artista928

You'd be surprised. I watch a lot of lawyers who do commentary on trials of interest who are in pràctice themselves & have all warned us that it could happen. Those of us who watched the 1st trial gavel to gavel thought no way, yet 3 or 4 jurors thought he was there, she was there & drunk & nothing else mattered. Remember Arcca was in the last trial with their data & science...

Dui, Dwi. I don't know Btw, I watched this stream who had an excellent panel of lawyers that us lawtuber fans know well including one in MA shed light on stuff I didn't know or realize. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zw9pb8Bdv6g&t=9285s

So to give a way out for the cw, Karen asked for the stand alone oui/dwi to be on the jury form. She may have been spooked from rumors of the 3 or 4 hold out jurors from pt 1. That juror who gave interviews had said they we like he's dead, she was there & the alternate juror who became part of the defense team may have suggested it too. In MA it carries up to 2 years in jail. Some say she won't go to jail, but we hav Bev..

A MA defense attorney said that there, the judges appoints the foreperson. But this is the only time he knows of that it was appointed first, before the alternates are selected lotto #s style.. So, did she want to make sure this 50 something yo guy who took no notes....a plant?

Alessi's wife filmed Alessi talking about Karen Read at a dinner. We can see Karen's mom too. https://x.com/alessinator/status/1934078144467570850?t=YUuJn9pd-gCdhcje62Ne7A&s=07

Some think jury reached a verdict but are taking the weekend to make sure no one changes their mind.. See you all Monday!

Love Rob of Law & Lumber & with Ian Runkle who comes in as a guest every Friday. Both lawyers. Ian's channel is Runkle Of The Bailey. Long stream on closings tonight but nicely timed stamped. Great picking things out & explaining. Jackson starts 49 min in.

Watch full closing arguments, both sides, here. Witness the masterful Jackson vs reachinggggg Brennon Science data vs personal nararatves, opinions & paint by numbers.... Hanky is using character assassination by emphasising her drinking & driving using her clips.He's speaking to the hold outs because facts are not on his side. In the 1st trial, no KR clips. The hold outs were those honed in the drinking & driving. This is all cw has..

That was brought up & pretty sure addressed. Can't remember the details but no lawyers I watch breaking down this trial for us raised a flag on this. The defense this time around have been as perfect as one can be. They learned from pt 1 & smashed cw. I'm not even going to bother listening to Brennan again It was revealed last night on The Defense Diaries yt channel (the husband is an attorney) who had Mark Bederow on that the reason why no rebuttal by cw is because cw withheld the xray of the arm. Alessi blew that open so they had to abandon bringing Welcher & an ME back because oops. Brennan could get himself disbared by withholding critical evidence that showed no way 6000 lb suv going at any speed would do 0. Alessi found it.

Listening to AJ's closing again. Wow. More wow from what I missed the first time through. Brilliant! Attorneys chiming in are saying they have never heard a better closing in their lives. Alessi the master even got a cw witness to conclude: reasonable doubt... Lololol at CW..

Also it wasn't let in because it might prejudice the jury. But "the agency" & other investigations words were used & it seems...the jury are smart peeps according to observations from the courtroom, like when they were engaged & went they were dialed out..

Corruption

Shouĺd they go over the weekend, jurors have a paper copy of the instructions.

They are back in the courtroom... let's go!

Èxactly. Another person who was inside said jurors looked disgusted with Bev with all obvious bias for the cw. She said this younger jury are not looking like they buy Spanky what he is selling. Last year it was raining on verdict day, today it's sunny with a rainbow sighting!

I can't wait to hear juror interviews...hopefully someone talks

People on the ground says verdict back today...

Jurors are on the young side so shouldn't be memory issues...

All they need is just 1 fact to show reasonable doubt. Pick one of 100 jurors! Police corruption & sloppy investigation beyond belief...wow! Arrcaa isn't reliable. I just can't. Opinions matter not data?? You know this will be made into a movie. Proctor was already fired. Aperture boys are next. Reading Aiden's observations gives much hope but it takes 1 idiot not to get science... PS..Wtf with all these pop up as on this site?? Maddening!

Spanky should have passed on closing just like he did on rebutal....

Oh Spanky, give it up. This is crìnge & laughable already.

@Drturtleboy, Aiden Kearney, is inside. He's tweeting. Check it out for what we aren't seeing. Here's one tweet: "Camera man isn't showing it, but every time Alan Jackson adds more reasonable doubt it goes up on the "reasonable doubt" big board graphic they have that the jurors can see. An amazing presentation thus far."

In MA, defense goes first, cw last. That's it. No rebutals

Alan Jackson's closing is the greatest story telling of how idiotic the cw wealth was to try the case not once but twice! He's the perfect guy for this. He's shredding the cw. Action Jackson! It's been reported the jury has been riveted with AJ & zzz with Spanky. I love it! CW is next. In MA there is no rebuttal so that will be it. Not sure I can stomach Spanky coming up. This better not be a hung jury again. The defense has done soooo much better this time by focusing on data & science & not on the police corruption like last time. Hope you are doing well too! ESS ENN

Alessi up now handing Bev her ass. If you watch nothing else today, a short day, watch Alessi especially with your favourite lawyer commentary channel tonight. 🫠