-
Content Count
4,528 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Everything posted by Law
-
If I could be sure Kupp would be back W5 I would have given it more thought but I'm not so I couldn't pull that trigger. In the end, I tried to get Pittman or Addison for Tannehill but settled for London. I don't think Tannehill starts all year and London actually caught passes last year so I think he will again. So I traded 1 of 5 QBs and still have decent backup (for a 2 QB league) and added a WR projected before W1 to be a top 30 guy this year.
-
In a 2-QB where QBs have a high priority due to scarcity and the points they score, the Rodgers owner offered me Kupp for Geno Smith! Right now he has Allen and Ridder and nothing else. And there's no QBs who play available. But if I trade Geno, I'll have to start Tannehill or Z Wilson as my #2 QB. Would you risk it?
-
A and B are the only answers. And E!
-
Note to Jets: You might want to consider covering Diggs. Buffalo is a one man offense!
-
Well, I have them on 2 teams and chose to play Wash instead.
-
Akers in the doghouse again?
-
WOW! Either you're very old or culturally aware. Kudos.
-
One league, I have Kupp and Watson. Yep. That's a solid start!
-
I played D Monty over Pacheco. That KC actually threw to Pacheco was something knew but they couldn't run for crap. Monty didn't bust anything off, but 21 carries will do! Surprised the Lions didn't throw much to the backs - Monty or Gibbs. But hey, they won.
-
Two straight DNPs is a real problem. I was strong on him this draft season as he's in 3 of 5 leagues. I will have to go with N Collins in one league; Dotson in another (not bad at all); and JuJu in the third (that's bad).
-
Yeah. I'm not sure why you felt the need to reply like that, but hey! You be you. I don't need for either you (Mr. Jefferson) or Mims. I merely provided my input to a question.
-
I think Mims would be an equal or better option than Van Jeff.
-
Thanks for your usual keen insight. You're a gift to the forearm!
-
I do 5 leagues. With respect to Kickers, I wait till near the end and target a K with a later bye. I just wanna set it and forget it as long as possible. When the bye comes, I usually drop them for some other K who already had their bye and is available. Anyway, I didn't plan this this year and I never did it before, but I kind of like it. No more facing my own K or anything. I have just one guy to even think about. I drafted Harrison Butker in my first draft. Top offense with a week 10 bye. That I have him as a top 5 guy, even better. Drafted him in the 2nd and 3rd and then by 4th I figured why not. In the 5th, I said I'm taking him for sure. So I have him in all 5 leagues. Have you ever done this? He's a K so not much risk for injury. He's consistent, on a top offense, and can kick long FGs too. I've convinced myself this is good.
-
Careful. If you says his name 3x, he pops up and never goes away. Kinda like herpes.
-
I can only keep one if a PPR league. Barkley has proven it and is the total focal point of his offense, but he has an injury history. Pollard was gold in a more limited role. Can he hold up to more work? Thoughts?
-
Ezekiel Elliott Expected to Sign with New England
Law replied to Mike FF Today's topic in FFToday Board
If you need a yard, Zeke's your guy! I think he had 20 attempts last year where the team needed a yard. He got it 19x! But that's about it. He has little left. He might just be the oldest 28 year old ever! I'd put the number at 5-8 TDs on the year. All at 2 yards of less. I'd be surprised if he passes 300 rush yards. Stevenson will still be THE guy. But instead of the 2nd round, he's maybe a third now. Still a great #2 RB, just might not be the 1 we might have hoped for. -
fixed it for you