Strike

True dat. Libs don't care about a slut who sleeps her way to to the top. If it isn't Trump allegedly banging a porn star it's not worth being outraged about!!!

Where did you get 30 minutes? I've seen a couple of articles saying it will be 15.

This was discussed in the debate thread. Those of us with reasonable critical thinking skills knew what he meant - low skilled jobs. Because let's be serious Peenie. A lot of AA's work in low skilled jobs. If the majority of AA's were working in the banking industry we probably wouldn't be talking about DEI/affirmative action all the time. We also probably wouldn't have the quantity of poor AA's we do. But to people like you who look for racism in EVERYTHING Trump's comment just has to be racist, right? What do you think about the following comments: "If you don't vote for me you ain't black." About Barack Obama: " I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that’s a storybook, man " " Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids." Can you post links to the threads you started about the comments above. TIA

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/04/democratic-donors-wont-finance-party-until-joe-biden-drops-out.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Please don't. Remember, there are others participating in this thread. If you must, use PM.

@TimHauck looking especially stupid today.

Watched it last night. It's okay but a lot of regurgitated stuff. Worth watching but I wouldn't pay money to see it.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/conspiracy-of-silence-to-protect-joe-biden.html

That's the problem with DEI, and affirmative action before it. it's not unreasonable to assume a person hired because of those programs is not the best person for the job. It doesn't mean they're incompetent but if they were the best person for the job they wouldn't have had to use a program like AA or DEI to get the job. In the case of Kameltoe, we know for a fact she isn't the best person for the job. She couldn't even sniff winning her own state and had to drop out of the race for President, and we know Biden chose her for every reason EXCEPT competence. Oh, and Joe Biden is proud to be the first black woman to serve with a black President: https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1808939748934795503?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1808939748934795503|twgr^e151b5aee3d254f5d29e15163504543fbaaf6977|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fnick-arama%2F2024%2F07%2F04%2Fbiden-just-said-he-was-proud-to-be-first-black-woman-n2176383

Not necessarily. Just want to be able to have a discussion from a point of common understanding. Can't believe it took 4 hours to get there but whatever. You said earlier that DEI was about giving everyone a FAIR chance. But then why wouldn't the E stand for equality? There's a reason the social justice people have pivoted from using words like "equality" to "equity." I'm sure we'll disagree on that but I'm telling you that is why people who lean further right than you take issue with DEI.

I know what it stands for. I want to make sure we're on the same page regarding that. Why are you so unwilling to put it in to words?

Thanks for the reminder. Didn't think the Nathan's contest was on until later. Happy 4th of July EG!

It's funny how libs dodge legit questions. Tells you all you need to know.

What does the E stand for in DEI?

No one can force Biden out. But if the donors stop donating money he has zero chance to win. Then it comes down to how selfish he is or does he want to give his party a chance by putting up another candidate. There are some legal hurdles to clear if he does choose to step aside though. Should be interesting.

You recall incorrectly.

You couldn't identify logic if Mr. Spock was focking you up the arse with his BVC.

If I wanted to look like an A$$, I'd go on vacation to an exotic location and then post on a low rent fantasy football message board the whole time.

So here is Tim asking EG to write something specific in the check Tim is requesting from EG: But Tim says he never claimed to have won the bet or requested payment. Then, Tim just wrote this: Apparently, Tim wanted EG to write a check to "charity" and put a memo on the check saying "for being a dumb ass." @The Real timschochet, why would you want someone to put that on a check to "charity?" Caught LYING again.

No. And I'm not going to go looking. You can if you'd like. I didn't think there was an issue on WHAT the bet was. It was simply that Biden would be the Dem nominee for President. Which Tim tried to claim early and then asked everyone to pay up early. Now that's far from a certainty and Tim looks like an A$$. What I will give you is a link to that analysis, because it incorporates quotes from several threads where Tim is asking for payment for this bet, which today he said he didn't do: I'm a little surprised you're acting as if you have no knowledge of this since you posted in that thread after all the discussion of the bet and Tim's welching:

Why are you evading my question? In hindsight, my logic and analysis look pretty good, doesn't it?

Yup. He's trying to rewrite history again. . I'll try to find it but he requested that EG write something specific in the note section of the check he wanted EG to send him. How can he not be demanding payment when he's asking for specific notations on the check?

So are you still upset/disappointed that I ruled against him? Or did my analysis end up being spot on?

Rudy for AG!!!!