nobody

Weed reclassified to Schedule 3. I don't smoke weed, but this is so obvious, I can't believe it took this long to get it done.

So pretty much just like 80% or so of people

Preach. Glad to see people recognize a race hustle when they see it. Too bad it only seems to be recognizable one way.

Some consulting firm clearly told Newsom that Trump-like antics will play well with voters. The problem here is that this is so obviously produced it comes off cringy. Trump says some goofy sh¡t but at least he's being his authentic self and not what some consulting firm told him to be.

Dang. Looks like he got Clintonized!?!?!

Now you know it's time to buy because I promise you the market manipulators are planting fear for their inevitable entrance back into the market.

So what's the grift here? They ring up a bogus food stamp charging the snap card like $150. They give the customer $100 in cash and then get reimbursed for the $150 from snap program? Not a bad scam. Wait, if the people doing this aren't buying food, how are they feeding their starving kids that the wokies here assured me would be going hungry if food stamps were cut off?

He's just race hustling from the other side.

Obama never struck me as dumb. And I don't know who the best fher one is. And yeah, you don't need to be all that smart to graduate from Harvard. You used to need to be smart to get in, but once you're in, it's more about networking (grifters will excel here).

Authorities also allege the defendants sold MannaPack meals, a donated food product intended for food-insecure children overseas, for about $8 per package. These meals are funded entirely by charitable donations and are not authorized for retail sale. “These products are not for sale anywhere. Yet Bonheur and Alisme were selling them in their stores for nearly $10 a pack, profiting from food literally intended for starving children in disaster zones,” Foley said.

He likely was referring to those particular black women, but let me help you out since I know people like you who are inherently racist struggle identifying what's actually racist and what isn't. The argument that people should be chosen on merit is a righteous and not racist at all. Calling a singular black person (or 4 black people) dumb isn't racist because individuals can be judged... Individually. That's the whole point. What makes Kirk's statement racist, though, is that if you are saying that someone should be hired based on merit, then saying the spot was stolen from a white person implies that by definition white people have more merit which is, in fact, racist. If he said she stole the position from someone more deserving = not racist Assuming this hypothetical person that is more deserving is white = racist Now he likely would argue that in the context of the discussion, affirmative action by definition is taking a spot from a presumably white person and giving it to a person from an underrepresented group, so in the context of a discussion around affirmative action assuming the "stolen" spot would've gone to a white person is appropriate. But if you're keen on painting him a racist (I don't know enough to say for sure he was or wasn't), that's an easier track then couching his characterization of the likes of joy reid and Sheila jackson Lee as stupid when they so clearly are. I mean stupid in the sense of making policy, logical thinking, etc. clearly they are gifted at grifting.

Preach

Respect the hustle.

He doesn't realize that those two towns, Bakersfield and Merced, are pit stains and this train is a boondoggle. He doesn't know anything about it, clearly, but it's shiny and sounds cool, so typical lefty is going to have an opinion on it. They just keep having opinions. Now in typical internet fashion from both sides, he's going to go look for articles that defend the train, so he can find ways to be right after forming an ill informed opinion instead of just getting it right.

That thing is wasteful and unnecessary. We can't do it because it's California and we suck. Everyone has their hand out on a project like this.

Trust aside, I probably would have to invest in spaceX if it ever became public. I couldn't pass on a company with the potential to put cellphones out of business. That's too lucrative to pass up. And I know, satellites don't work indoors, but that's why you have ground stations to convert it to voip or solve it with an antenna and repeater. Problem is there really is no reason for him to take it public since they can raise unlimited amounts of money and spaceX is already valued at 800 billion.

I was being facetious. I don't trust Musk, but looking at TSLA as a car company and looking at earnings is incorrect in my opinion. TSLA is a spec play on robots and robo-taxies.

Musk... This dude is going to make me invest in TSLA. He has companies and a skill set uniquely suited to accomplish something extremely profitable if he can pull it off... DATA CENTERS IN SPACE!?!?!!!

They wouldn't kill. They would say they don't agree with violence and then spend all of their energy denying, deflecting, and distracting from it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Scott_Lee Unless you got powaaah! guy played Bruce Lee in the Bruce Lee story.

I wonder where the "unless you got power" guy is these days.

Dems probably wanted subsidies for ever and ever and ever. They probably had them expire just so the CBO numbers wouldn't look crazy. Cooked the books essentially to get it passed. Pretty nefarious actually. Hide the true cost knowing it wasn't economically feasible Get people hooked on it so politicians and would feel compelled to keep extending them. If the system can't survive without subsidies, it should've never been passed.

Trump installing someone he thinks will do his bidding as fed chair. If things go as Trump expects, he'll have rates as low as he can get them. We'll have to see if this dude is willing to stand up to the oval.

It's definitely lost it's luster thanks to openAI spending like drunken sailors and casting doubt on the industry's ability to realize all this ROI. That plus this rotation into industrials that are supposed to do well is crushing tech, but it'll come back around. Cheap money brings speculation.

Surprised Bitcoin still battling 90ish k. Although I guess tech is slumping too.