Strike

Here's how stupid KamalaToe is. Watch her admit vulnerable democrats don't want to go anywhere near her:

Oh look. Tim found another poll to cherry pick and post about. Tim is being UNBIASED again.

Says the guy who touts every poll that favors Kamala, and then when they turn in Trump's favor or in his momentum just blows them off. Says the guy who was all over the betting markets until the betting markets started favoring Trump. Says the guy who doesn't understand that a Super PAC poll is NOT the same thing as a Trump internal poll. Talk about lazy. You're the laziest poster here.

If those people believe they were better off due to Trump's policies, they're making a reasoned decision. That's what is happening. You can disagree that his policies were the reason people were better off but I, and a lot of other people, would not agree with your assessment.

I don't agree but as I said to Tim it doesn't matter. That is not the general perception and memory people have of that time. Until Covid the perception is we were very prosperous under Trump and the exact opposite under Kamalatoe/Biden.

@The Real timschochet We could discuss WHY things were good under Trump but it's irrelevant. The reality is people will look at how they were doing under that administration and compare it to the current one which Kamalatoe is a part of and who says she wouldn't change a thing they did during her time in the administration. They have DATA to compare and they will ask if they want four more years of what it was like under Trump, and will discount the Covid year as the freak incident it was, or do they want four more years of what it has been like under Kamalatoe/Biden. And they will decide they would like to unburden themselves from what has been under Kamalatoe. That's just how this works and if you don't understand that you aren't as politically astute as you think you are. On another note, for the last week or two as people have been posting betting lines and you've said repeatedly "that's only on Polymarket" or "That's only one site. The rest are for Kamalatoe." Well, now it's pretty much universal that Trump is the betting favorite: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-takes-commanding-lead-over-harris-across-betting-markets?intcmp=tw_fbn&%3Fintcmp=tw_fbn Maybe consider changing the title so you don't look like such a partisan hack? I mean, for ONE day or less you had a title that slightly suggested Trump had a chance to win and then almost as quickly as you changed it you changed it again to "dead heat." It's certainly not a dead heat at this point if only due to momentum change over the last week or so. But feel free to keep showing your true hackery if you must.

1) There are multiple reasons for being against this. 2) Allowed to grow unfettered that's the likely outcome. The fact that it hasn't happened overnight doesn't change that likelihood. Just like letting in millions of illegal immigrants doesn't affect you or me in our local neighborhoods.....................YET.

Most of us who don't believe in biological males competing on biological women's sports teams don't care about the team's record or how good the player is at that sport. If a biological male was the last player on the bench of a 0-25 college basketball team and never played a minute in one game I would still be outraged. Your reasoning is flawed and suggests you clearly don't understand WHY we have an issue with biological males playing on biological women's sports teams.

He's trying to "gotcha" those of us who have an issue with biological males competing against biological females. We have those concerns for a variety of reasons but he latches on to one that he thinks makes us look like our concerns aren't justified to try to pull a "gotcha", especially against those of us who have made him look foolish in the past. It's his M.O. if you haven't been paying attention. Instead of laying out a clearly understood position and debating from that position, he just tries to pull a gotcha. All the time.

Anyone else notice how the Libs here like @The Real timschochet just ignore the issues that come up around Kamalatoe's campaign, like her plagiarism issue, CBS' 60 minutes editing controversy, etc....? They just pretend those things don't exist. I find it amusing but I do notice their silence.

Pressure keeps building for CBS to release the unedited transcripts of the Kamalatoe 60 minutes interview. I hope the real journalists out there don't let this go: https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1845966323572265056/photo/1

Trump endorsed by Las Vegas Review Journal. I am not familiar with this paper but I did look up the ownership and history and understand they likely lean strongly right. I post this not specifically because of the endorsement, but the FACTS and reasoning for the endorsement. Other than their stance on Jan 6th, which I mostly disagree with, they pretty much nail where I'm coming from, both in my reasoning for voting for Trump AND in why I don't believe Kamala is a worthy President. And I suspect this reasoning will resonate with many of the people here voting for Trump: https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/rj-endorses/las-vegas-review-journal-endorses-donald-trump-for-president-3188637/

I'm just hoping she answers the burning question everyone in America is waiting for - Did she grow up in a middle class home?

Baier is absolutely a conservative but is a highly respected and impartial interviewer or debate moderator. He is the most fair person either of these candidates will interact with from the media during this election. He will ask tough but fair questions of her. It should be an enlightening interview. She won't be able to claim ambush and will have to stand by her answers.

Trump did an interview with the National Association of Black Journalists. FFS.

Kamalatoe doesn't have any stated policies

That's Just like, your opinion, man. Sorry not waiting for another girl to be seriously injured to say "whoops I guess we were wrong about THIS biological male.".

Of course not because she a lying coont. But it might make me more comfortable with the possibility of her winning. But I've already made up my mind. This election is going to be decided by a small number of independents in a small number of states. Those are the people she's trying to convince.

No. It's a team sport and still requires skill. We don't need any more Payton McNabb's.

Normally I'm all in on the death penalty, but I am not in favor of this one: https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/13/us/robert-roberson-execution-shaken-baby-syndrome/index.html

The problem is that even in her interviews in friendly environments she hasn't answered questions. She throws out vague word salads that have even frustrated her supporters. That's why this media blitz she's been on hasn't been effective. If she tries that tactic with Bret Baier she will look very bad because he won't just let it go and move on. I am looking forward to this one. She will either come off as presidential, which she has not so far, or prove she is not worthy of the office as many of us believe.

Desperation. As much as Tim and OM want to think differently, her campaign is acting very desperate while Trump's is acting confident.

It will move the needle if she screws it up. Bret Baier may be fair but he won't be lobbing softballs.

Wat???? You can lose the match but still injure your opponent. I fail to see how you correlate winning and losing with safety. Care to explain that or are you just going to keep making the same illogical statement over and over?

Bret Baier is about as fair a journalist as you'll find. Should be a telling interview.