Strike

Well I answered this last night before you even wrote it. I must have had a premonition or something.......

How would you get that from what I wrote?

Yep, and I deleted that post. Here you go: Troy Carter. So you're wrong again.

That wasn't your point You were responding to a Tim post about how the republicans should campaign against Kameltoe and you said they should paint her as a DEI hire. Why do you keep pretending you didn't say that?

WTF does this have to with anything?

Man, this is when this bored just gets very tedious. I shouldn't have to go through this detailed analysis but you're forcing me to. No, I didn't misunderstand. Your post, that I replied to, was in response to a post about how @The Real timschochet hopes the GOP campaigns against her in a certain way. And you replied: The clear meaning of your post is that they should ALSO campaign against her as a DEI hire. You support that by saying ALL left leaning minority politicians are DEI hires. I assume you mean to right leaning people. You may have been trying to open the door to a discussion about all minority lefty politicians but I'm only concerned about Kameltoe. So I responded accordingly, limiting my comment to Kameltoe. Your subsequent posts make no logical sense. Because Kameltoe IS part of that minority group you're talking about. So, when I say Kameltoe is in fact a DEI hire that's a valid statement. Either you dispute that she's a DEI hire, which really can't be done since Joe did in fact choose her because of her minority status, or the discussion should be over. For some reason you're fixated on expanding the pool of discussion to all minority candidates. I'm not really interested in that discussion because this thread is about the Presidential election. But, you'd be wrong anyways. Most politicians are elected to their position. That's by definition not a DEI hire. So no, righties don't think ALL minority politicians are DEI hires.

So Kameltoe isnt a DEI hire but all other minority politicians are? Ok, whatever you say ROFLMAO.

Tried what? I responded to your assertion that Kameltoe is not a DEI hire. We know she is. I don't care about other politicians in a thread about the state of the Presidential election.

Has nothing to do with whether Kameltoe IS one. She is.

Why? For not being a freeloader? You should be proud. And let's not forget you had no issues taking advantage of our welfare system. I never did. And I'm not calling you out for it. I'm glad it helped you. But don't pretend you never took a government handout.

Not true but the fact that Biden promised to choose a minority makes her one.

Well, apparently they weren't SS for the most part. So that was probably part of the problem. And shows either an indifference or incompetence of the higher ups in the SS. This wench should be forced to resign.

I don't disagree that Idiocracy is more of a documentary than we'd care to admit, but Hulk Hogan ain't the reason.

He's no @drobeski that's for sure.

Not in one. I dislike Trump with a passion personally. But I don't disparage him for things I have no evidence of.

Me too. And it's more expensive. I don't get it. Of course, I have a rack in my basement and host all my own sh*t so I may be a little biased.

Same for us. On prem is fine but some of the stuff that we rely on outside vendors for was impacted.

Secret Service looking worse and worse: https://x.com/HawleyMO/status/1814278991605350726?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1814278991605350726|twgr^28e29055fd6cc572a33c6676c16ecf5e6349e8e3|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fsmoosieq%2F2024%2F07%2F19%2Fhawley-whistleblowers-reveal-even-more-troubling-details-about-trump-rally-security-failures-n2177102

Fixed your post.

Bullsh*t. Unlike Biden, Trump has called or visited a LOT of people hit by tragedies such as this, throughout his Presidency and even in the years he wasn't President. It's fine to criticize Trump for things but don't make stuff up. You have no idea his level of sincerity in these situations, and he has never shown any indication that it wasn't sincere.

@RLLD Any chance you can change the thread title? I realize we're just a low rent message board, although we did make the news when that dude from Texas ran for office, but I"m not a fan of publicizing the name of people who do heinous things. It just encourages more of the same.

Sure buddy. Cause what she did worked so well.

The guy who showed up on a bored he vowed never to step foot in, 18 years after I joined, is accusing me of following him around from thread to thread? Just making sh*t up again.

You missed my point. That's not surprising. You usually do. I AM surprised that some of the others did as well though. The point isn't that she had a terrible campaign strategy. Anyone can make that mistake. It's an art, not a science. The point is that she was dismissive of one of the most savvy political minds of our lifetimes. It'd be like you started a venture capital firm, and Warren Buffett volunteered to be on the BOD. Then, you decided to invest your entire nut in to an unproven widget company. Warren Buffett said don't do it and gave you 10 reasons not to. But you ignored him and did it anyways and lost all your VC. That would be a good indication that you are a horrible businessman. Not because you invested and lost but because you ignored the advice of one of the best resources you could ever have at your disposal.

No, she wouldn't. And I'll give you one example of why. During her campaign, her husband kept telling her and her team that they were focking it up and offering suggestions on how to win. His wife and her team IGNORED ALL OF HIS ADVICE. Why would you ignore Bill focking Clinton? I'm not a fan of the man but FFS he knew how to win a presidential election. But she thought she knew better. So No, she wouldn't have been a great President. Not even a good one.