nobody

Maybe what? 1% of fans know Payton went to Jackson St? Maybe what? 30% even saw him play? I don't think having 1 great player 50 years ago disqualifies the school from being considered second tier players.

I remember having this same discussion 15 years ago. It's standard to score it that way. Once the defensive player possesses the ball, the defense becomes the offense and the offensive players that turned it over become the defense.

That won't work For normies, they'll know they still have healthcare and it wasn't taken away, and they know Trump is out of office in two years. Wokies will eat it up though.

This dummy probably doesn't even realize he's a red team NPC. Dummy also doesn't realize that he's being controlled by the media he consumes. Let's watch while the NPC monkey denies it.

There's a never ending line of them.

Your mistake is you think people have memories. DNC had control of media and therefore controlled the mob. The red team saw this and took control of the media and now they have control of the mob. All the blue team has to do is get control of the story again some how. They'll figure out a way, and once they do all these stories that are potentially keep the red leaning mob engaged will go away.

That may be a rank insult, but it was funny.

Oh well, if they took the name down because people rightly objected and the building doesn't exist anymore, I guess that means the people that originally supported it all changed their minds and don't see this woman as an icon. This chick.

Definitely start nabers. No question.

Nice. thank god we finally have proof the guy shooting up ICE didn't like ICE. No way to tell otherwise.

Not like you wokies won't hate it because OMB

Now everyone has to switch their positions. This would be funny as hell if taco doesn't taco.

Still hoping. I'm sure it will be any day now

Do we need to speculate that hard on the motive if a guy shoots up an ICE vehicle? Most of the time it isn't a Tom Clancy novel.

In poker the concept is big bets carry the most weight. The idea is like if some guy was slow playing and all of the sudden hammers the river, discount the slow play. He's saying he either made a huge hand on the river or flopped a huge hand and was trying to string you along. At least that's what he's saying. The weird part about these shootings is we always completely ignore the biggest bet which of course is the dude shooting people. That is the biggest and most telling action and for some reason we always discount that and listen to friends and search histories and Halloween costumes from 10 years ago and what they registered as 5 years ago. How do you guys function in life when you guys continually make easy shìt hard?

That's some serious trolling this guy was doing. He's not anti-ice guys. He's just a troll.

What the... Who dis?

I think it very much matters that it's a comedy show. It's entertainment not news. Jason Garrett's horrible football analysis isn't factual and causes public harm to the people that listen to him by making them dumber and the people that listen to his analysis for betting purposes are harmed financially.

He's saying it's stupid because he hasn't been given the counter talking points yet. It's not dumb at all. It's probably just a misapplication of the law. I would also argue this is an overreach of the application that would set a bad precedent. Or maybe a good one. I guess we could try arguing that even if it is a misapplication of the law, maybe it's necessary to force people to get things correct, but then we'd run into the problem of who gets to decide it's correct. Nah, it's bad precedent. Too bad Egregious George bounced. He was great at this stuff

You guys are finally getting to the best argument. Not winnable, but better than claiming abc fired him for cause. But while it's better, I would need more... 1. It's not a news program. It's a comedy show. 2. What public harm?

Young healthy people don't need jabs too. Couldn't say that. Saying the jab won't prevent you from getting covid. Best part about that one was there was a minute when they finally had to admit it, a bunch of covidians were all like, "well of course a vaccine doesn't keep you from getting the disease, duh!!!" Anyone who brought up myocarditis... Don't say lockdowns weren't necessary. And not covid, but not sure how hunter's laptop implicating Biden in a pay for access scheme had anything to do with public health.

Agreed. I've never wavered on censorship whether it's your team doing it or trump, and I was one of the first to say this Kimmel thing was over the line in this thread. The problem is all you hypocrites that were cool with the Dems censorship are coming in and giving the MAGAs something to cling to. As usual you guys keep having opinions when you guys need to sit down and stfu.

The only difference is the pretending part. That doesn't make him worse.

I'll assume the things that are inaccurate in this post are you firing for effect as.i trust that you know they did more than censor what you call lies, and say yes. By the way, I don't know if you guys don't see it, or just don't won't to admit it, but the politicians you support are all dishonest, power hungry, greedy, egomaniac sociopaths just like Trump. What Trump adds to the equation is the inability to hide it behind a filter. They're all the same. You probably need to have those traits to win elections and stay in office.

Nope. Political pressure. Your side is as bad as Trump.