DJBRIANHARRIS

Antsports Mock Draft 79 (5 more teams needed), Im Broncos suck

Anyone know when ESPNS hits the stands?

get in this one...we need 4 more teams! AntSports Mock Draft 2832

Does anyone remember Kijana Carter

Here is my yahoo team....please compare...Please note: Yahoo leagues must have retards...thats the point I'm trying to make (Parenthesis notes pick #, 10 team league) (4) Tomlinson (17) L.Jordan (24) Fitzgerald (37) C. Palmer (44) P. Burress (57) T. Gonzalez (64) J. Horn (77) Balt-D (84) D. Akers-K (97) J. Addai (104) I. Bruce (117) D. Brees (124) E. Wilford (137) Phil-D (144) J. Reed -K What a joke....

1) T. Owens 2) S.Smith 3) T. Holt 4) C. Johnson 5) L. Fitzgerald 6.) M. Harrison 7.) R. Moss

I think the entire argument comes down to this question. Is it worth taking him as the #1 WR off the board? Therefore, I draw these facts to support..NO. 1. Moss hasnt had a stellar season since 03' 2. Is he on the decline of his career? Stats may indicate. 3. The nagging injuries have been driving us fantasy owners insane the last 2 seqasons. 4. Is Randy still Randy without Minnesota? Plays a lot more games per season on the grass and outdoors. 5. Is he happy in Oakloand? Does he FEEL like playing today? 6. Terrell Owens: Has been big EVERY year since 2000 Steve Smith: Career on incline? Stats indicate so. Torry Holt: One of the most consistent fantasy WR in the past 6 seasons. Stats & Health. These are just a few. In closing, I do feel that Randy can end up as the best WR of 06' but to take him off the board as the first WR chosen is too risky IMO.

Id bet that he will be the #1 WR chosen in about 1 of every 100 drafts.

Really? Its out? I read online the 20th (Source: https://r.espn.go.com/espn/purchase?product...ce=FFG06MagSpt) but thats great that its out early! Where did u get it? BTW to the person who asked about the age thing...yes it did have it in last years.

June 20th!

I never use the fantasy books for anything but entertainment. I have bought many over the years but last year I bought the ESPN mag and thought it was enjoyable. Most mags just seem toi nfluence you away from your original thinking and end up making you pissed half way through the season.

Not asking who I should start but if you guys had to decide between Daunte Culpepper (vs. GB) or Mark Brunell (vs. SF) this week, who would you choose?

How come there is no 2004 in the stat allocation area?