Strike

Not surprised but no need to post about your fetishes here.

So, more questionable "doctorate degree": This guy or Jill Biden?

Link to him being married to a U.S. citizen?

On his application to get licensed in Iowa, under penalty of perjury, he asserted he was a U.S. citizen. That is clearly false. Yet you continue to support such a morally questionable individual being in charge of the education of a large number of our youth

I don't know. That"s what the Iowa school district said. Ask them. It sounds like they're not sure since they aren't saying the docs he presented ARE Legit.

WTF are you talking about?

The Iowa people's story is that he presented documents that appeared legit for his I-9 form. Why wouldn't he have done similarly at previous jobs? The variety of crimes this individual seems willing and to have committed is quite varied, yet you continue to support him and don't seem to have an issue with such a morally questionable person being in charge of the education of large numbers of our youth.

He's looked good to me so far.

I think he brings up Occam's Razor because it's been used properly to debunk many of the fantasies he posts here. I also think he doesn't know WTF Occam's Razor means because most of the times he brings it up it isn't applicable, as is the case here.

Send them to El Salvador

They should just send in Kyle Rittenhouse with an AK. Problem solved

The only source I'm seeing giving out the additional information you're saying you read from "primary sources" is the DMPS, who might be biased. Link to your "primary sources?". Or is there a reason you haven't already provided it?

Right, so every time you suggest he isnt going after the worst of the worst you're lying.

Of course they'll go after criminals first. Just like any law enforcement operation those are the most dangerous. They're also usually a smaller percentage of the whole. Using the fact that the sheer numbers are more run of the mill illegals to suggest that means they're not focusing on the criminals is lazy at best and biased hackery at worst.

Bump for @TimHauck. Guess his 10 hours of searching didn't yield any quote where Trump specified how many run of the mill illegals versus bad hombres he'd be deporting.

Nope, not at all

Fact.

And he has been. If you'd pay attention DHS posts bio's of some of the "worst" guys they catch pretty much every day. Your MSM doesn't cover that though so you think they're just picking up day laborers at Home Depot. But he NEVER said he wouldn't deport run of the mill illegals. And that's your problem. But that's on you, not Trump.

You'd be wrong, but that's nothing new. And you're the only one looking like an idiot, defending an illegal with a final order of deportation and a prior weapons charge who ran from law enforcement and was found with an illegal weapon. Talk about looking like a fool.

No, you changed the question you were answering, and ignored one of the parameters that was part of the question. Not to mention that most respectable people don't carry LOADED guns in their cars so you changed the parameters of one of the parameters you were addressing. Essentially, you bastardized the question in hopes of one of your gotchas. Swing and a miss. AGAIN.

Certainly none to anyone on this bored named Tim.

He's not legally allowed to have a gun.

I didn't ignore your post, and you didn't achieve what you claim to have anyways. You just made yourself look like a bigger baby than your hero little Billy from the gaming chat room.

Do you know how juvenile you look sometimes?

El Salvador!!!!