Strike

"ChatGPT, generate a mock draft for my ESPN league "

Yep. They've been going downhill ever since the guy who started the airline died. They're getting rid of everything that made them unique. It's a bold strategy Cotton. Let's see how it works out.....

Let me guess - your cousin is "Bush of knowledge."

Pffft. Up all night working.

What's interesting to me is that I actually liked him when he had a show on comedy Central after The daily show.

Don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!!!

Nope. You literally accused me of committing fraud. You don't get to try to try to sidestep that with semantics. You could just apologize. What's idiotic is trying to define how much an asset appreciates. That's not defined at all. That's why people try to buy stocks that will increase in value as quickly and as much as possible. There is no one formula for that. But that's a different discussion than the FACT that you accused me of committing fraud.

Well, you're on the record saying that *I* committed fraud when I sold my house. If you think people who committed fraud should be prosecuted, it stands to reason that you think *I* should be prosecuted. If the penalty for that fraud is jail/prison, it stands to reason that you think *I* should do jail/prison time. That's just logic based on your posts. So when you say you didn't want me thrown in jail, I have to roll my eyes a little bit.

This entire tangent is stupid, as I show in the next post after you posted this.

Funny how the NBC link actually has an Israeli response while your previous links, which I questioned, said they hadn't heard back. Maybe now you'll see why I question sources I don't consider credible. You might also take note of my statement where I said you won't see me posting links that most wouldn't consider credible. I do that to avoid these prolonged discussions. If I can't find a link I think YOU will find credible, I don't bother posting the story. You might consider that approach going forward. From your NBC article: I know you won't believe them, and that's your right. I'm not even saying they're being honest but there is no proof that they're not. So, I'll refer you to my previous post: And ask, how was this story supposed to sway me? It's totally consistent with what I posted above.

You didn't answer my questions.

Ok, then we're done. Which is exactly what you should have said to the other guy when you didn't like his response instead of just bumping the same post 20 times. See how that works?

Answer my questions. Don't just keep throwing random links out.

It's a yes or no question. Why won't you answer it?

I have no knowledge of mer-c.org or this doctor either. If this is such a huge deal, why can't you find an article closer to home from an organization we would both consider credible? You'll notice that when I post articles they're never from whack job sites none of us have ever heard of. I have to ask - WHEN did you find out about an Indonesian medical group/website?

So you don't think people who commit fraud should be prosecuted?

This is the CEO of the "news" organization you're whining about defunding: https://x.com/Eric_Schmitt/status/1945894657054986363?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

No. I've told you before I barely use twitter, if at all. I certainly don't use it as a news source. You and squissy share that distinction.

So your complaint about my recollection of our discussion about journalists isn't that you bounced all over the place on the number of journalists, which you acknowledge doing in the quote above, but the fact that I said it was 200 first and one later instead of one first and 200 later? Are you focking kidding me?

It's pathetic.

I'm just gonna have to make some macros since you just like to regurgitate the same discussions OVER and OVER:

FFS we weren't talking about the group in Syria. You love to intertwine separate discussions and use that for gotchas. GTFOH. You are not a serious poster. I should have taken you at your word this morning when you admitted all you are doing nowadays is trolling.

middleeasteye.net????

We went through the journalist thing in a very detailed manner. You were not able to support your assertion that multiple had been killed, and certainly didn't have evidence that there was any targeting of journalists. You kept changing the number - First it was 200, then it was 3, and finally it was maybe 1. So just stop it with the journalists. I have never said it was anyone's goal to "protect innocent lives." Israel's goal is to protect Israel and Israeli lives. In doing so, they are not specifically targeting innocent people but do their best to avoid the loss of life of innocent people. But they, like Jerry and myself, understand that in WAR sometimes innocent life gets lost. You are taking a childish, utopian view that you can wage WAR and not have one innocent life lost. That's certainly possible but I'm not sure it's ever happened in significant armed combat. It's like you want WAR to look like a movie called "Logans Run" where when people turned 35 years old IIRC they would just walk in to a human disintegrating machine and let themselves be killed because that's how that society facilitated population control. In real world WAR, people don't just let themselves be killed so loss of innocent life can be avoided.

I'm surprised @RLLD needs this explained to him. He was the expert on all things housing back in 2006, especially FRAUD. I'm pretty sure he wanted me thrown in jail and I only owned one home.