Jump to content

Strike

Members
  • Content Count

    34,976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Strike last won the day on October 26 2023

Strike had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,827 Excellent

About Strike

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

30,597 profile views
  1. Do you or don't you believe that a country should have control of it's borders?
  2. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    You owe EG a big apology as well.
  3. Strike

    Geek Club Fantasy Neckcar 2024

    Unapproved glove modification. LOL
  4. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    You bringing up Covid???? ROFLMAO
  5. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    I want to have "serious discussion" Tim. I want you to show me where, in the judgment I posted a link to, it says it's about tax fraud. You seem so sure of it.
  6. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    Right, like when you proved that SBF wasn't going to testify in front of congress because some kid in a gaming chat room told you so?
  7. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    As I've said repeatedly, I am fine with debating people on FACTS. We should able to agree on those because they're easily verifiable. It's when someone asserts something as fact and argues with you about it that it gets tiring. And that's Tim. All the time. I posted the actual judgment so he could prove me wrong if his assertion is correct. He refuses to even read the document. I mean, you can lead a horse to water and all that....
  8. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    ROFLMAO. Posting random quotes to try for a "gotcha." So sad.
  9. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    Apparently at that time I was using my laptop. This morning I'm on my desktop with a 40+ inch screen. Hope the notion of people having multiple computers isn't too hard for you to grasp.
  10. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    Why won't you read the judgement? It's not a little detail. it's the crux of the discussion we, I, and EG have been having for the last couple hours. You supposedly want to have "serious discussion." Serious discussion starts with a meeting of the minds on FACTS. You stated that the 400+ million dollar judgment had to do with tax fraud after it was pointed out that the banks didn't consider themselves victims or having been defrauded. I have asserted, and presented evidence (the actual judgment) that this is not true. That's not a focking detail. It's your whole argument to justify why the judgment is valid.
  11. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    You're wrong and just making sh*t up again. As I said, I read the ACTUAL judgement. I linked it for you. Go read it. Find a charge of tax fraud in it.
  12. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    He's just so focking ignorant. It gets tiring.
  13. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    Tim, are you aware that the article you just linked is a DIFFERENT CASE than the one we're discussing? Also, from your article, So yeah the reason it's not in the decision I read is because it's a different case. What a shock that a multi billion dollar company would have multiple cases brought against it!!!!
  14. Strike

    [** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

    Yep, and he has the voter records to prove it.
  15. Strike

    Timmy’s thread for serious discussion and debate

    @The Real timschochet Here is a link to the judgment in the NY case: https://www.scribd.com/document/706231478/452564-2022-People-of-the-State-of-v-People-of-the-State-of-Decision-After-Trial-1688#fullscreen&from_embed I was a little skeptical of your claims that this was about NY being cheated out of taxes but I haven't followed this case THAT closely. Unlike you, I don't make assertions I can't prove. But I just read through the first 17 pages of this 92 page document. Now, granted, it might be covered in the rest of the document that I didn't read, but I read well past the point of listing the seven causes of action in the complaint. None of them asserts tax fraud against anyone. So, if you could, please point me to the portion of the document having to do with tax fraud. I'd even settle for a news report from one of your vaunted MSM sources alleging tax fraud, and we can go from there. Anyone else notice a pattern with Tim? He makes assertions, and then when called out on the lack of factual basis for those assertions, he says those of us calling him out are "wrong" and it's our "job" to prove to him what is wrong with his assertion, even though his assertion has no basis in fact. Then he says we're not worth arguing/discussing with and takes his ball and goes home. Yet he says he wants "serious discussion and debate." Like hell he does.
×