Belushi

I benched Floyd this week, so he's guaranteed to have 100 yards and a TD. Start him!

I dropped him in a 12 man and no one's picked up him. Concussions have ended his previous seasons, and this one sounds like it will keep him out a few games. And he hasn't produced even when healthy. I see no upside there, he's safe to drop.

Saw this Rotoworld article about Sporano focusing more on the run, and McFadden being the lead back. He's on waivers in my league. Is he worth a stash as an RB3/4? http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4649/darren-mcfadden

I hope he comes around. I've got H. Miller but I don't have enough room on my bench for 2 TE's, so I'm dropping Miller and relying on Cameron for the rest of the year. And yes, I've tried trading Miller to everyone I can think of and no takers. I hate dropping the #12 TE in my league, but with RB injuries I need the spot.

Stacy is only ever good if he gets a high volume of carries. Given how bad the Rams have been and how effective Cuningham has been, I don't see Stacy getting the volume he needs to put up good numbers. He's not a special back, he's just a guy that can carry the ball 20 times a game.

I could be wrong, but I'm really not getting the hype for Hillman. He's had plenty of opportunities and wasted them, despite being on a great offence. This isn't some rookie who's potential we don't know about. And he'll be splitting touches with one or two other RBs, and they are more likely to get the goal-line carries. I prefer McFadden to Hillman. MJD isn't getting many touches, and no one seems sold on Murray.

Gerhart downgraded to DNP in practice. Get the Storm hype train rolling!

I picked him up. I had no one else named Storm on my team.

Well, I've got Storm Johnson on my bench (mostly because I like his name). I was thinking McFadden may be better for that spot. If MJD isn't getting touches, McFadden is a 3 down back (on an awful team). If the Raiders start to go more run-heavy, maybe McFadden puts up enough points in a PPR league to be a flex play? I'm not dropping Lacy for him, but there's not allot of starting RBs getting 10-20 touches/game on waivers.

Something tells me that if his name was Joe Smith he wouldn't be getting any attention at all. The team is terrible, constantly playing from behind, and they have one of the worst O-lines in the league. Add in the fact that they have a 3-way competition for carries in the backfield, I don't see how he's someone you really want to pick up unless you're in an 18 team league.

I offered him to the Gio owner for Ingram. But if he doesn't bite I have no problem holding onto him. Huge upside if Gio is hurt, and can still be used as a flex on weeks when the Bengals should dominate.

I'm going to give them one more chance this week against the Jets. It may be the best matchup right now for a D.

I think Oliver has the best chance for long-term value. He'll get a couple of starts, and if he can put up Woodhead numbers the rest of the season then he could be a good flex play. Hillman may get 2-3 starts, but the schedule isn't easy, and he's got potentially 2 other RBs to share with. He'll likely lose GL carries at least. And I think the job is Ball's when he gets back. Denver knows what they have in Hillman, and clearly they don't view him as a starter. I don't think Ball's problems have to do with talent - the O-line blocking just hasn't been there. I'd go Oliver-Williams-Hillman for waivers.

I traded for him 2 weeks ago. 3 TD's so far and he looked great last night. Now if Montee Ball turns things around I've got a very solid backfield.

I'm benching him for Michael Floyd. I need more than 2 pts. out of my WRs.

I think people counting on McKinnon will be disappointed. The Packers will likely get up by allot early, forcing Min to throw. McKinnon can't pass protect, so he won't be on the field much in the 2nd half. I wouldn't start McKinnon this week.

I've thought about dropping the Broncos D for the Packers. I'm sure Ponder won't have much success, but I'm not sure you'll see allot of sacks out of the Packers. Matthews is a little gimpy, and overall they don't have allot of sacks. You'd really be counting on the INT's.

I'm trying to trade for Moreno to pair with Miller. Makes a good flex play, back-up RB. I'm not going to get value for Miller, and Moreno's value may be low with his injury and the bye week.

I'm looking to trade one of these WR's in a deal to get Julius Thomas. Other other owner has Bennett at TE and needs WRs. Who would you rather keep for the ROS? Floyd has Palmer coming back, and is a better bet for TDs. But this is a 0.5 PPR league, and Sanders is racking up the catches. Both are done their bye weeks now.

Thanks!

Colts D for 12 points this week, after 17 points against the Jags last week. Now its time to drop your ass.

Its too bad about Allen. His GM set him up to fail. A team that needs rebuilding shouldn't be blowing all of its cash on over-the-hill veterans.

ASJ, the TE in Tampa, got allot of playtime this week. With Evans hurt, he may have a chance.

I'd love to move him, but I doubt I could get much. He's on a bye this week. Maybe you can get an owner that doesn't know Moreno is coming back in week 6. Did anyone watch the game? Why did Miller only get 12 carries? Seems like he was producing, and with the lead I expected more carries.

I wouldn't give up a starter like Patterson for a backup like Davis. It would drive me crazy not having him too, but I think its too much to give up. If Charles is healthy the rest of the year, you'll feel dumb for trading a starter for a guy sitting on your bench. If you have to trade, I'd give up West instead of Sankey. I think Sankey has a big 2nd half - Green has done nothing, and their passing game blows. They have a good O-line, and they should lean on the run. West will at best split carries with Tate and Crowell (sp?). That said, I'd rather have Mathews than Sankey. Mathews will be back in a few weeks and with Woodhead gone, he will see allot more snaps. Here's mine. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=437607