Strike

If what she said were true there wouldn't be a Trump case. Therefore, we know she's lying.

Did he get confused on the moon??

I don't know if this is the same document I posted for Tim or not. That was several weeks ago IIRC. However, the reason I had you post it was so that we'd be talking about the same document. I don't want to ASSUME what document you're talking about when you make some vague reference to a 92 page document. I could be thinking of some totally different document. This gives us a common understanding. Now, to the document you just posted. It's about the damages portion of the trial. The document I posted was about the summary judgment motions which decided the guilty/not guilty part of the trial. Totally separate so not sure why you'd expect the same arguments and/or valuations to be included in both. They're completely separate portions of the case. It's not like the two documents overlap in any significant manner other than being related to the same case.

ROFLMAO. Would be nice if you responded to what was posted and not what you wanted it to say.

The discussion is public. You can go back and read it if you'd like. Whether you'd be able to comprehend what you read is debatable.

Well that's a relief, especially since the discussion I was having had NOTHING to do with the damages amount Boyo

Come on man. @TimHauck and @Mike Honcho are centrists!!!!!

1) You didn't answer the question I posed to you up above. I wonder why........ 2) I provided a link to my supporting document. You didn't so I can't check your work. 3) I showed that I wasn't wrong. The fact that you get hard when you think you might have proven me wrong clouds your ability to see that. You should go whack off thinking of me so you can clear your mind and start being able to reason again.

By everyone's admission this law has NEVER been used in this manner and this is not the use case it was enacted for. This is simply a political witch hunt and using any law you can fit in to the round hole to get him. And that's wrong.

No, I won't admit I'm wrong. Why would I when I'm RIGHT? The judge based his valuation of Mar Logo on the assessed value of the property by the government. See page 26 of this document: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23991872/ny-ruling-on-trump-business-fraud.pdf He ignored the admitted the opinion from a submitted affidavit of a high end real estate broker who said Trump's valuation of that property was reasonable. Not that it should matter. As has been discussed ad nauseum, banks in these types of loan situations do their own due diligence. For you and Honcho I ask, do you really believe that the banks loaned Trump this money based simply on the documents he provided them without using their own people to make their own determinations on value and ability to pay?

What is a loan steward?

How did I backtrack? There is NO EVIDENCE that he got lower rates. A judge deciding he did without evidence is idiotic. So you can join the list of those who will be proven wrong when this lawfare case is tossed on appeal.

The judge's findings were made without a trial. The whole sham is very likely to be overturned on appeal. So you can believe his "findings" if you want, but you'll very likely end up with egg on your face when all is said and done. The actual bankers who loaned Trump the money testified, FOR HIM, in the part of the trial they actually held related to damages. They had no problems with how the loans were processed or the documentation Trump provided. There is no actual evidence that he got better rates due to any assertions he made on his loan documents. That is all from the fantasy world of Letitia James and the judge. So gloat while you can because the judge "found" that Trump got better rates, but prepare for the time when you have to admit that wasn't the case.

So you believe Trump DID get better rates? Just want this on the record.

Trump didn't get any "better rates" for anything. WTF are you talking about?

You're not too bright, are you? Much of LeBitchia James' case is based on the tax valuations of Trump properties. NO ONE actually thinks Jon Stewart should be prosecuted/indicted. We are just joking about it due to the hypocrisy because NEITHER Trump or Stewart should be prosecuted.

Good to know you're as ignorant on this case as @The Real timschochet, who had to admit his ignorance when he tried to claim this was about taxes. Good job.

When is Letitia James indicting Jon Stewart? https://nypost.com/2024/03/27/real-estate/jon-stewart-found-to-have-overvalued-his-nyc-home-by-829/

First a cop gets murdered. Now a thread gets murdered. What is this world coming to?

Google Howard Kieffer lawyer, and that's Worms.

I've never run for President and had to deal with a coordinated legal effort trying to prevent me from doing so. Have you? Doesn't change the fact that an indictment doesn't mean sh*t. Good to see the lawfare is having it's intended effect on you though, "Counselor."

"Lawyer" who doesn't know that an indictment isn't worth the paper it's written on, that one of our main legal principles is innocent until proven guilty. Such a fake lawyer.

REDDIT generates revenue. It has never been profitable: https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/23/tech/reddit-ipo-filing-business-plan/index.html

Happens all the time Tim. You work in real estate. One would think you'd have an understanding of how business works. Another example. REDDIT. Has been around a lot longer than Trump's site. People valued it pretty highly this week too.

I never thought it couldn't get worse in Oakland. Why are you selling them short?