nobody

He should just say he won't shut down Ukraine. He'll shut down the war.

Trump is saying he'll give them better weapons.

That might work, but it probably would only be a short term solution. The only return on investment for the US is that Russia knows not to get froggy anymore. That has already been accomplished to an extent, but pulling support for Ukraine signals that the US doesn't hold resolve to see these actions through.

Cutting out the liberal media would be foolish. Trump then becomes a villain. If he wants to bring the liberal media to heel, he should figure out a way to turn some of their talking heads and executives to his side through leverage or just flat out making them sellout for enough money.

Top 10 states to live and work. Alphabetical order is weighted heavily. Lots of red in there. 1. Alabama 2. Alaska 3. Arizona 4. Arkansas 5. California 6. Colorado 7. Connecticut 8. Delaware 9. Florida 10. Georgia

You guys spend a lot of time telling us Ukraine doesn't matter. Now we're supposed to care that Ukrainians are dying? Is the point that not only should the US not be helping Ukraine, but that US help is causing these people to die? Because they were pretty fūcked either way.

Preach... If they would've just hid the fact that it's just a list of states that are less friendly to abortion, it might not have been that obvious.

When I saw the new tag, I was excited for some sweet axeelf drafts. Instead I get the second graders.

Well, it's fun to blame hunter, but let's be real. If they drug tested the entire white house 30% of the staff would pop positive.

I don't have a tribe. The red team thinks I'm on the blue team, and the blue team thinks I'm on the red team. And I was probably the first person to say if the culprit was a white house employee, it's a security risk. Oh and losing a clearance, which this would entail essentially does ruin the person's life since it essentially means they essentially need to change fields.

Iran policy isn't dumb. Even if iran didn't commit suicide by nuke, they would command respect on the national stage that would essentially be a tax on the rest of the world. Iran doesn't even have the delivery systems to reach the US. If they nuked israel, all it would do is guarantee the country would cease to exist. And LOL at protecting Biden because I don't show visceral hatred of him. Some people don't always see everything binary.

This dude thinks Putin is so concerned about gays that he's going to nuke the world out of some moral imperitive. Putin... The guy who murders his political rivals. The guy who authorizes carpet bombing cities with no regard for civilians. Putin is so moral, he'll nuke the world over gays.

I'll add generalizations to things you don't understand. Also I said Iran probably wouldn't use a nuke.

What I'm saying is if it's a staffer and the press gets a hold of that name, the person's life is ruined. You can just fire that person quietly and let them go find some other job. That person is going to become a lightening rod because the red team is going to go apeshìt trying to make this person a proxy for Biden.

I guess I figure if they find the person or it's someone unaffiliated with the white house staff, and you tell the press, you'll have to also report it to the police. Maybe that's the right thing to do, but clearly this administration doesn't mind protecting drug addicts.

If I was in charge and some random staffer was caught with drugs, I'd probably just fire them and claim the investigation yielded no results. You don't have to destroy someone's life over a coke habit. Just fire them and move on.

It's not a deflection. The jan 6th rioters were empowered by the mostly peaceful riots all over the country so they thought nothing would happen to them. They just made the mistake of thinking law and order would be applied evenly. Jan 6th wouldn't have happened if the mostly peaceful riots didn't go on for so long with no repercussions. There's a correlation there that is relevant.

First of all Iran may use a tactical nuke on Israel. They would immediately be wiped off the planet. There is not a guarantee they would. But you know what really is 100% sure they won't use nukes? Not allowing them to have them. So your whole premise is false. There is no guarantee that Iran would use them. As for Biden, he said there was a risk of Russia using nukes. Literally no one disagrees with that. Somehow in your head that equates to Biden saying Russia is going to nuke the US, but the funny part about that whole stance is that supposedly we can't believe anything Biden ever says. He's liar and dumb and weak and can't be trusted, but when he says there exists a risk Russia will use nuclear weapons, all the sudden that gets twisted into Russia is guaranteed to nuke the US and we should treat that as beyond reproach. Look, I get we think this is going to sell more prepper gear from your online store, but let's at least try to have some sort of cogent line of thinking.

It's clear Justin doesn't understand the following concepts: Mutually Assured Destruction, brinkmanship, saber rattling, proportional responses, arms sales, false flag, propaganda, optics, politicians using false pretense, what a civil war is, what a guarantee is, what a source is, and what an expert is. I won't bother explaining though because it'll do no good.

To be fair, if it happened in the trump administration, the posts in this thread would all be the same. They'd just be posted by the other team in each case.

When I read this post I thought to myself there is no way this was actually true even with the craziness of the time, so I went to the source data expecting the graph to be fake, but I'll be damned if that shìt wasn't in the Rasmussen data. So either they did a good job of creating a fake source data set to go with the graph or people actually went shìtbag crazy. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

Maybe the point is that the whole movie industry is down?

From a talent standpoint, I think Pierre Strong is a better back than Moss, and Strong will probably have more value during the season if Ramondre isn't hurt, but in a situation where both Stevenson and Taylor get hurt, I'd rather have Moss since the Pats will almost certainly pull some BS with the rotation. Given I almost always go talent over situation in close calls like these, and it's dynasty so Strong could end up on another team after awhile, I suppose I roll the dice with Strong.

The off the top of my head running backs listed as backups on the depth chart rankings Damien Harris (because I think he's better than James Cook) AJ Dillon Rashaad Penny Elijah Mitchell Tyler Allgeier Jamal Williams Gus Edwards Jaylen Warren Ty Chandler Jamyr Gibbs Tyjae Spears Samaje Perine Jerome Ford

US already won. Russia now knows they can't just do whatever they want. Even the Biden family is going to win. Even if Russia eventually gobbles up all of Ukraine, I'm sure the Biden's already got a lifetime of kickbacks for all the money they're sending over.