Strike

There is a difference between being BANNED and being suspended. HTH.

Link to me saying it bothers me? Think what you want but quit pretending you base it on anything other than your "feelings."

Weird you would feel that way considering Nate Silver now has Trump ahead and the RCP average now has Trump winning all the swing States for the first time. But we all know you rely on data when it supports your worldview and ignore it when it doesn't.

All is well!!!! https://www.bankrate.com/credit-cards/news/credit-utilization-survey/?tpt=b

So they found ID on one of Sinwar's bodyguards who was killed along with him. You'll never guess who the guy worked for? Yup. U.N. employee. That organization is so focking corrupt. Makes me sick. Throw them out of New York and quit it.

Just everyone in attendance at the event. But yeah, you know better as always.

I've answered them.

Tim opened his big mouth before the election. He opted to end the bet early. Which is fine but, as EG noted, Tim had not won the bet based on the terms of the bet. He should have paid as soon as he requested the end of the bet. He didn't. Welcher. Only after massive pressure did he then request several of us to rule on the bet. Even after I ruled against him he said he didn't agree with my ruling. The FACT that had the bet been allowed to run it's full duration Tim would have lost proves that my analysis was correct. I don't believe one person other than Tim disagreed with my ruling . A couple said it was a sucky way to lose a bet but they understood the ruling. And it all stemmed from Tim wanting to be a d*ck and gloat two months before the bet was supposed to end. If I were Tim and my opponent chose not to take his winnings because of MY actions, at the very least I would donate the bet winnings to charity. Tim shouldn't get off of the bet due to his own d*ck moves simply because the winner chose not to collect. But regardless, Tim refused to pay until he started getting mocked in to oblivion on this bored. That makes him a welcher. There is no evidence he has paid everyone else either. So, you guys can let him off if you want but he's a welcher as far as I'm concerned.

Can you write this again, in English?

What? You didn't follow that whole fiasco? Tim tried to end the bet early and asked everyone to pay him. EG said ok we can end the bet early but I won. Tim balked at that and specifically called me out as one of the arbiters of who won the bet. He promised to go by whatever decision I made. I posted my reasoning and I agreed with EG. Therefore, Tim was on the hook to pay EG. At that point EG said he didn't want Tim's money. There are threads on this. You can go look for them but please don't suggest I don't know what I'm talking about. @The Real timschochet dragged me in to it.

I don't believe so. He didn't pay EG and, while EG ended up telling Tim to fock off and no need to pay him, EG DID make a claim at first which Tim welched on. The fact that EG ended up deciding it just wasn't worth it to collect doesn't change the fact that Tim denied the request to pay him and thus, in my mind, makes him a welcher. Since then I've asked Tim on multiple occasions to post a list of everyone he bet and the resolution to those bets and he has declined. I only know of one, maybe two people, who have said he paid them. So I have no evidence that he paid everyone and I know for a fact there is one he didn't pay. So, welcher. QLazzTim.

He wasn't this time. Maybe due to the Covid recession his dad's business tanked a bit and he couldn't take the hit. Or maybe he's just QLazzarus in disguise and he's willing to take the money if he wins but pusses out when he loses. I don't know. I'm not in his head. Thank God.

And yet whenever I check 538 they seem to be missing some polls. I wonder why..........

Tim bet 6 people from this forum alone that Biden would be on the ballot. Granted, he welched on several of those bets but he still made the bets to begin with.

Trump ahead in EVERY swing state in the RCP average.

My source was fine. I realize it wasn't as good as a tweet like you posted, or a gaming chat room as you've relied on in the past, but it was fine.

My statement was "constantly", not "always.". I was noting a trend. I'm not playing your gotcha games. Have a nice day.

If I were still a drinkin man that would have been a good drinkin game, but then I wouldn't have made it in to work today.

Why would I? I'm not wrong. We've seen it over and over again with this administration. Quit trying for the "gotcha" moments dude.

You should fire him!!

You read the article but didn't really comprehend it. Not unexpected.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4937489-harris-election-trend-concerns/

I'm not talking about that. I have no idea who was asking for the hard stop at the end of the interview. I have not asserted that her team was trying to throw in the towel. I suspect it was his team, needing time to prepare the interview for airing at the top of the hour.

His show airs at 6 PM EST. She had a commitment and couldn't be there to do the interview live. So she was supposed to be there an hour before his show airs to do the interview. Her people limited the length as well. Then she shows up late. Just throws the whole schedule off and limits the length even more.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/17/politics/trump-assassination-independent-review-secret-service/index.html OUCH!!!!