Strike

Oh yeah. She seems to have a lot of accents in her arsenal, kind of like HItlery has a lot of hot sauces in her purse.

Anyone hear her Jamaican accent on Colbert last night? I only saw a clip but it made me

Yeah but the $50 Tariff is brutal.

Until he realized no one wanted to discuss things with him.

Colbert asked Kamalatoe what she would do differently than Joe Biden. Her response:

Trans surgery is "rare": https://donoharmmedicine.org/2024/10/08/stop-the-harm-national-database-child-trans-industry/

@The Real timschochet Just curious what you think about how CBS News treated Tony Dokoupil after his interview with Ta-Nehisi Coates?

Remember how the libs try to tell us there is no indoctrination going on?

He's very GFIAFP'ian in that way. He probably helped save people on 9/11 too.

You're gonna be bigly disappointed big guy: https://nypost.com/2024/10/08/media/deadspin-loses-bid-to-toss-defamation-suit-over-article-accusing-young-chiefs-fan-of-racism/

Sure Tim. There you go again.

Tim, This is why you're so reviled by some of us around here, and specifically why *I* said you would destroy this bored when you arrived just like you did the PSF at FBG's. Here is a statement from you earlier this morning: So earlier today you said you thought KamalaToe had a "slight" edge but here you are guaranteeing her victory, doing exactly what your post from earlier was commenting on others doing. And then when (my opinion) she loses you're going to pretend you ONLY said "slight edge" and walk away from EVER guaranteeing her victory. How do I know this? Because you did THE EXACT SAME THING when Hitlery ran against Trump. And to this day you say you NEVER guaranteed she would win when in actuality you did repeatedly. And it makes having discussions with you infuriating because any of us who have done so long term know you do this. You just post sh*t without consistency and then latch on to whichever stance happens to win out. Most of us who actually like intelligent discussion take a stance, support it with data/logic, and live/die on that stance. But not you.

Everything you just said may be 100% accurate. Higher numbers still mean hotter when describing women. So, while YOU may think a given woman isnt that hot you've never told your buddy that a chick was a 1 and meant to convey that she was hot.

Nah. They should promote Nathaniel Hackett. Dude did a great job in Denver for 10 games!!!

Except Biden keeps repeating loudly how Kamalatoe was heavily involved in EVERYTHING the administration has done. I don't think she can distance herself from him.

And then welched on them.

Tim prefers sites that only sample data that supports his worldview so he can post links to them.

Yep. She also likely has The Clap.

I don't care if he speaks for the company or not. That was never his issue with Twitter before he bought it. His issue was with Twitter censoring conservative points of view. Nothing hypocritical unless he starts censoring libs.

How the fock would YOU make a profit owning a bar?

Twitter being politically neutral is not the same as Elon being politically neutral. HTH.

It's really difficult to keep my eyes focused on the waitresses eyes. Prob 32D if I had to guess........

That doesn't make one a hack. It's your job as someone on the other side to argue with that assertion. That assertion is more reasonable than most you make but that's what discussion is about. We can disagree on opinions and have a discussion about that. We CAN'T disagree on FACTS. When you post articles based upon faulty data and I prove that and you continue disputing it you're a hack. Big difference between those scenarios.

Tim I'm not going to argue with you. The link I posted is self explanatory so what you're telling me by disputing it is that you're a retard. Got it.

Who cares about 538. I literally posted the link to the data The Hill based the article Tim cited on. He apparently didn't even look at it. And he says he wants intelligent, informed discussion. But he is willfully ignorant. It gets tiring after a while.