Strike

6 ft rule that Fauci admitted he made up with no basis in science. That's one.

He's as big as a band

I'm a little biased so for me......TP & the HB's but probably the correct answer is Boston Boston.

It's a war Tim. You think kids didn't die in WWII? Should we have quit that war "for the children?"

Who gives a sh*t. Any parent that needs the government to tell them how to parent is a poor parent. Do your own research parents, something @The Real timschochet knows nothing about.

Do you or don't you believe that a country should have control of it's borders?

You owe EG a big apology as well.

Unapproved glove modification. LOL

You bringing up Covid???? ROFLMAO

I want to have "serious discussion" Tim. I want you to show me where, in the judgment I posted a link to, it says it's about tax fraud. You seem so sure of it.

Right, like when you proved that SBF wasn't going to testify in front of congress because some kid in a gaming chat room told you so?

As I've said repeatedly, I am fine with debating people on FACTS. We should able to agree on those because they're easily verifiable. It's when someone asserts something as fact and argues with you about it that it gets tiring. And that's Tim. All the time. I posted the actual judgment so he could prove me wrong if his assertion is correct. He refuses to even read the document. I mean, you can lead a horse to water and all that....

ROFLMAO. Posting random quotes to try for a "gotcha." So sad.

Apparently at that time I was using my laptop. This morning I'm on my desktop with a 40+ inch screen. Hope the notion of people having multiple computers isn't too hard for you to grasp.

Why won't you read the judgement? It's not a little detail. it's the crux of the discussion we, I, and EG have been having for the last couple hours. You supposedly want to have "serious discussion." Serious discussion starts with a meeting of the minds on FACTS. You stated that the 400+ million dollar judgment had to do with tax fraud after it was pointed out that the banks didn't consider themselves victims or having been defrauded. I have asserted, and presented evidence (the actual judgment) that this is not true. That's not a focking detail. It's your whole argument to justify why the judgment is valid.

You're wrong and just making sh*t up again. As I said, I read the ACTUAL judgement. I linked it for you. Go read it. Find a charge of tax fraud in it.

He's just so focking ignorant. It gets tiring.

Tim, are you aware that the article you just linked is a DIFFERENT CASE than the one we're discussing? Also, from your article, So yeah the reason it's not in the decision I read is because it's a different case. What a shock that a multi billion dollar company would have multiple cases brought against it!!!!

Yep, and he has the voter records to prove it.

@The Real timschochet Here is a link to the judgment in the NY case: https://www.scribd.com/document/706231478/452564-2022-People-of-the-State-of-v-People-of-the-State-of-Decision-After-Trial-1688#fullscreen&from_embed I was a little skeptical of your claims that this was about NY being cheated out of taxes but I haven't followed this case THAT closely. Unlike you, I don't make assertions I can't prove. But I just read through the first 17 pages of this 92 page document. Now, granted, it might be covered in the rest of the document that I didn't read, but I read well past the point of listing the seven causes of action in the complaint. None of them asserts tax fraud against anyone. So, if you could, please point me to the portion of the document having to do with tax fraud. I'd even settle for a news report from one of your vaunted MSM sources alleging tax fraud, and we can go from there. Anyone else notice a pattern with Tim? He makes assertions, and then when called out on the lack of factual basis for those assertions, he says those of us calling him out are "wrong" and it's our "job" to prove to him what is wrong with his assertion, even though his assertion has no basis in fact. Then he says we're not worth arguing/discussing with and takes his ball and goes home. Yet he says he wants "serious discussion and debate." Like hell he does.

Dude let him have his safe space. He's super serial about issues!!!!

Come on dude. That's the kind of tranny @The Real timschochet dreams about at night.

Rubbin's Racing Fellas!!!! Git 'r done!!!

The banks who were the supposed victims of Trump's fraud disagree with your assessment.