RLLD

On her phone, so that is where they remain, for now. BUT.....I am confident that there will be an investigation, and given the level of corruption in other agencies, well, the chances this is not something bigger are not good.

I think your question would be better directed to the woman in question, she has them on her phone, showed them in another video....but then again the issue is not whether or not it happened or she did it, the issue is whether or not she is telling the truth about the agency doctrine or the agency is telling the truth. I owe you nothing. Not that you would accept evidence such as a document anyway, so that is really a pointless venture. SO.....as I have stated, I do not believe anything government says, so I am already on her side......now, back to the video, its a rather dangerous move if she is indeed lying,,,

I am under no obligation to do that. Moreover, usually people pretend I "word salad" because I try to anticipate every little complaint that could possible arise. So, make up your minds.....

I did not promise you any documents and therefore am not accountable to bring any. I did however just post a video where the words of this person can be heard directly......along with my text admission that she could still be lying, and how dangerous that might be,,,,

Well, no......since the number is much smaller, I think it less important....and I find it strange that I have to explain that.....

I guess she could still be making it all up. Dangerous game to play, going onto national media like this and calling out the entire agency.

I felt as though it might be useful to all out how an adult handles a misunderstanding.....you can simply look above, or use this link

Ahhh, I must have misread that.

She should just identify as the winner of the election. You can be anything you want if you just speak it out loud, and dress up as what ever it is you want to be......

Wray has to go day 1, hands down....

Well, I guess if you are certain she is making this up, texted herself and is lying about it all, then you wont accept the premise that this has transpired elsewhere as part of an agency doctrine. I want to have proof of this at this stage, I am unwilling to trust the government.

Well, no, I am doing it to you as well.....but you are a little quicker to pick up what you are missing than he is.

No sir, he has to learn. The distinction between knowledge and wisdom needs to be closed. He exemplifies the problem with our educational system, they are taught what to think instead of how to think. If I an help him bridge that gap I will do it. Requires patience.....

He has to make the final argument! I am not going to do that for him, its a process....... Let him meander through these thoughts, I am slowly directing him through the denouement now.

OK, so we are going to repeat the prior steps again, and then maybe you will stumble over the actual argument you should be making.... Correct.....  Oh ,you have bank records and text messages and other evidence for Gaetz?  Well, please do share.....

Oh, so you have this situation all figured out then. OK. I leave you to proceed with your premise. I think I am going to wait a bit longer though, in case there is more to this story.....

OK, I expected you to try something else but maybe you wanted to throw this in again as you did here..... so then you get the same response when you used this attempt......I have no idea whether or not he is innocent, what an odd assertion to make....

The documents she referenced were highlighted and corroborate this. This should bother you.......

Unproven claims are no loner sufficient to declare truth? Man, this election was awesome, I am loving this new world.....

Well yes, but there is no need to pander to the racist and sexist people who DO look at these situations in that way. The active avoidance of not pandering to racists and sexists is a very good thing. Just enjoying that for a minute.

Why might you disagree? Is there some data point that you are working from? I ask honestly, because when it comes to government.......you should not anticipate "good" behaviors as a rule, quite the opposite....

Alex Jones absolutely needs to go away, he is just a POS

Again, if the records exist then you have every right to believe what the evidence suggests, right? Can this at least be true for this specific instance? For you.....? Does the participant makeup allow you to show an ounce of morality.....today? I mean you can go back to what you believed yesterday about such things.....where the politics dont work for you....later of course...

Not yet, and later when I spring the final trap on him he will do the MDC dance to backtrack out of it, pretending the opposite happened, but hang around, he has at least two more points to make, before I make that final swing.

There is something more important at play here. With his posting in this thread, he is demonstrating he has the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, meaning his defense of Biden is something he does purely for political reasons.