RLLD

Of course, the presence of these criminals...any harm they would pose...is someone else's problem.

Because taking the opposing position of Trump, regardless of the actual position, has been indoctrinated into many. He managed to use this phenomena to some effect so far, pinning Democrats into the 30-side of almost every issue. And cornering them in the halls like nothing we have seen before.

If this CR were actually anything at all to worry about we would have been hearing about it late last year, and all January and February.....the reason we heard about it recently.....was that the Dems wanted something to show they could stand up to Republicans, well toTrump.....but even then they knew they had been out maneuvered. So the party that has shouted to the sky for years of the evil that is shutting down the government, suddenly flirted with it.....because they thought it could be a political win, but then realized that they would likely shrink their already low popularity. So they stopped pretending the CR they helped create was a problem....and moved on. But do not forget the ease with which they were preparing to do THE THING.....they have always said.....was an absolute evil.......just to gain some political cred.....these are the people you champion here on this forearm

No. there are some cuts and some improvement....notably improvements to WIC.....but your ideological masters were hard selling you the notion that this thing was destructive, which of course it is not.... and take note they dropped that narrative when it became clear it was going to pass, and then told us the real problem as they saw it, they just needed to fight Trump. You must see it b now, even among political parties....for the history of this nation, the modern Democrat party is absolute corruption....

Their disagreement is that they see this as a political win for Trump, nothing more. They mouth off, pretend that the CR which THEY FOCKING CREATED and agreed to, is suddenly dangerous.....please.... at least some of the Democrats care enough to not prioritize politics over people

https://youtu.be/DV3wL5BT-mE

Seems like a suitable prioritization

The act of congress already has this position. I am gratified that the state dept is finally acting in accordance with that congressional act to intervene and protect us from these vile people

I don't understand the question.

That is fine for you, though I keep hearing about how dangerous "rhetoric" can be......

As you please. The less terrorists the better. Lets get as many as we can!!

Conversely, I think it absurd you do not see this filth as a terrorist..... So here we are, agreeing to disagree on what he is what should be done with him. Hopefully, he is just the first of many to be removed.

In my opinion his support for Hamas is enough to consider him a terrorist. I do not require your concurrence, nor that of anyone else to hold that opinion.

I say leave him alone. The Democrats put him in place knowing full well hw did not have the mental capacity for the role. It was elder abuse. He probably wont live much longer. Dementia is a horrible disease.

Assuming this goes to court, I guess they have to prove it in that setting. But they do not need to unless the terrorist finds someone to file suit. And I have NO problem with the state dept removing guests who have demonstrated a threat to other americans. In fact I insist they do this.

Thank you for demonstrating intellectual honesty.

It should....but clearly it does not. We have folks on this very forum, who are actively seeking to defend that POS..... Isn't it bad enough that we have our own racists right here? Do we really need imports?

I don't know what they are paying him, but its not enough. For him, its like trying to maintain order in a kindergarten school room. Some of the .....most .....focking....stupid....things.....I have hear, have been stated by CNN people.....and he often does a reasonable job of correcting them....until they shriek at him....like vampires before a cross....the truth seems to hurt them Dood needs to negotiate a badass contract.....and ensure it includes PTSD therapy...

Welfare, which is something I see as a necessary evil, is for the exclusive use of OUR citizens....period...end of story.

It does not make any sense to me as a literal move. I do not think they want that. I do not think we could reasonably achieve that. If we can then agree, for the moment, that the entire premise is just not likely....then we are left with the art of the deal, and this is just another feint.....

Maybe its not that simple. Maybe this is the tipping point at which Democrats can now fight their radicals, and take back leadership of the party on the part of sane and reasonable liberals..... What Chuckie boy just did, is bigger than it means, IMHO

I think we can all get behind defending the right of people to protest and speak their mind, I doubt any of us would really oppose that. I need to clarify, liberals will always oppose the speech of non-believers...so yeah, they HAVE and WANT to always silence their opponents. So....all these morons out there supporting Palestine....I mean, ok, whatever.... BUT....when they voice support for Hamas.....or intimidate/threaten/harm Jews....that is different.

I have to ask. Now that a Democrat is proposing a Civil War, are we still mocking the idea?

I profess that I am a little surprised that Schumer decided to back down on this shutdown. Democrats are all about the immediacy of things, and sure he and many of his cult have in pat years shouted to the sky of the evils of a shutdown.....only to threaten it here.....since it would now feed their political power.....you see, Democrats only ever take action to feed their power. I think we should really look at this move as significant. Schumer could not have actually stopped this CR, but he could have really focked the country up to placate the radical elements. His refusal to do this shutdown should be seen as a rather positive thing, for everyone.....because it means that the non-radical components of the party might be making a comeback.

One would think. But he clearly imbued the sense of entitlement that one is taught at these institutions. I see him as a terrorism advocate, though I doubt he would actually act. Taking action requires courage, and that is simply not present at our institutions of higher learning. Unless it is one of the service academies.