RLLD

I mean, yeah, in this regard he would be your average politician. Not that it matters. We should expect this from any and all of them. Outcomes are what matter.

I dont think anyone is at all surprised that a Democrat rep would say this, at this stage they are far more aligned with criminals than with most Americans.

To be fair, I do not think it actually is. I think radicals who are intent on the destruction of our nation are able to find a home in the Democrat party and then effectively leverage the "D" as their useful idiots to further their desire to destroy this culture and nation. These people are not actually "Democrats" at all. They are Marxist/Socialist terrorists that the Democrats simply accept.

I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter. Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money.

I accept that he paid a pro star to hide his infidelity, and I could not care less. It is that you pretend this is important that your party has useless leadership

Pretty happy across the board. Still a little peeved that there was not more cost cutting in that budget, but I also understand there is not a silver bullet for our problems.

Your attempts to wipe away the crimes of your masters wont work, not any more. We wont accept the "what difference does it make now anyway" defense of your criminal cult leaders.

And this is a fair summary of liberal tactics. Lie ,deceive, pursue criminal activities......and then later when caught.....call it old news. Its been an effective way for liberals to be ruthlessly corrupt for a long time. I hope we dont let it go now though. Lets drum up all the now "old" malfeasance....dont let them use this tactic any further.

I think she would not merely have continued the failed policies of the Biden admin, she would have doubled down. Is there any notion that she would have stemmed the tide of illegal immigration? Of course not. Any notion she would remove criminals? Of course not. She would have been weak, and continues policies that only harm us.

I think his estimation of her is spot on. She lacked anything required for POTUS and we should all be grateful, we dodged a major bullet in not electing her.

I hope we are able to avoid placing people in power who support mass migration to this nation and then also oppose mass deportation. While the USA is not perfect, we cannot sustain such poisonous policies.

Sure, but next week some random judge in Springfield OK will swoop in and decide the nations foreign policy for everyone by trying to block something else.

To be fair, she might actually be a Democrat, not the radical version that seems to dominate that party now, but the traditional sane Democrat of years gone by

I recall that Republicans also called out Obama for doing this, of course they were not so insipid as to suggest impeachment, but I am pretty sure they were all lathered up about him doing it without their approval....which of course he did not need....so its just politicians politicking...

What you said to avoid answering in a way that would admit that at that point the president was doing what you wanted is not relevant. I knew you would refuse to post that you saw the move as something you supported, that is what I posed the question over and over. I knew your position was only oppose, no matter what, even if he does something you approve of. And you fed right into that.

Perhaps you are correct on both counts.

Thanks, I had him high on my list of remaining, good to know others were sorta on the same thought line with him

Had my heart set on Higgins, once he got sniped I really didn't know what else I wanted, Bateman seems like a reasonable grab this late.

16.01 - DEF Green Bay Packers

15:12 - WR Rashad Bateman, BAL

To be fair, I had to move quick before he switched it up. I saw what the WH posted, seized on the opportunity to get it in before they started throwing in with the IDF..... Once they decided to get involved obviously I was opposed to that, but you cant blame me for wanting to use an opportunity to show hypocrisy where I saw it lived.... Setting all that aside, Israel should handle this sh!t on their own, or with the collaboration of the others in the arena.....WE should stay out of it So I find myself in a place liberals never venture.....disagreement with my political preference.

You are a liar, I put you in a position to simply say " Sure, if Trump is willing to stay out of it then I agree with him". That is all you had to do, so simple, I asked you repeatedly and you avoided it. This shows that no matter what he does or says, even if it meets your desires, you only oppose, no matter what. This was my goal, and why I kept asking you instead of defending Trump. You were either too blinded with hate or too stupid to do the simple thing

Didn't you wonder for even a moment why I kept asking if you would be in agreement with Trump if he supported your position instead of defending Trump? I mean you should have picked up on that as a hint. But from your response here, you did not, and I am a little surprised. You got caught, trying to spin what I did not wont work little guy

Ok, then yours...

as proven wrong within a couple of hours, per usual In fact I knew @Sean Mooney would never allow himself to assert that Trump had done something he agreed with, I saw him post his position, knew that at that time the WH had put out statements that showed concurrence and sought to expose the coward for what he is....and I did just that. Luckily, before the admin shifted gears, which of course they would. Oh, and before you tell another lie..... I do not agree with the WH position to get involved...so make up something else