RLLD

Yeah, you saying that is pretty focking ironic....as if no one already knows and see you for what you are

On the one hand she has been pretty bad at her job, the variance in terms of later corrections is pretty substantial. But then again the process by which they conduct this analysis is just not well done, so it should not be surprising their numbers are completely unreliable. Though.....again...the magnitude of error borders on insane.....

These morons will gut every major metropolitan area if they can.....

Well, if you are not hard left you should expect the move to be portrayed in this manner.....its about crushing opposition by any means necessary.... of course.

I am not impressed with Democrats only caring about gerrymandering when it does not suit their pursuit of power. Pretending they suddenly care today does not really mean much, they were fine when their party was doing it.

While adding nothing at all to the discussion.....

It adds up that you cannot comprehend what it all means, you all couldn't do it last year either. You are consistently ignorant, which is fine by me...as long as your ideological masters lie and people like you parrot it....the Democrats lose voters, and if we can sustain that, we can be protected from your ignorance.

If the investigation is over, then I happily admit I am wrong, while I maintain that I am convinced that piece of sh!t is guilty and sold us out for all that money.....

I think you missed the point though. What does any of it matter to the average American. This is important because this is the element you and yours missed last year....

I will at least note that you remain consistent in believing these numbers when they first come out, like a good lemming you follow as you are told. I will also remain intellectually consistent in asserting once again, do not trust the initial numbers on the jobs report, it always gets revised later....and often in the past it was revised downward. So lets just wait, shall we? Well, YOU can ingest what the government says as gospel....at least when it serves your ideological bias....that is...

Because CNN did say.....and WSJ corroborated

I think you are correct that it probably wont stop their abuses. But why oppose it? Just because they want it stronger? Or because they are afraid of it?

If the investigation does not find definitive proof then I am wrong, and happily will be as I continue to believe that he is absolutely guilty of financial crimes. and absolutely sold us out to our adversaries. If I find 30 former intelligence officers willing to support my stance, would you then believe it? Just curious.

I explained it clearly, for anyone reading this now, please refer to this post to see how this piece of sh!t liar is behaving more clearly. Now, all I did was ask for the same, but you cant do it, because you dont understand it. You only regurgitate headlines. It is "focking awesome" now because its a solidly founded approach to the economy. Liberals are terrible, such as yourself, they lie and pretend to care or know...but they actually only harm. now you can go fock yourself.

@Fnord Care to answer me?

Again, I was rebutting the climate change lie about the impacts of humans, and then all the sudden you shifted to pollution. I caught you..... You are behaving as badly as that other specimen, the general or what ever. I try to have an honest dialectic and you twist it all around when it starts to not go your way....I am starting to think now that you also are unworthy of actual discussion.

Explain? To you? After this little display in this thread? I think not......you had a chance, now you can go fock yourself.

I say Biden is still guilty, a question i have answered for you many times, yet you still ask as if this is new. He is guilty. Why you would protect him now is baffling. Oh yeah, given the evidence I think Biden is guilty, thats pretty easy.  Now, that they choose to not hold him to account is on them. Perfect.  They have evidence here as well, just as they do with Biden.  Now, until that evidence proves him guilty we can assume he is based on that evidence, and later if convicted we know he is guilty.  We would have to wait for the outcome of the trial before our beliefs on his guilt can be confirmed.  We have to suspect guilt in order to investigate or charge or prosecute, you start from the suspicion but we wait for the court. YOU can ignore the banking statements evidence, the whistleblowers and the laptop contents if you choose.  I say prosecute him based on that evidence right now, but I am not making that decision.  If there is evidence that this kid did something, as there is with the Biden crime family, then by all means arrest and prosecute.   Its odd that you do not understand this. I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter.  Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money. 5) I remain confident based on the whistleblowers, IRS documents, bank records, laptop contents and investigation overall that Biden was absolutely selling influence to benefit financially. If you think that is not "corruption" that is fine for you, I assume Trump is now free to replicate everything documented that Biden did, right? here is just as much evidence about Biden as Adams.  You want Adams? Take him, by all means. I could give a fock about a politician ( I dont use corrupt here because it is redundant).   Take him out alllll  you want.  But also know this. I saw you and yours defend Biden where there is equitable evidence, and now you suddenly want to take someone out? I see you all for what you are. I mean, sure they have the details on the LLC's associated with the Biden family members, and maybe they could get them on tax evasion or something, but meh...... A few weeks before the 2020 presidential election, the New York Post published an article claiming they had obtained a copy of the laptop’s data. According to them, it contained evidence of Joe Biden engaging in corrupt activities related to foreign policy decisions benefiting Hunter and the companies he worked with. he entire purpose of the investigation is to find that mistake they made as part of their criminal enterprise. The entire reason for the setup with the fake LLC's is to hide the crime.....these people are not just going to admit it.....hand over the fact of what they did.....  Grassley is only alluding to what I have already said.....we do not yet have proof of what Biden did for the money.... No they didnt, they focused on the imporant element which was to try to determine what was sold to our adversaries by Biden for them to provide those millions to his family through the fake LLC's.   he effectively protected all that money, and his accomplices in his family,  through the pardons.

There is more to it than that, and since you do not understand what it really means it further highlights that you are only pointing at it because you find it useful. You dont actually care at all, or you would have the energy to explain why, but you either cant or wont. Regardless, it shows your pathetic way of thinking and behaving, done with you....

So here is where we now find ourselves.... You asked, and against my better judgement I answered. I asked and you either have no idea how to answer or flatly refuse to answer. Hence my issue with even speaking with you. You have no actual interest in the subject matter, i dialectic, in getting to the heart of the issue. So the next time you ask for something from me, rest assured, I will not provide it.

Explain, as I did, and provide details and context as to why GDP growth matters to the average american.....I mean....you are clearly invested in this point, its important to you.....so show me your depth of understanding as to WHY IT MATTERS TO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN Since this topic is so very important to you, you must surely understand why it is so important....right?

So, I answer your question with detail and thoroughness, and the most you can muster in return is "because its just good"? Can you understand now, why I do not see you as an honest participant in a conversation?

This is a lie, I was speaking toward climate change and you threw the gun and decided to switch it up to "pollution"...... and you got caught.....

I answered your question, now answer mine please. Please explain how and why that GDP growth matters to the average American, look, I answered you.....maybe you can answer me....

And how does that matter? How does it impact the average American? Keep in mind, I just put in effort to respond to you forthrightly and clearly.........