Strike

Actually he said both. Here is his first quote: And for the record, when I said it would still be illegal I was responding to your question about Trump only. And if he had Trump on in addition to Kamalatoe it would still be illegal because there are third party candidates. As far as the complicated thing goes, he went on to talk about how there are a bunch of third party candidates, some of whom are only on the ballot in a few states, etc......But really, I don't know why you get in to these semantics games all the time. He's clearly saying he just doesn't want to get in to having to determine what would be required to do it LEGALLY so he's avoiding the entire situation. And then he goes and has just ONE of the candidates on. Clearly, based upon the quotes in the article I linked, he KNOWS having just ONE of the candidates on is CLEARLY ILLEGAL. Do you dispute that he knew having one on would be illegal? If not, can we just stop this stupid semantic tangential discussion that offers no value?

Trump's Campaign says they were never contacted. It would be illegal regardless as Lorne Michaels said in the interview where he also said no candidates for President would appear on SNL before the election.

Lorne Michaels knew it and said it wouldn't happen: https://latenighter.com/news/lorne-michaels-nixes-pre-election-candidate-cameos-on-snl/

The official WH stenography pool tbought that, not us. The video suggests it as well. The only people who have suggested different are Bidens handler's who might be slightly biased.

Just a tweet? Not the actual poll? How typical of you. This one begs to differ: https://emersoncollegepolling.com/november-2024-iowa-poll-trump-53-harris-43/

Enforcing our immigration laws is not punishment, welcher.

I think Posty won his first thread evah.

So, trial started today. Some revelations that came out from police testimony: - When the cops got there the "victim" had a pulse. - The cops chose not to give Mouth to Mouth to the "victim" because he looked like a drug user and they didn't want to get Hepatitis. - Instead, the gave him Narcan and watched him die. https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/01/us/daniel-penny-trial-jordan-neely-death/index.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14030841/daniel-penny-jordan-neely-chokehold-trial-nyc-subway.html Why did this hero get arrested again?

The post I replied to didn't mention Fraud, nor did it quote a post mentioning Fraud. IOW, I was responding to a standalone post and my point was pretty simple: Trump is not nuts for closely watching the elections. And I cited proof as to why. It doesn't have to be fraud by the government. We know Trump believes he got focked last election. If he gets focked it doesn't matter whether it's government fraud or some other reason. He's going to be watching the election like a hawk especially in the swing states. Need more proof? Here you go: https://lancasteronline.com/news/politics/lancaster-county-da-commissioners-link-fraudulent-voter-registrations-to-paid-canvassing-update/article_5132ce60-92dd-11ef-9ec2-d32918af4f5b.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share

No. It means you either don't understand his comment or are trying for one of your gotchas. Either way you look bad. Do better.

No. I made a fool of you. I never mentioned fraud. Just said Trump's concerns are not unfounded. If one believes in fair elections that don't disenfranchise voters, from ANY party, one would acknowledge this. The fact that Trump has to file valid lawsuits before the election is even over is sad. We should expect more from the people running the election.

As I understand it it's also illegal but no one will be held accountable.

Dunno don't care not relevant.

Sure bud, but black people can't get an I.D. LOL

What?

I never said anything about that deadline. The county's stated X position was that anyone in line at the deadline would be able to get a ballot but at the same time they were out there telling people in line to leave before that deadline. Why are you in favor of voter disenfranchisement?

So you think Trump sued because he thought Dem voters were being disenfranchised?

So you don't dispute that Trump had to sue because people were being turned away. That's all you had to say.

Remember, these idiots wanted Avenatti to run for President.

Trump had to sue because a county in PA was turning away voters and a judge forced them to stay open for two more days as a result. So apparently there is some validity to Trump's concerns.

You think it's gonna end after Trump wins? You think they're going to ignore all the future impeachments?

They're just one upping Trump: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-sues-cbs-news-10-billion-alleging-deceptive-doctoring-harris-60-minutes-interview

Probably because God hates charlatans and sent Mike a message saying as much.

ROFLMAO. Musk didn't show up and the judge refused to stop the giveaway. Musk FTW!!!