RLLD

1) "Trump didnt do it, it was all the work Biden did......" 2) "Trump helped his buddy Putin get too much from the deal......" Thats all I can come up with right now, there could be something more, but these two are pretty standard for liberals....

I think yes. I look at his first term and the corrupt shenanigans of the Democrats and then I look at the damage they have done....... 8 years would really help unfock what they did.

That ###### racist will surely find a home with some extremist group.... Scarborough, on the other hand has done a 180 and suddenly stopped his vitriol entirely I think the dude is positioning to keep his job.

I think this is a sensible move, but when that group is repopulated it needs to comprise a range of viewpoints. The problem with this will be the absolute intolerance of liberals, and likely their refusal to share the same space at all with those who have opposing viewpoints.

I am gratified to see this sudden awareness for the plight of people, and I welcome our liberal friends to the party. I am a little apprehensive about this close alignment of Musk and Trump, but am willing to give it some time to see how it might unfold. We cannot overlook how the shedding of jobs will hurt people. There is a path, through tariffs, to offset losses in one market and deliver jobs in other markets. The goal to reduce government is a proper one, a useful one but if not properly conducted a rather harmful one. Now, there are simple things to chop off, ANYTHING associated with DEI must go immediately and then target the overlaps, and man......there are alot of overlaps.....wring those out for sure. Much of "government" is contracting, so those contracts are perhaps likely to grow and with that the migration of government people toward contract agencies, which already happens.

I have worked with FEMA, its a rather poorly run org, but not the worst. If I were to bet, they are going to spin this action into some kind of safety protocol to get out of accountability

Thats fine, I disagree, and I want an investigation to ensure that is correct.

I disagree, he is doing good work.

He can buy it, and hand it off.....stay out of it except to insist that it not favor a political party..... Moreover, if he is involved with this governmental efficiency agency, he has to be disconnected.

I think folks who want this to just go away are back to the " so what it happened once" defense, until of course someone does a one off that feeds some other thing they want to champion.....then.....oh boy.....THEN......that one off is a problem....

Being a Democrat is such a perilous decision, eventually they will come for you.....look at them all now today stating the things they were calling those on the right evil for saying....

He should be able to acquire MSDNC on the low people are leaving the outlet in droves now/ This time they did more than simply lie, they spent the ensuing days after the election calling everyone racist and other stuff......lashing out like the children they are. I hope he buys it and turns it into a legitimate news outlet.

Of course I didn't believe those people, are you kidding? They were brought in and they wanted the notoriety. Now, whether this woman is telling the truth or not I presume we will do as was done with those two, and investigate. Then later, we can know whether or not we should believe them. For now, I will assume you also did not believe those others and their accusations as I did not believe them.

Are we allowed to simply assert that anyone opposing Noem is.......misogynist? Or are we today allowed to really discuss qualifications for a woman without being called some name?

I long for the heady days when we simply believed people like oh say....Stormy Daniels......or Christine Blasey Ford....... man those were good times....... I guess we are back to not believing people now?

My main concern will be the level of corruption i the DOJ and how he positions to at first defend himself from it, and then tackles getting rid of the partisan political players. Sure he can clean it out, but every move he makes will be maligned with lies by leftists in government and the media. Though, thankfully it would appear that people have had their fill of lying media and are finally moving away in droves. Now, I am also concerned with a pendulum swing with him perhaps replacing leftists with right wing numbnuts......so I want people WITHOUT political allegiance being applied to their work.

OMFG.......please....please....please... DO THIS SH!T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He simply must start with the DOJ.....the Democrats have demonstrated they are willing to abuse the legal system without restraint. We know that across the nation there are those within the legal community are only too willing to pervert the rule of law to pursue a political outcome. That cvnnt in NY has already announced she plans to continue. He has got to get people in there to clean that cesspool out, day 1. That must be the priority.

Not all agencies are created equal, each one faces some variation of dysfunction. By way of example, DOT is likely one of THE WORST run organizations I have seen in government. Everything about that agency is just bad....... gutting it would be the only way. Conversely, NIH is better run, but as a financial problem.....that focking place is like the mafia.....and the egoes and fighting ....oh my god.....but you really cant get rid of the leadership without severely degrading its ability to serve....its a BIG problem

While I do like the premise of this effort, they really have no idea what they are up against here. You would need to remove 75% of agency leadership to make an impact. These people are so entrenched with making themselves important that they will fight ANY effort to improve. I deal with these folks every focking day, they are miserable.....

anything that might tend to denigrate the Democrat party = "misinformation" If you can wrap your mind around that then you understand liberals

This is not the hill to die on. Defending this will not impact your political favorites, they are insulated from this. Even the upper reaches of FEMA will be insulated from this. What you have here is an example of the bureaucracy being polluted with hate for people of a specific persuasion, in this case for Trump. In the coming years, should this behavior be replicated toward Democrat voters you will be justifiably incensed.....come find me then, we can be arm in arm, if only because temporarily your morality aligns with mine

I have a different perspective. She was instructed to not support Trump people, she also knew others were instructed to do the same. They are letting her take the fall, but she is not going to let them get away with it. They going to let her get screwed? She will take them all down

I doubt she can save herself by outing others doing the same thing. She would have been better off cutting a deal than just speaking out lets see how this strategy unfolds and here I thought she was just making sure that if SHE is being held accountable that others were as well….huh….

Interesting take. So your thinking that she wants to just take others down with her then?