Strike

Bumping this so you can't edit it and pretend you didn't say it.

And for EVERYONE who reads this forum, here is WHY I don't take anything people like SID, @The Real timschochet, Squissy, or Hackboy say at face value. If you read SID's posts to me in this thread it sounds compelling. BUT, you HAVE to read the source material. From page 6 of the order SID is relying on to suggest that the illegal can't be deported ANYWHERE: So the "Witholding of removal" means specifically to a single country, in this case El Salvador. Apparently SID read this ENTIRE document EXCEPT the one sentence that blows his whole narrative up. Or he's full of sh*t. I'll let you decide. But don't accept anything these MF'ers post at face value.

No. You're wrong. AGAIN.

I asked you to tell me where so I could read it for myself. If you don't want to tell me where then I'll just put you up there with Artest as someone who needs to interpret things for me instead of giving me the source so I can interpret it for myself intelligently and call it a day.

I'm not reading that whole thing. If that order says "release him" tell me where and I'll go read that section of it. AFAIK the order said he was at risk of being harmed/murdered by a gang so don't deport him to El Salvador. It didn't say they couldn't deport him elsewhere.

It's not semantics. If Trump violated the ruling he could be held in contempt, just like Biden and Obummer's administration's were during their terms, but that hasn't even been floated. Words have meaning, especially when it comes to law. Just because you liberals want to interpret everything instead of taking words at face value doesn't change the meaning of those words and sentences. Just like when you said that the courts found he was MS-13 but that the evidence was lacking. If the evidence was "lacking" they wouldn't have found him to be MS-13. ROFLMAO.

I'll take this as your admission of defeat. Good job 10x banned alias!!!

I don't see the United States mentioned once in that quote or the word returned. So again, your own article proved my point and proved that you have no idea what the word fact means.

You're quoting the article and not the Supreme Court. Why won't you posted the ACTUAL SC ruling? The quote from the ruling is right in your article. Banned alias being disingenuous. Not surprising.

https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/sweden-immigrants-crisis/

Bump.

ROFLMAO. Your own article proves my point. Reread it.

No, you're not. And the SC did not rule that he should be returned. So, your "facts" are wrong. How many times have you been banned now? And why is it a personal attack to bring up the fact that you were banned? That's not an attack. That's a FACT. Now you're opposed to FACTS? Make up your mind.

Banned alias making a bunch of excuses for a wife beating illegal alien gang banger. Gee, I wonder why you've been banned 10+ times?

Our judicial system ruled he WAS MS-13. What you "think" doesn't matter legally. Now you're opposed to the rule of law? Until the judicial system rules he is not MS-13 he should be considered MS-13. It's funny because no one has even filed a motion with the courts to overturn that finding. But as a rule of law, he was found to be MS-13.

How can he roll back something the alphabet people don't even have @squistion?

ROFLMAO. Tim did a google search and found out he was wrong, and now is starting the backtracking.

I live in Denver

If you were being sarcastic, it wasn't obvious. It's not us who need to make an adjustment here......

Even if you were told this, is it your position that you want the government rounding up the alphabet people?

Why did you feel the need to put the word "here" in to that sentence?

@The Real timschochet loves to prove how ignorant he is on a daily basis. And what's most ironic is there seems to be a correlation between how ignorant he is on a topic and how strongly his (wrong) opinions are on that topic.

Here you go Tim. This is from 2022: https://wits.worldbank.org/tariff/trains/en/country/CAN/partner/USA/product/all

I would be ok with this if I didn't know that these people wouldn't just come right back once the environment is more favorable to illegals. But in a few years that may be exactly the case, and we would have just given away a boatload of money for a temporary reprieve.

They did not release him "per a judge's order" in 2019. The order only said they couldn't deport him to El Salvador. It did not mandate his release. They chose to release him, as administration's have done with millions of illegals for various reasons over time. But the release was not per a judge's order. The judge did not say they had to release him. Why do you constantly LIE? You're as bad as @The Real timschochet.