nobody

Cool. Glad you're a fan of my work.

So every 5th Gen fighter is as maneuverable as an F16?

Dynasty though... egbuka Redraft, I'm not high on any receiver. Although no one seems to be talking about Kyle Williams in New England. People won't catch on to him until late August I bet.

My point was that the f-22 has superior targeting in that it can target enemies further off-boresight. That's the superior sensor. I was specifically talking about. This is also why I didn't want to talk about it. There are puts and takes by the way in any design. The stealth characteristics of fighters often conflict with the dynamics. And again I said 5th Gen in general. You were the one that brought up the f22 specifically. And again my statement holds. These platforms are designed to kill enemies from miles away.

It's more than a hobby for me. I help design some of the sensors on many of these platforms. 5th Gen wins on superior avionics and stealth. F16 whoops an f35 close in. F22 given equal radar and senors maybe 50-50. I guess f-22 wins due to superior targeting sensors. The point is F16s wouldn't get close enough for it to matter. I was talking 5th gens in general, btw

I work with probably a 55 year old purple haired lesbian. One of the biggest grifters we have. Doesn't do a damn thing. Excuse for everything. Threatens to retire every time she has to do work. Her team shìt the bed and she had the gall to say, "we're not going to work extended hours to fix this again." (Second time her team royally focked up and we all jumped in to make sure her team fixed the last one). So I say, "well it's pretty urgent that it gets fixed, and we have folks that usually rise to the occasion.". She got pissed and just made up a peenie-esque lie, "last time a high level person I won't name was in the lab saying, 'fix this or we'll all get fired.'" surprised she didn't say the team messed up because of regional dialects. I'm like, yeah, that shìt never happened, but I had to pretend I was shocked someone would do that and assure it wouldn't happen again.

So essentially page 6 of this thread. Cowherd got 1 thing wrong though. Deion absolutely is a bully. Just see how he treats people that criticized his program. Actually, I don't think he's wrong. I think he's lying. He knows he's a bully. That's why he spent 2 minutes explaining how bullies get lied to when he could have skipped that and jumped straight to superstars get lied to, but I get it. I wouldn't want to criticize deion and bring on his wrath if I were in cowherd's shoes either. But it's another good example of the Deion effect and how it led to the perception that shedeur was more highly rated than he was. Even cowherd is appeasing Deion and the dude has as much clout as anyone in the media.

Ok

This is the Internet. Everyone always sold at the top and bought at the low.

Nah

Don't worry gents

He added such excellent incite copying what he found on Google. At least he credited his source this time.

Nah

The list of JAGs that were high picks that couldn't separate is long and undistinguished. It jumps off the screen to me. Not sure why people keep falling for it. MHJ, Quentin Johnson, N'Keal Harry (the poster boy for this archetype), Corey Davis, Corey Coleman, Laquan Treadwell, etc. MHJ was tied for the worst average separation of any wide receiver with at least 45 targets. That's why he had a disappointing year. NFL teams throw to open receivers. They don't rely on big bodies catching a ball with a DB all over them. This shift has been around ever since they started calling secondary play tighter. As you watch Tet's games, ignore the zone plays. Any decent receiver can be productive running through wide open college zones. Watch the plays against man. The dude can't get away from DBs unless it's on a hitch or a comeback. He ain't becoming more than a JAG on hitches. It's as clear as day.

I think he meant that he's putting Tet in the same tier of quality prospect as Malik/MHJ, so he must think Tet is "generational." That's an unfortunate opinion for his fantasy teams, but, hey, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. It's even the same type of mistake. If Hunter was playing receiver full time, he's clearly the better prospect. And I mean clearly. Head and shoulders better than Tet. It's just murky on how the time share will effect his snap count on offense in my perspective. I mean what if they only play him 70% of the snaps on offense? I happen to think that's best case if he's moonlighting on defense which also brings up his injury risk.