Strike

I have nothing against the girl but fock no. I'm over 18.

Don't worry honey. @t.j. booker is available.

Well, someone needs to remind them that father time is undefeated.

What am I missing? This story says Canada won: https://www.espn.com/olympics/hockey/story/_/id/43892724/canada-beats-finland-earn-rematch-us-finals

That was a great game. USA playing tonight against Sweden. We've already punched our ticket to the final game so wonder if the game will be worth watching. Do they rest players in Hockey?

First of all, you lose immediately when you invoke school rules. Schools do not have all the constitutional protections Americans enjoy in their everyday lives. But yes, for the most part people should be able to wear what they want anytime and anywhere. It may not be the smartest thing to do but that's their choice. Just because a person CAN do something doesn't mean they SHOULD. That is a concept too many people in this country don't adhere to and is one of the main reasons this country is failing. Rights come with responsibility, and too many people fail on the responsibility side of that equation. But we don't remove the right just because some people don't use it responsibly.

Come on. This is they guy who repeats constantly that it's ok to break the laws HE DISAGREES WITH. That's not a serious poster.

Anyone who thinks it's ok to ban symbols because symbols "cause violence" is either a simpleton or a retard. I'll let you take your pick.

We need to ban "non violent" protests too then. That's the price you sometimes have to pay to protect a "free" society.

Symbol's don't "cause" violence to occur, simpleton.

I'll pass. You're not worth it. Just keep your head in the sand.

Plenty has been accomplished but you keep your head in the sand like always.

Yup. I'll just use my gun to cut my bread.

What's sad is that, after 50 years, their very first episode where they were still figuring sh*t out will be 10X funnier than the episode they spared no expense on to highlight the 50 year anniversary.

I just saw a TV commercial for Ontario, Canada, specifically talking about how great a trading partner it has been, how many jobs it's generated in the U.S., and how long they've been a partner and the hope it continues long in to the future. I don't think I've ever seen a commercial like that before. Coincidence? I think not.

Be definition you are NOT accepting the science. One of the main tenets of science is that it is NEVER written in stone. It is always up for reevaluation based upon new observations, experiments, and data. Otherwise, the concept of more than a binary choice between male and female wouldn't ever have been accepted by scientists. The FACT that you refuse to educate yourself when given the ability to do so shows that you are actually anti-science, not accepting of it. And saying you believe political lobbying organizations makes something scientific fact just makes you a fool on top of it.

If neither one of us gets a say on this subject then neither one of us should be posting in this thread. But I reject that notion on it's face so I won't follow that. But If you truly believe that anyone who isn't a psychiatrist shouldn't be talking about this subject I'll expect you to exit the thread post haste. I bet that doesn't happen though

The guy who refuses to read multiple articles handed to him should not be the one suggesting the person who GAVE them those articles isn't educated. But you are a retard so there's that.

ROFLMAO. Such a pathetic, ignorant person.

You're wrong as usual. First of all, I didn't "find" anything. Secondly, it's not just a few. Thirdly, these are highly respected scientists who used to have high level positions in the organizations that you cite. They just happened to have the ethics to step down from their posts when the organizations stopped following scientific protocols and ethics. Calling them wackos makes you look like a retard. Fourth, how about responding to the data and arguments being made by RESPECTED SCIENTISTS instead of repeating talking points? Lastly, you didn't answer my question. Did you even read the articles?

Idiotic. I bet you didn't even read the links. Calling a group of well respected scientists in the field of biology wackos just makes you look stupid, especially after you conceded that you are woefully unqualified to comment on biology or scientific matters. Linked in one of the articles I already linked to is the following, which was a fascinating if very long read: https://richarddawkins.substack.com/p/is-the-male-female-divide-a-social Many of us have been arguing that sex is defined by chromosomes but the article above very clearly explains why that is not so and what biologists UNIVERSALLY do use to determine sex, across ALL species. Here is a link to a University textbook supporting this definition of sex: https://open.lib.umn.edu/evolutionbiology/chapter/7-4-sex-its-about-the-gametes-2/

Unlike @The Real timschochet, as much as possible I support my assertions with data. To his proclamation that there is broad consensus in the scientific community, the experts as opposed to us "laymen", here is proof that is not the case: https://www.thecollegefix.com/leading-scientists-spar-about-trump-order-stating-sex-is-binary/ https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2025/02/13/a-group-letter-to-the-presidents-of-three-evolution-ecology-societies-objecting-to-their-characterization-of-sex-as-a-spectrum-in-humans-and-all-other-species/

This is really a Babylon Bee article, right Jerry?

Except you during the housing/loan meltdown around 2006.

There is no such thing as an "undocumented" person. That is disgusting and xenophobic to say. There are, however, people in this country ILLEGALLY, AKA illegal aliens. And those people aren't persecuted. They are dealt with according to our laws. I guess you think the pedos that were caught crossing the border this week are simply persecuted undocumented people. What a disgusting person you are.