RLLD

If you maintain that the legal actions against Trump were legitimate, and yet challenge this one, yeah, your position is rather maleable.

Words are only violence if those words in any way challenge a liberal position.....otherwise, those who refuse to submit to liberalism get violence because they deserve it.....sorry, not my rulz

Hold the phone, gutter has ALWAYS held the title of whiniest b!tch ever on thie forearm. And there isnt a close second.

I tend to agree with you. Here is the rub. Almost every legal maneuver of late seems like trite nonsense, to include (and perhaps especially) those lobbed at Trump. Your position on the validity of legal action seems to ebb ad flow based on the political currency. But, since it arises that, if only temporarily due to your political bias, we find ourselves in cadence on the topic.....I like to show where we share agreement.

Perhaps I misunderstood your position.

I think you are revising your position here. You know very well that you were pretending that Trump was going to lower prices on day one, because that was one of him campaign promises.....and so you want to suggest people were stupid for voting for him, based on that one singular point. Maybe this conversation is making that assertion less comfortable for you? I mean, if that is the case then its a good thing, it speaks to your character.

I disagree, but only because Trump as a candidate really started under Obama ad before Clinton was a candidate. Now, agree completely on the left flipping out. Its notable that the left used lamentation about chaos under Trump as a reason to not vote for him......yeah, THEIR focking chaos....so their stance was, dont vote for Trump or else....

I see the merit in your opinion. I might counter with the idea that Trump being elected was actually a response to what Obama did. It was the actions of Obama that led us to Trump.

What do you hope to gain by acting this way?

I see. So then your goal is to highlight discrepancies, to pronounce evidence that would tend to impugn Trump, where it arises. And then through this maneuver you hope to enhance the ability of the Democrat Party to secure power. I get that. I have to admit that some of my stances are not that far from your own. By way of example, for all those months and months Democrats and their media puppets were trying to sell the lie of a good economic situation and I implored them to keep doing it, louder and louder, because I understood just how much it was p!ssing off voters, and in the end Trump could win as a result. So I get it completely. I guess in this instance, I am going back to the well. I think this manuever on your part, and the wider Democrat Party, is only p!ssing people off, so by all means....please keep doing it....hell, but a billboard somewhere near a highway, just make it clear that is DEMOCRATS sending that message, please....

I recall that he was pardoned. This was not an action taken for no reason, he is a vile creature.

Spot on. Putin would love to pull Ukraine back into the Russian domain, no question. I think he miscalculated on this endeavor. But his long term goal would likely be to see Ukraine at least be a puppet state serving Russia

I do look back and see that the Obama admin introduced a turn in our society, and not for the better.

I agree in part. That he would not bring them down day 1. And what do you presume you are achieving by hanging on this point?

My mistake, I presumed you were reading news reporting... here you go https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-tesla-biden-federal-contract-electric-vehicles-donald-trump-f8f5b07d03f6e0c9d072abd69feedec4

Yes, I think your point has merit. And I think they are justifiably pissed that Biden needlessly fomented inflation then lied about it. But we are less than a month into the current presidency, should Trump have as much time or less than Biden did to fix the issue? How long....in your opinion...should it take to "fix" inflation that has been thrust into the economy?

Maddow made a false assertion, I mean, what are you trying to do here....

A fair point.

Biden did not pardon Mayorkas....... that seems to me, to be a mistake.

I guess I can see your point of view. But, your POV would make more sense if Trump had not run on this very thing, and setup DOGE months ago to engage it. This is that rare circumstance where a politician promises something and does it. Consider, if you will, how the average voted might look at this. The money amounts involved and the designation of that money. And then they hear Democrats decrying this being done. Its probably not the look a party who wants to return to power wants to have. JMHO

I am a little shocked that you require proof, but ok...

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/new-reporting-exposes-shocking-extent-of-musk-s-conflicts-as-he-dismantles-u-s-government-231737925908 She claims a conflict of interest.....on a contract that was established by Biden, months ago.....and was cancelled by Trump. As per usual, she lied without restraint.

I hope so, other than fixing the border, this is an absolutely priority in my want list.

Maddow just lied about Elon Musk, like bold faced outright easily disproven falsehoods.