Strike

WTF does climate change have to do with it? And No I don't know that you're all in for Nuclear. For years you weren't until I kept harping on you about it at FBG's and EVENTUALLY you SAID you changed your mind. You act like you've changed your stance but so does KamalaToe on everything. And your stance on things changes with the wind. And no they did not come off like morons. I have no doubt Elon Musk knows more about Nuclear than you do. And, as far as green energy goes, why don't you start a thread on it and we can have that discussion, and we'll include climate change, so we can really vet how much YOU know about it.

WTF was wrong with their discussion? Was a totally reasonable discussion about Nuclear energy. What is wrong with you? Seriously?

No issues for me with ABP.

Yup. To your point, here is CBS News when Trump announced it: And here is CBS News when KamalaToe copied him: But yeah, there's no bias there.

Dude I grew up in So. Cal. I know earthquakes. I was 2 miles from the epicenter of the Northridge earthquake when it hit. If it's not at least a 5.0 it's just a tremor. Heck, we had 5.5 aftershocks for a week after the Northridge quake.

That's not an earthquake.

Not prolly. Absolutely. He's one of the dirtier drivers in NASCAR. Fock him. I hope Dillon winning keeps Bubba Smolett from making the playoffs.

Did he misspeak when he put the wrong rank on his congresaional coin?

This is a lie. For example, Kamalatoe was not a DEI hire for Senator. She was elected fair and square. But she was absolutely a DEI choice for VP. Biden said so. Why do you lefties always make sh*t up?

I have no idea why he was picked and, by your own admission, neither do you. We both DO know why Kameltoe was picked. Your comparison of the two is flawed.

So you made an assertion not based in fact. Why am I not surprised?

What demographic is Vance appealing to that Trump doesn't????? I mean, you can simply look at Biden and KamalaToe and see what demographics she was chosen for. And let's not forget there are a number of people on this forum who don't believe KamalaToe was chosen for demographic purposes. It's been argued for the last week plus right here.

"Peaceful" protest left a police officer fighting for his life in Ferguson Friday night. Peaceful my a$$.

Rubin's Racin!!!! Git 'Er Done!!!! Lineup set. Looking forward to a solid last place.

Well, she believed a bunch of things that were unelectable so her people have been flip flopping for her since she got the nod. So yeah there's a little ambiguity there. And she should be announcing exactly what she does stand for. It should be published on her website. She should be answering questions from the press. These have been the standards for as long as I can remember. But just remember, you Dems keep rewriting the rules and standards and then complain when those short term choices come back to bite you in the butt. So you might want to look beyond ONE election and consider what the strategies of the last two Presidential elections that the Dems have employed might look like in future elections, from both parties. Personally, I don't like it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/-nightmare-special-counsels-assessment-bidens-mental-fitness-triggers-rcna137975

The Dems intentionally ran a guy for office who the AG said was too incompetent mentally to be prosecuted for treasonous crimes. GTFOH.

@The Real timschochet keeps talking about Kameltoe becoming such a better speaker. What he's not telling you is the reason for that is she's repeating the same speech OVER and OVER. Watch the video at the top of the following article. Sorry about the source but no other media has this montage: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/08/08/watch-kamala-harris-uses-exact-same-script-again-and-again/

There are two new Dexter series' that were just announced as well.

Why would we delay the election due to the ineptness of one party out of how many, 5 or so? There are plenty of choices. Honestly, we shouldn't allow parties to have any say in the election. I've never understood why the state pays for primary elections for some parties but not others and has rules that give some parties advantages over others, etc.....Parties shouldn't technically exist within our government. If private entities want to consider themselves parties, great. But for office? Anyone should be eligible based on certain criteria, such as a petition of a certain percentage of constituents, just to limit the number of candidates to a reasonable number. But organized entities (parties) shouldn't have anything to do with our elections.

No, he couldn't. He wouldn't have had any money. It would have been conceding the election to Trump 4 months early.

He didn't earn it. All the higher ups in the Dem party knew he wasn't there mentally. They LIED to us, and do their donors. That's the gaslighting. Without the support of his party the money doesn't come in and his campaign never gets off the ground. You know how I know that? Because that's what ended it a few weeks ago. Once the debate happened and they could no longer LIE to us about his cognitive state the money dried up. And when that happened his party forced him out. If it was "HIS CHOICE" he would still be the candidate. I mean, you don't think he backed out willingly, do you?

When is the last time you voted third party?