Strike

When configuring ignoring someone, you get options for WHAT you want to ignore of theirs, and one of those options is to ignore mentions. This should prevent you from being notified when someone tags you so you don't have to ignore EVERYTHING from that person but for those people who are serial taggers you can ignore them tagging you.

They also won both the house and the senate. Tim is just trying to prove how much of an idiot and/or troll he is. Regardless, he's not a serious poster.

Some of the jerky they sell over there is made from dogs so if you are a person who likes beef jerky make sure what you're buying over there. And I'm not joking.

Not sure what you mean here. You can uncheck any that you want so you can choose to only ignore some things. In this case, I'm calling out the ability to JUST check the box labeled "mentions" which should prevent you from being notified when someone tags you in a post. Some of us get frequently tagged for no constructive purpose; simply to annoy us. This allows us to prevent that.

I know you're disappointed that he didn't die by Sharon leaving him in a car in the hot sun with the windows rolled up so you could start a PSA thread about it.........

Blizzard, but I haven't listened to the full albums of much of the Sabbath stuff.

Blizzard of Oz is one of the top 5 albums in Rock history. RIP to one of the greatest.

To be fair it can be both. But the fact that he's making these videos and getting paid for them due to people like hackboy watching them just shows that it's more about making money than it is getting people to put their carts away.

I haven't watched it but I'm comfortable saying no. That's part of the problem with these shows - they've stopped trying to entertain and now are simply vehicles for propaganda and Trump/Conservative bashing.

Colbert acknowledges that his show was losing $40 million a year but is "confused" as to why his show was canceled. What a retard!!!

I didn't either so I looked it up. He played the VP of the Grim Reapers, the black MC from the final season: https://sonsofanarchy.fandom.com/wiki/Sticky

My partner team owner and I grabbed him but not because of FFToday. My partner called it. Not sure what he based that on but he didn't and still doesn't use sites like this.

That's what happens when you disappear for 6 months. Welcome back focker

It addresses the specific questions you asked, and is not from the government so it's not government PR. I guess I'll add you to the list of not serious posters

@Herbivore The following LOS ANGELES TIMES article has nothing to do with ICE: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-07-14/pot-farm-raided-by-immigrant-agents-has-open-child-labor-complaint-state-says

Which part? It was national news

So, on the heels of SB 549 getting delayed, we now have SB 79. These people have no shame.

MIGA!!!

Yeah I pulled the years number out of the air. I'd rather underestimate the number of years than overestimate it so Tim can't pull his semantic b*******. The point remains the same.

Because other leagues are profitable. The WNBA wouldn't exist if it hadn't been subsidized by the NBA for the last 15 years. Now that it might make a profit next year they should get a lot of that profit? How about they repay all the money that they've lost over the last 15 years and then we talk about giving them a significant amount of the profit?

They're still holding hostages. GTFOH.

They don't currently. No other sports union does so. I think it's a reasonable assumption. If you have evidence to the contrary I'm willing to see it. Don't make this one of your hills to die on though.

Then the players should negotiate on the profit number, not the revenue number. And if the WNBA doesn't turn a profit they don't get paid. Or, to be legal, they get minimum wage. Seems fair to me.

What's interesting about it. Do you understand the difference between the words revenue and profit?