Jump to content

Belushi

Members
  • Content Count

    2,881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Belushi


  1. I dropped him in a 12 man and no one's picked up him. Concussions have ended his previous seasons, and this one sounds like it will keep him out a few games. And he hasn't produced even when healthy. I see no upside there, he's safe to drop.


  2. I hope he comes around. I've got H. Miller but I don't have enough room on my bench for 2 TE's, so I'm dropping Miller and relying on Cameron for the rest of the year.

     

    And yes, I've tried trading Miller to everyone I can think of and no takers. I hate dropping the #12 TE in my league, but with RB injuries I need the spot.


  3.  

    I realize he has value and was mostly being sarcastic, however, I disagree with McFadden over Hillman for now, let's see how Denver does in their next couple of games. If Denver can get a lead and get their run game going, whatever RB gets the bulk of those carries could be valuable.

     

    I could be wrong, but I'm really not getting the hype for Hillman. He's had plenty of opportunities and wasted them, despite being on a great offence. This isn't some rookie who's potential we don't know about. And he'll be splitting touches with one or two other RBs, and they are more likely to get the goal-line carries.

     

    I prefer McFadden to Hillman. MJD isn't getting many touches, and no one seems sold on Murray.


  4. "This should benefit Darren McFadden, who drew the start in Week 4. Maurice Jones-Drew has nothing left. McFadden got the start in Week 4 and out-snapped MJD 46-17."

     

    Rotoworld is so full of it. If MJD have nothing left, then McFadden is dead.

     

    Well, I've got Storm Johnson on my bench (mostly because I like his name). I was thinking McFadden may be better for that spot. If MJD isn't getting touches, McFadden is a 3 down back (on an awful team). If the Raiders start to go more run-heavy, maybe McFadden puts up enough points in a PPR league to be a flex play? I'm not dropping Lacy for him, but there's not allot of starting RBs getting 10-20 touches/game on waivers.


  5. Something tells me that if his name was Joe Smith he wouldn't be getting any attention at all. The team is terrible, constantly playing from behind, and they have one of the worst O-lines in the league. Add in the fact that they have a 3-way competition for carries in the backfield, I don't see how he's someone you really want to pick up unless you're in an 18 team league.

    • Like 1

  6. I think Oliver has the best chance for long-term value. He'll get a couple of starts, and if he can put up Woodhead numbers the rest of the season then he could be a good flex play.

     

    Hillman may get 2-3 starts, but the schedule isn't easy, and he's got potentially 2 other RBs to share with. He'll likely lose GL carries at least. And I think the job is Ball's when he gets back. Denver knows what they have in Hillman, and clearly they don't view him as a starter. I don't think Ball's problems have to do with talent - the O-line blocking just hasn't been there.

     

    I'd go Oliver-Williams-Hillman for waivers.

    • Like 1

  7. I've thought about dropping the Broncos D for the Packers. I'm sure Ponder won't have much success, but I'm not sure you'll see allot of sacks out of the Packers. Matthews is a little gimpy, and overall they don't have allot of sacks. You'd really be counting on the INT's.


  8. I'm looking to trade one of these WR's in a deal to get Julius Thomas. Other other owner has Bennett at TE and needs WRs.

     

    Who would you rather keep for the ROS? Floyd has Palmer coming back, and is a better bet for TDs. But this is a 0.5 PPR league, and Sanders is racking up the catches. Both are done their bye weeks now.


  9. I'd love to move him, but I doubt I could get much. He's on a bye this week. Maybe you can get an owner that doesn't know Moreno is coming back in week 6.

     

    Did anyone watch the game? Why did Miller only get 12 carries? Seems like he was producing, and with the lead I expected more carries.


  10. I wouldn't give up a starter like Patterson for a backup like Davis. It would drive me crazy not having him too, but I think its too much to give up. If Charles is healthy the rest of the year, you'll feel dumb for trading a starter for a guy sitting on your bench.

     

    If you have to trade, I'd give up West instead of Sankey. I think Sankey has a big 2nd half - Green has done nothing, and their passing game blows. They have a good O-line, and they should lean on the run. West will at best split carries with Tate and Crowell (sp?).

     

    That said, I'd rather have Mathews than Sankey. Mathews will be back in a few weeks and with Woodhead gone, he will see allot more snaps.

     

    Here's mine.

     

    http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=437607

×