CrazyStanley

In a redraft league with 1PPR which would you rather have from here on out. Both off to weak starts.

Wash vs NYG Def this week. how will Portis do? or the whole wash O? Will it be 31-6 with 2 wash FG or will it be closer? thinking about benching him in 1 for F Jones, V Jackson or Ocho Cinco and in another for R Brown. What do people expect from the Skins this week vs a dominant D?

This is a great question. I like both alot. It comes down to their schedules for me, since i think they will both have a really nice year. GB plays Det twice, Chicago's weak pass D twice, the Browns, Bengals and Rams each once, sounds like the winner to me. Good luck, i would go with Jennings by a slim margin.

I would go with Brown..basically because i would rather go with what i know than what i dont know. I know Brown will get most of the carries on a run oriented team. i know Brown will be running some wildcat which puts the ball in his hands more. I know he is now 2 season removed from knee surgury where they are back to 100%. I know he has serious skill. I dont know what the raiders offense will be this year. i dont know who their QB will be. I dont know how many carries Bush and Fargas will steal from McFadden. I know he has had some injury concerns. I do know he has serious skills and i loved him coming out of college...i know i didnt want anything to do with him when he went to the Raiders. so just my opinion, and that is if i know all i think i know good luck, but i like Brown better.

We have a 3 round Dynasty Rookie only draft coming up and i am wondering where people are going. I am assuming that since RBs are usually the most important, it will start something like this: 1- Moreno 2- Wells/Brown/McCoy 3- Wells/Brown/McCoy 4- Wells/Brown/McCoy 5- S Green 6- ???? 7- ? 8- ? 9- ? 10- ? Here is where it gets interesting. What happens now? Are there other RBs to consider or does the run on WR start and if so what order? I assume Harvin, Crabtree, Maclin, HaywardBay.... in some order...is it QB time which i would doubt. What are most top 10s looking like? Top 20s? Any help would be great.

I have done a 2 Q league a couple times now and like the changes in brings. The draft changes totally. We had 3 Qbs go in round 1 and 3 or 4 more go in round 2. In your case, i would do these things if you want the 2nd QB to actually change your league: keep scoring the same cap at 10 teams dont flex a qb spot, it devalues the change you are making stockpiling can be an issue, however, it makes you draft better. there are 32 starting qbs and usually 3 or 4 others that get significant playing time due to injuries or benchings. it is nice if i can leave the draft with 4 of the 36 or so potential QBs. i would change one of the WR spots to a RB flex spot, with the extra starting qb it makes you use an extra spot on your bench for an extra qb so that flexibiliy helps i really like this type of league, just something different and it totally changes the draft and usually forces more trading in season hope it works our for ya

Yeah, and i think 6 or 7 of their wins this season (including Alabama) came against teams that are in bowl games. This team REALLY may force college football into a playoff...finally. i say take the top 8 and do a little tournament. Sure you have to make a cutoff where 8 and 9 are but i would rather do it there than at number 3. Plus this way all 8 get a chance to win. Utah wouldnt have gotten left out. USC wouldnt have gotten left out. Texas wouldnt have gotten left out. They may not have won it all but would at least have had a shot. I have been preaching this for years now...

I see the QBs being the best part of this draft, depending who comes out, Stafford, Bradford, Herrel, Teebow, and even C Painter could do some damage. I feel like i am missing someone as well. White from WV could be a "wildcat type" that could throw better than putting R Brown or J Norwood back there and still run it well.

What I find odd about the matchups, in the 4 games where both teams are ranked (i dont recall Wisc and FSUs rank), the big ten team is the lower rank...so it seems to me that the teams "should" lose all 4 games...right? So if they would win one of the 4, then it would be better than expected. It seems as when the bowls were set up the big ten was sort of set up to come out without many wins. Wisconsin played a terrible game and FSUs agressive and quick Def took advantage. NWU played a good game and that one could have gone either way. Anyway, looking at rankings, the bigten shouldnt get many wins, they are the "worse" team in most of the matchups according to rankings... thoughts?

2 of my 3 teams were in the super bowl yesterday and both played against P Thomas and BOTH won, his 9 points were nothing special. He was outscored by my late FA addition F Jackson in my one game that i picked up off the FA wire since i didnt really want to play cotchery and Bush was on IR. In the other game he couldnt keep up with my MVP- DeAngelo Williams! 2 Super Bowl victories =

#1- This is the Pros, if you cant put a competitive team on the field, it is your own problem. Dont go home crying about how bad they beat you, do something about it. #2- They get paid alot of money and get incentives and so on based on their performance. You dont want to tell someone, sorry, we are going to run the ball because theyre bad and we dont want to hurt their feelings. #3- When looking at hall of fame credentials, they arent going to say, "well, he had a good year and career, and his team was nice to the lions that one year and didnt humiliate them just to beat the record, which he doesnt have, but lets let him in anyway... come on people, these are the pros. and by the way, DeAngelo Williams is REALLY GOOD!

I know i am late on this (just got to the board) but who would, in their right mind, bench Williams. I know he has 3 TDs and hind sight is 20/20 but looking at it before the game. Coming into the game, he was the #1 overall RB in my fantasy league. If you are in the SuperBowl, he is the main reason. Let me say that again, he is the BEST RB this year in fantasy. You dont bench him. I dont care who he is playing. He could be playing the 85 Bears Defense or the Steelers of this year or the Ravens of a couple years back... you play the best fantasy RB in the superbowl, stupid if you dont. In year past, would you bench LT2 in your super bowl? Faulk? Holmes? LJ? Come one people. In my leagues, had to start 3 out of Grant, Portis, D Williams, and Chris Johnson and D Williams was NOT an option to bench, Grant was the choice and it worked out perfectly. Benching the best Fantasy RB of the year in the Super Bowl, what kind of people are we dealing with here honestly?

I would say that sounds about right.

I HATE Cedric Benson(but love this quote), what a waste/idiot/moron so on and so forth

I know...i might be.....Im glad you got a chance to laugh but you didnt answer my question.