal activity.

It is indeed, for some of us.

Oh absolutely. I find that one amusing as well. Anyone who allows political chicanery to rule their daily life is just a toy of the powerful.

I am confused as to why he let that dog go on the guy, seems out of band for the situation.

I am just entertained by it all. I find it more amusing than anything else. The array of leftists who sought to shut this song down is just completely amusing.

Hold on, are we now allowed to impugne law enforcement again? I thought we had to just accept they always did the right thing, were essentially infallable?

They are not done yet, so far they can only prove about 10 million, according to the reporting. But the Burisma folks admitted that the complexity of the Biden setup with the LLC's would take something like 10 years to unwind. I have no doubt it will be trickey and take some time. This is why I am assiduously opposed to the DOJ assigning a special prosecutor, should that happen we likely never get the truth.

I think we need all the Bud Light "its just a beer can" folks to step up here and defend this thing since "its just a song" and what not.

Of course the links do not satisfy, and I would not presume tha any of the banking evidence, testimony or prety much anything else would suffice for you to admit what is easily evident. I get that. You will stand by a political ally, no matter what.

The links have been posted. And I will add, the Democrats are not refuting the evidence at all.....they are only trying to suggest the evidence is showing something "OK" or "normal". When it clearly is not. Now if you are saying you would NOT be in here raising your alarm about Trump I will accept that on its face.

So then, I ask again, and I truly want an answer this time. If this evidence.....pointed instead toward Trump and his son, you would also then suggest there is nothing worth pursuing? Please answer this.

The problem might be that you are not entirely up to date on the information being harvested. But the factor of most media outlets suppressing it could be part of that reason for this. I continue to raise the "hypotheticals" in an earnest desire to help you see your bias, and then perhaps we can talk about the danger of allowing criminality based on political ideology. I suggest that there is enough evidence to dig more, I am not convicting anyone.....well, perhaps I am somewhat convicting the leadership of the DOJ for their blatant political shikanery.

This investigation is no more of a "sham"than those applied to Trump. Were this situation to arise and the participants to be the Trump family, my position would be the same. Your allowance for criminality, depending on your personal political motivations, is where I surmise you and I diverage. Were this situation applied to Trump, you and I would likely be arm-in-arm.....and you would view me as some kind of ally....though that would not exactly be true, would it? The evidence shows clear here. It might not be associated the the right political person for you, but the criminality remains.

Of course they are "crazy" right now, and as with past examples that came true, it might be the case that your portrayal for this one does not age well. Rather than viewing this through the prism of your bias, your hatred of Trump is not equitable to others when they seek to hold Biden accountable. We should not be painted with a brush based on how YOU act. And yes, the DOJ is clearly not behaving well. That should concern all of us. And if it later arises that they can be proven to have been improper in actions toward a Democrat, its.....still....wrong.... So rather than pretend everyone else, notably me, thinks with the same kind of hatred and bias as you. Please allow that I am simply pointing out a clear problem. Now.....if it becomes clear that the Republicans are just doing the same illicit stuff the Democrats did....and i allow that it is absolutely plausible that they could be....that are all politicians after all. Then we can codemn THEM together. Because, unlike you, I am not bound in my stance by political ideology.

I might ask you to reconsider even the oblique ad hominem here. This tactic of suggesting people are crazy or conspiracy theorists has not really panned out well. Time and again, the people who have been on the receiving end of this tactic have been proven to be correct. And further, please self reflect on what it says about you when you claim something is so "out there" that you label it crazy, and then later its proven true.....that the people you seek to defend.....are so corrupt that their behaviors, later proven true, initially strike you as too crazy to be real.... Now. The DOJ is a profound impediment to all this. Their behavior suggests a rather active, and admittedly effective, protection of the Biden family. My biggest fear, right now, is the assignment of a special prosecutor. The FBI has been using the investigative doctrine in a manner to pointedly protect the Bidens. Once they assign a special prosecutor it is reasonable to expect that Merrick Garland will leverage it to silence any additional information for us.... he will then "investigate" as long as possible to defend the president from any accountability. I will restate here, and I ask you to answer honestly......switch this scenerio to Trump and Don jr........would you still be defending THEM?

I think it is a bad look here. The level of effort to cancel this guy is reminicent of how hard they work to cancel Trump. I think it is fear. I like how he points out their actions are demonstrative of religious zealotry and totatlitarianism.

It could be a pattern, you have just described the gambits used against Trump. So if it turns out to be true that Republicans are simply returning the favor in kind then that is a big problem. I hope they are not simpy mirroring Democrat actions, and frankly....I cannot say they are not doing this. Politics is the suck, and these people...all of them, should not be trusted. The only things that suggest it is real are the accounts of the whistleblowers, the texts from Hunter Biden and then the bank account transactions. I think the desire of the FBI to hide these internal Burisma content, and notably to not suggest it is not true, indicate they believe there is veracity to these assertions by these Burisma execs. There is certainly as much, and would assert MORE, information and evidence available than the Dems had on the first fake impeachment. Now, I am so far gratified that the Republicans are at least not being as reckless as the Democrats in pointlessly pursuing impeachment.

So they have information from within that company(Burisma?) asserting that Hunter was hired exclusively to leverage Joe to get after the prosecutor who Biden used USA funds to push for removal. And they have payments showing up in Biden accounts the week after Biden had the prosecutor removed.....

OK, I am NOT a fan of Hannity.....at all.... that being said, he lays out some of the key elements the DOJ worked rather hard to hide, and the content is indictative as to why they hid it.

Putting this here as I am aware that most media outlets are hiding the details of discovery around the Bidens and their criminal activities.