Strike

How did I backtrack? There is NO EVIDENCE that he got lower rates. A judge deciding he did without evidence is idiotic. So you can join the list of those who will be proven wrong when this lawfare case is tossed on appeal.

The judge's findings were made without a trial. The whole sham is very likely to be overturned on appeal. So you can believe his "findings" if you want, but you'll very likely end up with egg on your face when all is said and done. The actual bankers who loaned Trump the money testified, FOR HIM, in the part of the trial they actually held related to damages. They had no problems with how the loans were processed or the documentation Trump provided. There is no actual evidence that he got better rates due to any assertions he made on his loan documents. That is all from the fantasy world of Letitia James and the judge. So gloat while you can because the judge "found" that Trump got better rates, but prepare for the time when you have to admit that wasn't the case.

So you believe Trump DID get better rates? Just want this on the record.

Trump didn't get any "better rates" for anything. WTF are you talking about?

You're not too bright, are you? Much of LeBitchia James' case is based on the tax valuations of Trump properties. NO ONE actually thinks Jon Stewart should be prosecuted/indicted. We are just joking about it due to the hypocrisy because NEITHER Trump or Stewart should be prosecuted.

Good to know you're as ignorant on this case as @The Real timschochet, who had to admit his ignorance when he tried to claim this was about taxes. Good job.

When is Letitia James indicting Jon Stewart? https://nypost.com/2024/03/27/real-estate/jon-stewart-found-to-have-overvalued-his-nyc-home-by-829/

First a cop gets murdered. Now a thread gets murdered. What is this world coming to?

Google Howard Kieffer lawyer, and that's Worms.

I've never run for President and had to deal with a coordinated legal effort trying to prevent me from doing so. Have you? Doesn't change the fact that an indictment doesn't mean sh*t. Good to see the lawfare is having it's intended effect on you though, "Counselor."

"Lawyer" who doesn't know that an indictment isn't worth the paper it's written on, that one of our main legal principles is innocent until proven guilty. Such a fake lawyer.

REDDIT generates revenue. It has never been profitable: https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/23/tech/reddit-ipo-filing-business-plan/index.html

Happens all the time Tim. You work in real estate. One would think you'd have an understanding of how business works. Another example. REDDIT. Has been around a lot longer than Trump's site. People valued it pretty highly this week too.

I never thought it couldn't get worse in Oakland. Why are you selling them short?

At least you're finally admitting that Coors Light is water.

We really don't need to hear about your masturbation habits

Depnding on the women folk there may still be Chubbs....

No one is forcing you to watch them.

Yeah, probably

OMG that mouth in your video. Looks like Bugs Bunny.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/20/us/willie-pye-georgia-execution/index.html

Georgia has one scheduled for tonight. Let's hope some lib judge doesn't f it up.

When the DOW was setting records under Trump the lib mantra was that it only helped the rich because poor and middle class people don't invest in the stock market. Way to be consistent lol

Heavily in favor of it. I've addressed in previous posts how all concerns raised above can be addressed. It's a no brainer for dealing with those who have forfeited their right to live through their actions.

Can't read it due to paywall. Remember when you said taxpayers were the victim because the case was about tax fraud, when it had NOTHING to do with tax fraud at all? And then you accused me of always focusing on irrelevant semantic details when I called you on it, and then you had to swallow your pride and admit you were 100% wrong and totally ignorant? Good times.....