Strike

He knows about that case. He says safety "in general" is an issue but we haven't proven it in THIS case (SJSU).

Whatever dude. Unlike you I'm willing to let others form their own opinions based upon the quoted text, instead of trying to browbeat them in to believing what I want by posting incomplete paragraphs and TELLING them what to think.

No you didn't. As I did in that thread, I will post the relevant paragraph, IN IT'S ENTIRETY unlike you, and let reader's of this thread form their own conclusions:

You're wrong about this. At least you've gotten past the "it's not happening" to "it's not widespread.".

Joe should also pardon all the J6 defendants in the name of fairness. They all did less treasonous things than Hunter anyways.

Nate Silver going ballistic about this. Damn.

I'm just happy to know Hunter is so grateful for this second chance and vows not to take it for granted. Reminds me of O.J. promising to bring the REAL killers to justice: https://x.com/mviser/status/1863383976922038385

This is your assertion but it's a flawed one. If they did have safety concerns and she was a biological female there would nothing they could do about it. At that point you just say "damn that chick is powerful" or whatever. But once you find out she's actually a dude the narrative changes to "Now I know WHY she's so powerful." There was a pro chick tennis player named Amelie Mauresmo. She's an actual chick but a lot of the female tennis players compared her to dudes. There was nothing they could do but I guaranfockingtee you if they found out she was actually a dude they wouldn't have been surprised. Of course, I've been TRYING to get you to understand that safety isn't the ONLY issue. Why you're so focused on that one issue I'll never understand. It's but ONE of SEVERAL issues people have with biological males in female sport.

It does matter. Because if he lied about this he likely lied about many other things. And I don't believe you don't have an opinion on this. You have an opinion on EVERYTHING.

Ok let me go a little deeper. And I doubt you will have this and I'm not trying to be difficult here. Do you have any evidence that anyone on her team other than maybe the coaches KNEW she was a biological male? Because my understanding is this ONLY became an issue this year and even one of the coaches got in to some trouble IIRC talking about it wrong and it seemed like even that coach was unaware until it became an issue. So I suspect her actual sex was hidden from a LOT of people until it somehow got leaked.

So question for our lib friends here at the GC - Worms, the Timmay's, Honcho, etc.... - Do you think Joe was telling the truth for the last 4+ years when he said he would not pardon Hunter and just changed his mind or do you think he intended to pardon him if needed the entire time?

Why does any of this matter? We're talking policy. And the stance or people such as myself and I believe Jerry although I don't want to speak for him, is that a biological male should not be playing on the biological female team, and safety is one of the reasons. If Gary Coleman wants to try out for the volleyball team as a girl I still wouldn't want him on the team even though I'm about 100% certain he wouldn't pose a safety issue for the girls for what should be obvious reasons. That wouldn't change my stance that he shouldn't be eligible to play on the team. Given you can't disprove it I'm just gonna assume you ARE on the autism spectrum because despite what I think is a very logical argument you keep clinging to this one specific aspect of this issue. Oh, and can you post the athletic history of THIS particular player because it my recollection that he is new to this team this year. I'd like to see his history of playing on other biologically female teams in the past since you are asserting he has been for at least 3 years. TIA.

Thanks. For some reason I was under the impression that you could only pardon for things a person was actually convicted of. That seems reasonable. It is VERY unsettling to know he can give anyone he wants a blanket pardon. But @The Real timschochet would be ok with that as long as he didn't say he wouldn't do it before doing it.

I'm concerned Trump will pardon all his children. Oh wait, his kids are upstanding citizens who have never even been accused of breaking a law, not POS'es who break the law daily.

So your stance is that we can't consider a biological male participating in a given female sport a safety issue unless something unsafe happens with that particular biological male? That's nucking futs.

Cool, so less than the 52 page "public" letter Hunter's lawyers released yesterday basically begging Joe to pardon him? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/30/hunter-biden-defense-sentencing-pardon/

Sure, pal. You're just like Biden. You talk a good game until confronted with the reality of it. I bet you'd be ok with getting rid of the filibuster if it meant codifying Roe v. Wade and packing the SCOTUS for the same reason.

They've got a whole hard drive full of illegal activity they could go after him for. But they could have gone after HItlery too in Trump's first term and they didn't, so I suspect Trump won't here either. Which is probably the correct thing to do. It's been longstanding policy to not go after previous administrations. While Hunter isn't technically part of the previous administration he's close enough that Trump should probably just let it to, for the good of the country. And because it's the exact OPPOSITE of what Biden did in going after Trump. Let's try to get back to the norms that made this country great for so long.

Yeah, cause why should the elites have to take accountability for their transgressions as the average American does. I'm shocked you would be ok with this!!!!

This is incorrect as well.

Former FBI agents love this pick: https://djt.nucleusemail.com/amplify/v/2zNzCccqN7?hids=65GmuK7Yw1&_nlid=thS9xgUb5M&_nhids=65GmuK7Yw1

I have told you all before. He decides on an opinion and works back from that instead of using data, logic, and critical thinking to form his opinions.

This is a lie. Affirmative Action is racism and was organized, systemic, and run by the state.

Safety is absolutely a concern, ESPECIALLY in ths sport. Ask Payton McNabb, who is still dealing with her injuries. But it's not the ONLY concern. The point is that these schools are forfeiting due to a biological male competing on the other team. There are multiple reasons this is bad and I don't think most of us who are opposed to biological males competing want to be laser focused on any single reason. @The Real timschochet There is nothing a-holish about the question I asked. i was asked it just yesterday by someone else, for a different reason. I was not offended. Why do you consider asking someone that a-holish? ti's a legit question. People on the spectrum think and behave differently. I am not insulting or demeaning him by asking that question. But that's your MO - look for things to be offended by even if they're not offensive. By the way, my answer yesterday was "not as far as I know", which isn't to say I couldn't be mildly on the spectrum. It is my belief that we all have varying levels of some type of mental issue, based upon our scientific definitions of mental issues. When it becomes a problem is when one has too much of that issue. It explains much of the difference in behaviors and attitudes between different people.

The better question is do YOU believe there is racism against whites in this country?