Strike

So today is the day @TimHauck found out chicks look better with makeup

WTF are you talking about collateral damage in a war zone? The kid was sitting in an open air cafe when he was blown up. Your justification of such a killing tells me all I need to know about you.

1) Show proof he was in a terrorist group. The U.S. has laws related to citizens who join terrorist groups. We bust people all the time when they're about to board a flight to go fight with terrorists. We have warrants and indictments to do so. There was no indictment on Al-Alwaki, or warrant. We literally blew up a U.S. citizen because we felt like it. 2) Then, a couple of weeks later, we blew up his 16 year old son who had no known links to terrorism. Let's hear you justify that one.

it's not relevant that it was a different attack, or that he wasn't the target. That was 100 times worse than what happened to this illegal alien, human trafficking, wife beater. As someone has pointed out repeatedly, the hills you libs choose to die on is baffling.

Official police reports and restraining order filings? None that I know of but I'm open to being edumucsted if your whataboutism is so inclined. However, no one is trying to deport Trump so it's not really relevant to this thread.

1) Al-Alwaki was an American citizen. You can look through the threads about this is incident on this forum and you will see that I strongly denounced his death. IIRC there wasn't even an indictment against him for any crime when he was killed. How can you kill an American citizen without even an indictment? That was murder. Here we're simply talking about deportation. 2). Al-Alwaki had a 16 year old son, also bombed in to oblivion by Obama. There wasn't even a suggestion that he was a terrorist. Also an American citizen. You gonna justify that one too? 3). Garcia got due process He had a valid deportation order at the time he was deported.

It's like you didn't even bother to read the quote he posted where someone literally suggested we should invade to get this guy.

He had not one, but two reports of DV a year or two apart The odds of both of them being lies is basically zero, yet people defend him anyways. I guess it's not too surprising. Some of those people also defend Roman Polanski

Thank your boy Newsom for that.

I guess we can put that mantra of yours that you admit that you're wrong to bed can't we?

I bolded the relevant part. I guess we can put that mantra of yours that you admit when you're wrong to bed can't we?

It's not legally disputed. TWO courts ruled he was.

I stopped fearing death once I saw how much of a p**** he was in the Bill and Ted movies.

No,, I don't. I see that you're quitting on your assertion that the 6 foot rule was based on science. Smart move.

Nope: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/06/02/six-foot-rule-covid-no-science/

I don't know anyone who believes that. I, personally, believe it was an ACCIDENTAL lab leak. But it was from research that wasn't being properly done. The lab was not up to the standards for this type of research. But because of the LIES about the origin the world didn't force China to come clean which resulted in two things: 1) We haven't done squat to ensure this doesn't happen again. Bookmark this post for when something eerily similar happens again. Because I will absolutely be all "I told you so" to anyone here still alive. 2) China has not been held accountable. And Fauci and others who helped fund it. And they should be. Because there is no INCENTIVE for them NOT to do it again unless there is some type of accountability.

There were absolutely lies. Fauci admitted the 6 foot rule was created out of thin air. But it became policy. Is it your assertion that the 6 foot rule was not a lie when we were told it was based on science?

I wish you had been this concerned when we were paying millions to house illegals in five-star hotels.

Your comment was about why an immigration enforcement action carried out by ICE and other Federal Agencies focused on illegals and not domestic criminals. Don't try to move the goalposts now.

Yeah, I wonder why ICE would focus on illegals. Damn now I'm gonna be wondering about that all day!!!!

Your problem is believing prejudice only exists in one direction. Couple of hot takes for you. Prejudice will ALWAYS exist. If you can't see that by now you never will. And prejudice exists against EVERYONE for one reason or another. But you focus on the prejudice against black people and call it racism!!!! All the while you ignore the prejudice against other groups, and you ascribe what in some cases are legit actions as racism because a black person is involved.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/nvidia-says-working-with-partners-make-ai-supercomputers-us-2025-04-14/ https://www.investopedia.com/novartis-plans-usd23b-investment-in-us-facilities-as-trump-threatens-pharma-tariffs-11713217

Squissy getting his "news" from Twitter again I see

No, they're still on this one. They're just ignoring all the indications that this guy is scum and not worth going to bat for. See all of Hackboys post only focusing on some corrupt cop but ignoring all the other data on this POS.

Yes, and Biden's FBI told them to let him go. See, it makes them more sympathetic when you ignore much of their crime.