RLLD

Misplaced sense of entitlement is a rather American thing.....more prominent among liberals to be sure, but really across the board.

I do not accept the AP's explanation for its disparity in application of its "values". They are gaslighting.....

It was....only the amount is really different. Trump did not create that plan, he pulled it up and changed it a little....this is not unknown. This thing has been around for decades. Trump cannot take credit for it......

Of course I am. In each instance you have a government decide to change the name, pretending they are different us letting the outlet off the hook. What if....the AP.....decided it would say.....capitalize the usage of "White People" in its reporting.....and only use lower case for "black people".....I think you and I could agree that we would be in opposition to that, right?

This is one example. I am confident that they could likely chase down more. They might not be able to get Schumer or Pelosi.....those two pit vipers are way too well schooled in the DC corruption game.

There is no reason to misrepresent what I said. Trumps gold card thing will replace the existing EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program established in 1990 which granted green cards to foreign investors who invested a minimum of $1.05 million in U.S. businesses and created or preserved at least 10 full-time jobs. The new gold card program requires a $5 million investment from wealthy foreigners, providing them with permanent residency and a pathway to U.S. citizenship. Unlike the EB-5 program, the gold card initiative eliminates the job creation requirement, focusing instead on attracting affluent individuals to boost economic growth and reduce the national debt. So again....I will restate mt original point.....in the hopes that your reading comprehension is up to the task.... They did have a similar policy/plan in place. This is not something Trump created, he just took when they put in place and is trying to make it a revenue generator.

Perhaps you and I agree here, that opposing simply to oppose is not serving the american people, and is potentially waste/fraud/abuse.....regardless as to who is doing it.

They did not. They did have a similar policy/plan in place. This is not something Trump created, he just took when they put in place and is trying to make it a revenue generator. I like the idea in principle, but I am apprehensive about the government handling this.....the government suck at pretty much everything it does.... so I am going to wait and see just what happens here.

I hope on this point you are incorrect.....and politicians are not behaving like middle school kids at the lunch table, but are actually standing firm on their values..... I cannot discount what you are posting here, but I really hope they are better than this. I think this is all a missed opportunity. If they really want to position for something positive in the mid terms, which is what they should be doing, they should instead collaborate with Trump on the areas where they at least partially agree. Right now this scorched earth thing they have going on is not a winning strategy. JMHO

If a tree falls in the woods....and no one is there to hear it.....

I think there is merit to this assertion. And to be fair we have observed Republicans migrate over toward the Democrat side of thinking, and vice versa. So there is perhaps an ongoing realignment with people relocating to teams where they better fit. That being said, with Trump we have him regurgitating Democrat ideas from the past, but now these people pretend those ideas are somehow bad.....is it because Trump is saying them?

I do not share your optimism. Henyard is a bad.....bad......person. She has bought alot of votes by stealing from her locality. Like Voldemort from Harry Potter....there are ways she can return.....

I think anyone can fall victim to just beleiving what they read or hear....whether it comes from social media, politicians or perhaps legacy media. All of these sources espouse lies.

She IS a disgusting racist, I have to emphasize this point. We must call out racist speech, regardless of who does it. Let her be her....but counter her racist speech with better speech, and while it may take time, as we can see here eventually good wins out. It is likely true that our definition may differ. I do not accept that its about power, no....its about what you think and believe with the postulation that you will act on your vile beliefs.... its has nothing to do with power, that is slavery you might be thinking of.

Thank you for agreeing with me on the ratings, which were not great prior to the election, but absolutely tanked after. It appears, to my eyes, that the network is hoping to be purchased and is making moves to not get lowballed. Joy Reid is a disgusting racist. Note that I do not suggest she should be silenced, no, I think best response to repugnant speech such as she espoused is to let it show in the light of day.....and her removal is confirmation that evil does not win in the end.

I have no issue with Comey being held accountable, i they can prove what clearly did. The problem might be proving it. One would think that the whistleblowers would be enough, but they only matter when its a conservative being accused....it would seem. We can infer that any evidence will be portrayed as false or wrong or misinformation.....by liberals.....if that does happen, then I see that response as confirmation they were complicit. Though, it could also be true that they just mischaracterize it to feed their overall defensive scheme to protect the rest of their corruption.

I have some reservations about this. My experience with the government is that they can always fock up the easiest thing. So I will wait to see what happens here..... That being said, I infer there will be some automatic opposition to this from Democrats, who would oppose the cure for cancer if Trump found it...... so I actually am eager to hear what they try to do here. Its usually pretty entertaining.

So the question then arises. Should the network then lose money on a program that no one wants to watch? Of course not. I am certain they met with her and asked her to stop being a repugnant racist on her show and she refused, so they let her go.

My opinion.......this money went to a fake entity that simply funneled that money back to some Democrat somewhere.....which helps explain how they become multi-millionaires on a basic government salary.

Essentially.....something bad happens to anyone else? Thats on them.....something bad happens to an AA?......waaaaYYYYYYYCCCiiiiissmmmmmm

I think medical professionals across the board were working for people. It is clear now that those advocating against it were correct. If we can agree that its "their body their choice" then yeah, by all means let them make their own medical decisions.

I find your response to be suitable to this topic. I do not discount your assertion about it never helping, in fact, I concur. My issue is more along the lines of the allowance for government agencies like the FDA (who settled the lawsuit over it) And then also legacy media to misinform about this situation just as much as those promoted it. I guess, maybe my position is for those who decried ivermectin.....cry me a river.

I do hope that media who breathlessly lied about these medicines are self-reflective of their behaviors.......but I understand they see no reason to apologize for misinforming people

Somehwere, right now, liberals are holding a protest to get these criminals back out there to rape more women.