Strike

I don't believe you. You aren't even honest when I ask you how many times you were suspended over there. Your truth changes with the wind.

Well, you know, depression and mental issues and all that........

I told you SPECIFICALLY how they lied. The following statement from their article is FACTUALLY incorrect: There is no geolocation data. They know this. They acknowledged it over the weekend. And they're probably going to get sued over it.

It's related to a false report by the AP trying to suggest that a candidate named Bernie Moreno had an account on Adult Friend Finder in 2008. Here is a story from a site you like about the issue: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/ohio-senate-race-bernie-moreno-adult-friend-finder-explained.html However, this story is several days old and omits new information, specifically that the AP claimed in TWO separate stories to have confirmed where the account was created using "geolocation data." That statement is factually incorrect and is likely to result in a lawsuit. They published this story a few days before the primary. The Dems are rolling with it but no other media is. Which was the intent. And it's likely to result in a lawsuit. So, given that info, what do you think of the AP's antics?

No, I won't provide you with a link. The only sites reporting the issue accurately are ones you won't believe, and you don't have the intelligence to see through the spin that the AP and other sites are putting on this story. So, you can wallow in your ignorance. Very typical Tim.

@The Real timschochet What do you think about the AP trying to interfere in an election primary by publishing a factually incorrect hit piece on a Trump endorsed candidate just before the primary? Seems kind of shady don't you think? Not something a reputable news organization would do.

It's what squiz uses to arrange his homo dates.

Says the guy who follows people around and posts quotes of theirs without context YEARS later to try to pull a "gotcha" on them.

Guess what none of those words have in common? None are PROPER nouns.

Those aren't proper names. You're such a little weasel. But hey, you keep pushing your credibility further and further in the mud. Good for you, I guess.

Dude, you don't typo a proper name. Nor does spell check change "trayvon" to "trevon." Just admit it. You focked up. And SAY HIS NAME!!!!!!

That was not a typo you lying POS. Nice try though

Like you give a sh*t. And for the record, his name is spelled Trayvon Martin. If you're gonna virtue signal like you care, at least spell his name correctly. SAY HIS NAME SQUIZZY!!!!!

Libs didn't care when Biden was calling for VIOLENCE!!!! https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/07/bernie-sanders-attacks-joe-biden-mini-super-tuesday

Dude, at a certain point you just have to ignore him. He says he provides "evidence" but all he provides are talking points. He's like @The Real timschochet. We provide ACTUAL, INDISPUTABLE evidence and he says "see they ignore my evidence talking points."

This is as far as I had to go. If you missed it then yes you missed it but Biden knowingly took classified documents. And that's illegal. The report even said so. It just said he was too old and feeble to prosecute which, the last time I looked, were NOT valid reasons not to prosecute someone. I'm sorry you're so misinformed.

Yep but we can't control pigeon boy.

No, Trump didn't do the exact same thing as Biden. Biden did WORSE, as Jon explained above. So, why is Trump being prosecuted when Biden (I'm not bringing Hitlery in to this for simplicity) committed a far worse offense? So, either you dispute the FACT that Biden illegally took classified docs as a Senator, or you should be able to explain why he's not being prosecuted other than it being a political witch hunt. THAT is what I expect you to respond to.

I was at FBG's and can confirm that jonmx was jonmx over there too. And you haven't responded to my post. I guess you don't have a good answer. That's what happens when presented with FACTS.

Wait, wut? Biden had classified documents from his time as Senator. A Senator can only view classified documents in a SCIF and is prohibited from removing them from that SCIF. Are you disputing these FACTS? Be careful how you answer. Your credibility is already on thin ice. Don't completely destroy it due to your partisan leanings.

Well, you can go research it if you'd like. Or you can be ignorant like @The Real timschochet

This isn't about McDonalds. As I said, research the issue. It's about "right to repair" and a lot of large corporations are caught up in it. This is one area where I'm ok with the government getting involved. It's laws they passed that allow this issue to exist in the first place.

Yes clearly McDonalds is poorly run. Barely anyone has even heard of them.

I rarely support government actions but in this case they are right. You should read up on the issue and other right to repair issues. Companies are taking advantage of the law as written.

Tim, I don't think you even googled it yourself before posting this. Because I just did and the evidence doesn't support your assertions. Did you think we wouldn't call your bluff?