nobody

Broncos not kicking FG?

I guess we know why no one was talking about Cam Ward this off-season. Welcome to the NFL, rook.

Surprised Keaton Mitchell is a healthy scratch. He's better than Justice Hill.

My guy Landman with the game sealing peanut punch forced fumble. How could anyone know he'd be an IDP starter? Trick question. No one could've possibly known.

Houston already used 4 runningbacks.

This doesn't deserve it's own thread, but the Texans are hitting hard on defense today. Just brutal hits.

Now that London is hurt, I guess you shouldn't do the trade

He ain't wrong. Your post seem to indicate that if it wasn't for whitey, africa would be a peaceful utopia. Africa is full of war and corruption that ain't got nothing to do with whitey. Pacifism without strength is just weakness. and Africa bears that out. They've been killing themselves for centuries just like every other society.

I'm not sure what you're saying, but I'm fine with immigration if people want to be American. The problem is they want to bring the 3rd world policies with them. Minnesota trying to be little Somalia.

I'm surprised Mr. Never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever take a QB before round 10 is overvaluing Daniels so much. It's the beginning of the season, so draft position is still relevant. It's a 2nd and maybe 7th for a 4th and a 5th. You take the 2nd rounder in that spot every time.

You're missing the point as usual. No you couldn't move to Central Park. You couldn't defend it. The point he is making is that complaining about colonizing is stupid. Throughout history, the weak are defeated by the strong. The difference now is people don't realize that and we're allowing our would be invaders to simply move in because we want to be "nice.". We're essentially allowing people to complain their way into power. It's truly bizarre. The funny thing is if africa had the means to conquer europe they would have. Europeans really need to start owning it when people cry about colonization. The answer should be, "yep. They should've fought better."

I would do the trade for what it's worth

It's a fair trade. Nix is serviceable, but London is a huge upgrade over Metcalf.

Yes. He's been grifting for years.

That was going before he got dementia and executed by his crackhead son

I'm listening to a podcast called "this is football" by Kevin Clark. I like clark because he makes sharp points. I rarely hear him say things like, "it just is" which is the hallmark signal to me that someone is either unprepared or doesn't know what they are talking about. Anyway, he's got Allen Robinson on and they're talking about what he learned from Sean mcvay who I grant is probably an actual genius, but listening to Robinson, one of the things mcvay did to revolutionize the game was make defenses defend multiple options. Robinson talks about how he has the receivers line up such that the spacing doesn't allow the defense to eliminate route possibilities and he gave the example of having outside receivers line up more inside so the defense has to defend out routes (obviously if you're very far outside, you don't have room to run an out). That's smart of course, but my question is this? Are football coaches retarded? Why haven't teams always made an effort not to tip their routes? Why haven't they always disguised the play with multiple plays off of same formations? To me, this is obvious stuff. Why wouldn't teams always do it? I literally built playbooks in Madden that were made to disguise plays back when I was in high school.

Chargers ran a version of this. Except they didn't do the push. Instead had the tightened motion in and sneak.

He ain't wrong. You pulled the gutterboy and looked that shìt up and then acted like you already knew it.

No worries guys. He says he feels great. He feels so great they won't let him practice. I guess they're just lying right to our faces now.

I guess worthy didn't like Swift's last album. Kelce laid him out. Looks like he dinged up his right shoulder.

My opinion is my call. But if Trump falls backward into the right result, I'm okay with that in this instance. You guys are acting like the constitution is going straight in the trash because the president wants to sway funding. That's a gray area at best. What you should be railing against is Trump using his position to single out for punitive action institutions, agencies, states, etc. that he perceives did him wrong. Get off the constitution thing. It's not a winner in this instance. Too bad you guys didn't fight as hard against the covid jab mandates you were supposedly against as hard as you're fighting for Harvard not to have to spend their own money on their own research. That's a great gig. Become a well known college. Get alumni in positions of power that can influence where money is allocated. Have money allocated to "research" at your university so you don't ever have to dip into your own funds. If a corporation did that, you guys would be pissed as hell.

Poor harvard. Cant afford to do their super critical research with tax dollars.

I don't give a flying fock about red and blue. Clinton is in those files too. I want people who abused tennage girls in jail. Whoever is in charge needs to do it. Why anyone thought the sh¡tbag wokies would do it is laughable, but the supposed party of morals should be doing it. But of course all the monkeys wearing red just want to win the argument.

The fact that harvard is even fighting so hard for this money should tell you they shouldn't have it. Just another boondoggle. School has a 53 billion dollar endowment and crying poor and can't do research.

DOGE cut the people auditing Harvard's federal grant money spending? Tell me more.