Strike

That was not a typo you lying POS. Nice try though

Like you give a sh*t. And for the record, his name is spelled Trayvon Martin. If you're gonna virtue signal like you care, at least spell his name correctly. SAY HIS NAME SQUIZZY!!!!!

Libs didn't care when Biden was calling for VIOLENCE!!!! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/07/bernie-sanders-attacks-joe-biden-mini-super-tuesday

Dude, at a certain point you just have to ignore him. He says he provides "evidence" but all he provides are talking points. He's like @The Real timschochet. We provide ACTUAL, INDISPUTABLE evidence and he says "see they ignore my evidence talking points."

This is as far as I had to go. If you missed it then yes you missed it but Biden knowingly took classified documents. And that's illegal. The report even said so. It just said he was too old and feeble to prosecute which, the last time I looked, were NOT valid reasons not to prosecute someone. I'm sorry you're so misinformed.

Yep but we can't control pigeon boy.

No, Trump didn't do the exact same thing as Biden. Biden did WORSE, as Jon explained above. So, why is Trump being prosecuted when Biden (I'm not bringing Hitlery in to this for simplicity) committed a far worse offense? So, either you dispute the FACT that Biden illegally took classified docs as a Senator, or you should be able to explain why he's not being prosecuted other than it being a political witch hunt. THAT is what I expect you to respond to.

I was at FBG's and can confirm that jonmx was jonmx over there too. And you haven't responded to my post. I guess you don't have a good answer. That's what happens when presented with FACTS.

Wait, wut? Biden had classified documents from his time as Senator. A Senator can only view classified documents in a SCIF and is prohibited from removing them from that SCIF. Are you disputing these FACTS? Be careful how you answer. Your credibility is already on thin ice. Don't completely destroy it due to your partisan leanings.

Well, you can go research it if you'd like. Or you can be ignorant like @The Real timschochet

This isn't about McDonalds. As I said, research the issue. It's about "right to repair" and a lot of large corporations are caught up in it. This is one area where I'm ok with the government getting involved. It's laws they passed that allow this issue to exist in the first place.

Yes clearly McDonalds is poorly run. Barely anyone has even heard of them.

I rarely support government actions but in this case they are right. You should read up on the issue and other right to repair issues. Companies are taking advantage of the law as written.

Tim, I don't think you even googled it yourself before posting this. Because I just did and the evidence doesn't support your assertions. Did you think we wouldn't call your bluff?

Or the baseball field where congress is holding it's annual game.........

Not only that but what Tim posts rarely matches up to what he "heard." He's like the last guy in the circle when they do one of those exercises where they tell the first person a story and have them relay it to the next, and that person to the next, and the next around the circle, and the last person tells the story and it's totally different than the original story. That's Tim. But he doesn't need a circle of people to screw up the story. He hears something, translates it on to what he WANTS the story to be, and boom that's the story he posts on the Interwebs as if it's true. I've caught him too many times to trust him without a link so I can verify what he's posting.

No.

I'm not contradicting anything. I said *I* don't condone it. And I don't. I also don't believe you without a link. Not sure how that's contradictory but you do love to bastardize the English language so you be you.

When lefties do it it's free speech. When righties do it it's the end of our country. Get back to me when you give equal weight to both sides. And I'm not condoning the behavior. Without a link about THIS incident I have no faith that you're not just making it up. Or did you "hear" that he got death threats?

Sorry to hear man. Any signs it was coming?

I agree with this. If he didn't disqualify her and didn't allow new, relevant evidence in the case it would be appealed and delay things even more. He's just making sure his decision stands up to scrutiny.

1) This isn't a legal system issue. It's a congressional inquiry issue. 2) No. To the extent the legal system IS being used towards her, it's being used properly. Just because she chose to abuse the system doesn't mean that someone else investigating her is doing the same.

Biden the anti-semite sanctioned Israel and at the same time is giving Iran a sanctions waiver to allow them to access 10 billion dollars. What a POS.

I've never driven one but it sounds like Tesla's are confusing in how you choose forward/reverse/autopilot. Don't see why it needs to be but that's "new" technology I guess.

In. Duke