nobody

It's such a misguided take by Rep Crockett. One school invested time, money and effort to ensure they had appropriate accommodations. Why on earth would Anthony have been entitled to use of a different school's property? So If someone is walking down the street, and it starts raining, they can just go in someone's house and then if the owner asks them to leave, knife through the chest? It's just a bizarre argument.

Crockett working overtime race grifting. She must be angling for some kind of Al Sharpton\Jesse Jackson role.

I put in a request for 800 shares spread over two accounts. Figure I might get a 100 shares. I wish they'd open the affirmation window. The price is set, but I guess they're waiting for the market to close today.

Great. So they weren't happy harvesting ballots to keep their power. Now they're using it to push tax increases through.

I'm surprised the Karmelo side couldn't muster up enough support to go rioting. I also found it weird the defense couldn't find anyone willing to say he was a good kid. Was he just that big of a douche even at 17 that even the usual pawns of the race hustlers are like, "nah"?

I'd guess Stephen A is probably 5 IQ points higher than Trump. If I were to guess, I'd say Trump is around 95 and Steven A at about 100.

4x oversubscribed so far.

WHAAAATT?!?!?! if the races were reversed it would've been 3 months of mostly peaceful riots.

She also said that black women live in a state of fear and agony every day that the Metcalf family has never experienced a day in their life.

Retarded take

Actually I just checked in on it. According to the LA Daily News, the initial count where Raman got thousands upon thousands of votes and Pratt got zero was a reporting mistake. "But there was a “lag” in how the vote data was relayed to media outlets. Enough of one that observant election tally watchers caught and captured what appeared to be no ballots for Pratt." One candidate getting 0 mail in votes was the news cycle I was still in. If he did get some reasonable percentage of votes, no issue. It was cool how you thought that would be perfectly normal though due to your made up "mail in voter tendencies"

No. It is a statistical anomaly. That's why it needs to be explained. In fact, that's usually a part of elections. For some reason you guys don't want usual safe guards. I like how we can't even count the votes in less than 2 weeks, but we know the voting habits of mail in voters with absolute certainty two seconds after the votes are counted.

No. My argument is that when 100% of votes or something close to come in for one person and it occurs over thousands and thousands of votes, that's a statistical anomaly that should be explained. And the side argument is that mail in ballots are for convenience and unavoidable conflicts, so they should be able to organize the system such that the votes all get counted expediently.

You thought The Learing Center was on the up and up though too.

I know the big joke is thinking someone would cheat, but that's wrong. If there aren't safeguards in place at every step of the way, it's stupid to think people wouldn't cheat.