Strike

Thanks for the reminder. Didn't think the Nathan's contest was on until later. Happy 4th of July EG!

It's funny how libs dodge legit questions. Tells you all you need to know.

What does the E stand for in DEI?

No one can force Biden out. But if the donors stop donating money he has zero chance to win. Then it comes down to how selfish he is or does he want to give his party a chance by putting up another candidate. There are some legal hurdles to clear if he does choose to step aside though. Should be interesting.

You recall incorrectly.

You couldn't identify logic if Mr. Spock was focking you up the arse with his BVC.

If I wanted to look like an A$$, I'd go on vacation to an exotic location and then post on a low rent fantasy football message board the whole time.

So here is Tim asking EG to write something specific in the check Tim is requesting from EG: But Tim says he never claimed to have won the bet or requested payment. Then, Tim just wrote this: Apparently, Tim wanted EG to write a check to "charity" and put a memo on the check saying "for being a dumb ass." @The Real timschochet, why would you want someone to put that on a check to "charity?" Caught LYING again.

No. And I'm not going to go looking. You can if you'd like. I didn't think there was an issue on WHAT the bet was. It was simply that Biden would be the Dem nominee for President. Which Tim tried to claim early and then asked everyone to pay up early. Now that's far from a certainty and Tim looks like an A$$. What I will give you is a link to that analysis, because it incorporates quotes from several threads where Tim is asking for payment for this bet, which today he said he didn't do: I'm a little surprised you're acting as if you have no knowledge of this since you posted in that thread after all the discussion of the bet and Tim's welching:

Why are you evading my question? In hindsight, my logic and analysis look pretty good, doesn't it?

Yup. He's trying to rewrite history again. . I'll try to find it but he requested that EG write something specific in the note section of the check he wanted EG to send him. How can he not be demanding payment when he's asking for specific notations on the check?

So are you still upset/disappointed that I ruled against him? Or did my analysis end up being spot on?

Rudy for AG!!!!

You posted all over this forum DEMANDING people pay you. If you hadn't I wouldn't have had to arbitrate your bet with EG. As usual, you are trying to rewrite history.

But you would have had EG, and others, pay you for a bet you hadn't won and in fact are now likely to lose. My analysis was 100% right.

I think they already have enough. They just choose not to. May be one reason Joe is so reluctant to drop out. A Trump DOJ with legit evidence of wrongdoing.

I don't believe that to be the case. There has been plenty of evidence of his decline for a long time. We've been talking about it here. Heck, Hur said Biden broke the law but chose not to prosecute due him being old and feeble. Biden couldn't even remember when Beau died in his interview with Hur. Just because a lot of people ignored what was right in front of them doesn't make it untrue.

Regarding Kameltoe, I think the fact Brandon is even running again is a reflection on her. Joe said when he ran that he was a transition President. If the administration thought Kameltoe was even remotely capable of being President I think they would have put her up instead of Brandon. Now he's gonna be forced to quit and she's gonna get thrown out there. Good luck.

A speech is different than a debate. Ugh.

Learn to code.

You take BART in from Oakland.

It wasn't sucking cack that got her the jobs. It was the anal.

You said nobody will buy it. I gave you an example of someone who would, including my reasoning as to why. It won't sway those who were turned off by his performance in the debate last week but it will be reassuring to those pee brains like Tim and probably Rusty who harbor extreme TDS and are clinging to any reason to support Brandon.