BudBro

Saw this earlier. Ann Coulter: How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

The pivotal randomized clinical trials with the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine included North American and British populations [24, 25]. Two cases of myocarditis were identified in 30,058 vaccinated individuals and one case among 19,982 who received placebo [26], which would account for a non-statistically significant increase of myocarditis risk (relative risk 1.33, 95% CI 0.12–14.66). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9928497/ I agree, however, that the inflammation of the heart seems consistent with all the jabs (and, apparently, even with placebo jabs). "To understand this, let's take a look at how an mRNA vaccination works. An mRNA vaccine, like the ones Pfizer or Moderna use, work by using messenger RNA (which carries information from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus) that is created in a lab to teach the body how to create an immune response, according to the CDC. Novavax, on the other hand, is protein-based, which means no mRNA is required. In order to create the vaccine, scientists used the spike protein from the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. This spike protein is what allows the coronavirus to latch onto and enter human cells. Once created, researchers take this modified spike protein gene and insert it into a baculovirus (a.k.a. an insect virus), the FDA notes. That virus is then used to infect insect cells. From there, new spike proteins grow, which are harvested and used to mimic SARS-CoV-2. This sets off an immune response, which prevents the vaccine from actually making you sick. After you are vaccinated, your body will perceive the altered proteins as a threat and produce antibodies that will jump into action, if you contract COVID in the future. One benefit of the Novavax vaccine is that it contains adjuvant, which is used in certain vaccines to create a stronger immune response, according to the CDC." link

Watched the new Top Gun movie last weekend. Jennifer Connelly looked fantastic.

Novavax finally making a run, after being shunned in the US market in favor of the mRna companies. Novavax utilizes proteins in the more familiar way vaccines have been made in the past. No mRna genetic bioweapons. rink

Most "evangelicals" only know dispensationalism. If you told them the 70th week followed the 69th and isn't in their future, they'd call you the devil.

My condolences to you and your family. Cool opportunity to meet players, but maybe there will be others.

I feel like the opportunity is to hang out with the Chiefs. FJB won't know any of them are even there...nor will he care.

chuckled a little.

You'll remember the left's pursuit of the Scotus judges after the ruling to let states decide abortion. Maybe the incident with Rand Paul and his family, too. Or, when a Trump hater shot 5 legislators at a baseball field. Of course, you do. Just play acting for the bored.

Actively re-seeking the office of POTUS after being found mentally incompetent to stand trial for what amounts to be treason. If he were to magically get re-elected, like he did the first time, we deserve what we get. Regardless of one's disdain for Pres Trump, nobody of sound mind can actively support Biden. Scotus ruled against Nixon's assertion of executive privilege.

The distraction by the dem karens left the question unanswered. Great tactic by them. The entire group is treasonous. Tall trees and short ropes.

I posted an article within that last couple pages showing you how it affects sars-cov-2, along with every other RNA virus, and a host of other illnesses. At the time it was discovered that it did have positive effect on sars-cov-2, a disinfo campaign was necessarily launched to allow for financially failing big pharma companies to introduce their mRna drugs. In order to receive their emergency authorization, the language stated there couldn't be any other helpful drug available. As such, ivm got smeared. That has since been "officially" undone (though there are proxies like you still at it), but too late for those who were poisoned by gene mutation therapies as a requirement to maintain their employment or stay in school. The reason the horse paste gained any traction at all was because it was the only means of acquiring ivm. No doctors would prescribe it. And if they did, no pharmacies would fill.

This thread quickly became about people who subscribe to a particular sexual fetish. Though they represent the needle in the haystack, one wouldn't know it by all the ruckus that's been created around them. Your reply earlier in this thread is how new rights are being carved out, and govt is doing it through companies like yours. In the dei world of Fink and Biden and Obama, you've got no chance in addressing the issue corporately, nor do you personally as an employee. Just like the migrant scheme being run through the catholic charities (ngo's), so too the govt runs this scheme through corporations. They did it the same way with covid. They are all proxy wars, exactly the same way we are fighting Russia, but in Ukraine instead of here or there.

Yeesh, bro. How long to beat the dead horse? The ivm in one is the same ivm as the other. It's a fantastic, life-changing drug. Why the hate for good things?

Yes. Here's what you said... "The main issue with people taking veterinary ivermectin was that it was easier for them to screw up the dosage, and that is what caused risk from ivermectin. " I didn't read that post, so I do apologize. I read the post where you attempted to imply there was a distinction between the ivm found in the "human" form you mentioned vs the "animal" form. There isn't.

I said dem tards. S**t must not be bad enough yet for the dems to finally figure out keynes was cosmically wrong. But, misery is starting to affect their bank accounts, too. I appreciate the glimpse you gave.

Conservatives pushed for the civil rights act in the 1950s. Time to study some history. Dems ran the longest filibuster in history against the civil rights act. Dem leaders against included William Fulbright (Clinton mentor), Al Gore Sr. (vp and internet inventor's dad), and Robert Byrd (kkk member). LBJ, as leader of the senate, voted against it before agreeing to it in 1964 to get blacks to vote democrat.

Good to hear. I lurk. Too many dem tards (or just one with 30 names) with nothing to say. Moral relativism on the geek bored, eh? lol.

'sup jk? Hope you're doing well.

Ok. I won't put words in your mouth, but will suggest that common sense and cultural norms can be seen in two radically opposed political parties. You expressed opposition for the trans in your wife's locker room, yet you seem to support the political party which encourages the degeneration of moral norms that end up with d*&ks out in the locker room. That, seemingly, is a conflict...or hypocrisy (or, just play acting on the bored so you can f**k with people). Either way, the argument seems to dissipate into which political party best keeps the slope the most dry.

A significant impact on women's rights in the muslim world has come from Christianity.

I heard you. You followed up with: "And how slippery can the slope be when there are so very few trannies?" I posed it as a way to move beyond the single issue. How do you propose we move it back toward what was originally intended by the framers? And, who, do you propose, is going to make that happen (if, indeed, that is something you even espouse)?

Think bigger than the one issue. Back to the op, then, who is to decide what is good and what is evil (moral relativism)? You seem fine with wives and daughters having a grown man play with his d*&k in the women's gym locker room or school locker room. At what point is there a line to be drawn, and who should draw it, in your opinion? Does it need to be your daughter in order to affect your "live and let live" philosophy of life? Does it need to progress to being raped or killed to get to the line in the sand? If it's someone else's concern only, should it be left alone? To the extreme, would you just sit back and allow another Jewish holocaust because it's in another country and a different culture?

It's the "slippery slope" that is the threat, and which makes each move of the boundary line existential. Carving out more and more rights for tiny minority populations is divergent from the framing of the country.

Trans is sexual fetish. Though I don't know yours, nor you know mine, it's important that neither us have the "right" to impose it on a societal scale.